Planning, guidance, and quality assurance of pelvic screw placement using deformable image registration

Percutaneous pelvic screw placement is challenging due to narrow bone corridors surrounded by vulnerable structures and difficult visual interpretation of complex anatomical shapes in 2D x-ray projection images. To address these challenges, a system for planning, guidance, and quality assurance (QA) is presented, providing functionality analogous to surgical navigation, but based on robust 3D-2D image registration techniques using fluoroscopy images already acquired in routine workflow. Two novel aspects of the system are investigated: automatic planning of pelvic screw trajectories and the ability to account for deformation of surgical devices (K-wire deflection). Atlas-based registration is used to calculate a patient-specific plan of screw trajectories in preoperative CT. 3D-2D registration aligns the patient to CT within the projective geometry of intraoperative fluoroscopy. Deformable known-component registration (dKC-Reg) localizes the surgical device, and the combination of plan and device location is used to provide guidance and QA. A leave-one-out analysis evaluated the accuracy of automatic planning, and a cadaver experiment compared the accuracy of dKC-Reg to rigid approaches (e.g. optical tracking). Surgical plans conformed within the bone cortex by 3-4 mm for the narrowest corridor (superior pubic ramus) and  >5 mm for the widest corridor (tear drop). The dKC-Reg algorithm localized the K-wire tip within 1.1 mm and 1.4° and was consistently more accurate than rigid-body tracking (errors up to 9 mm). The system was shown to automatically compute reliable screw trajectories and accurately localize deformed surgical devices (K-wires). Such capability could improve guidance and QA in orthopaedic surgery, where workflow is impeded by manual planning, conventional tool trackers add complexity and cost, rigid tool assumptions are often inaccurate, and qualitative interpretation of complex anatomy from 2D projections is prone to trial-and-error with extended fluoroscopy time.

[1]  S. Schafer,et al.  Automatic localization of vertebral levels in x-ray fluoroscopy using 3D-2D registration: a tool to reduce wrong-site surgery , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  Pol Maria Rommens,et al.  Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis , 2017, Springer International Publishing.

[3]  Gerhard Kleinszig,et al.  Deformable 3D-2D Registration of Known Components for Image Guidance in Spine Surgery , 2016, MICCAI.

[4]  Jürgen Weese,et al.  A comparison of similarity measures for use in 2-D-3-D medical image registration , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[5]  J. Chapman,et al.  Anatomic and Radiographic Considerations for Placement of Transiliac Screws in Lumbopelvic Fixations , 2002, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[6]  Yoshito Otake,et al.  Robust 3D–2D image registration: application to spine interventions and vertebral labeling in the presence of anatomical deformation , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  Andriy Myronenko,et al.  Point Set Registration: Coherent Point Drift , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[8]  Hans-Christian Hege,et al.  Fast Generation of Virtual X-ray Images for Reconstruction of 3D Anatomy , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[9]  Hans-Peter Meinzer,et al.  Statistical shape models for 3D medical image segmentation: A review , 2009, Medical Image Anal..

[10]  Bing-Fang Zeng,et al.  Minimally Invasive Fluoro-Navigation Screw Fixation for the Treatment of Pelvic Ring Injuries , 2011, Surgical innovation.

[11]  Bostjan Likar,et al.  A review of 3D/2D registration methods for image-guided interventions , 2012, Medical Image Anal..

[12]  Hans-Christian Hege,et al.  Automatic Segmentation of the Pelvic Bones from CT Data Based on a Statistical Shape Model , 2008, VCBM.

[13]  T. Peters Image-guidance for surgical procedures , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  Ronald M. Summers,et al.  2D View Aggregation for Lymph Node Detection Using a Shallow Hierarchy of Linear Classifiers , 2014, MICCAI.

[15]  Russell H. Taylor,et al.  Statistical Atlases of Bone Anatomy: Construction, Iterative Improvement and Validation , 2007, MICCAI.

[16]  J. Siewerdsen,et al.  3D–2D registration for surgical guidance: effect of projection view angles on registration accuracy , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  Ivan Marintschev,et al.  2D-fluoroscopic navigated percutaneous screw fixation of pelvic ring injuries - a case series , 2010, BMC musculoskeletal disorders.

[18]  Bostjan Likar,et al.  Computer-Assisted Screw Size and Insertion Trajectory Planning for Pedicle Screw Placement Surgery , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[19]  P. Kregor,et al.  Percutaneous iliosacral screws with the patient supine technique , 1993 .

[20]  W. E. Caldwell,et al.  Anatomical variations in the female pelvis and their effect in labor with a suggested classification , 1933 .

[21]  R W Lindsey,et al.  The use of a virtual three-dimensional model to evaluate the intraosseous space available for percutaneous screw fixation of acetabular fractures. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[22]  J. Gower Generalized procrustes analysis , 1975 .

[23]  J. Warren,et al.  Mean value coordinates for closed triangular meshes , 2005, SIGGRAPH 2005.

[24]  P. Simonian,et al.  Preliminary Report: The Retrograde Medullary Superior Pubic Ramus Screw for the Treatment of Anterior Pelvic Ring Disruptions: A New Technique , 1995, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[25]  Adam J Starr,et al.  Computed Tomography-Based Software Safely Guides Anterograde Percutaneous Anterior and Posterior Column Acetabular Screws. , 2016, Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances.

[26]  Andrew Bucknill,et al.  Fluoroscopically assisted computer navigation enables accurate percutaneous screw placement for pelvic and acetabular fracture fixation. , 2015, Injury.

[27]  C. Roberts,et al.  Percutaneous fixation of the pelvic ring: an update. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[28]  A Uneri,et al.  3D–2D image registration for target localization in spine surgery: investigation of similarity metrics providing robustness to content mismatch , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[29]  F. Wang,et al.  Precision insertion of percutaneous sacroiliac screws using a novel augmented reality-based navigation system: a pilot study , 2016, International Orthopaedics.

[30]  Jean-Marc Chassery,et al.  Approximated Centroidal Voronoi Diagrams for Uniform Polygonal Mesh Coarsening , 2004, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[31]  Hans-Christian Hege,et al.  Omnidirectional displacements for deformable surfaces , 2013, Medical Image Anal..

[32]  Hans-Christian Hege,et al.  A 3D statistical shape model of the pelvic bone for segmentation , 2004, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[33]  A Uneri,et al.  Known-component 3D–2D registration for quality assurance of spine surgery pedicle screw placement , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[34]  Gabor Fichtinger,et al.  Electromagnetic tracking in surgical and interventional environments: usability study , 2015, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[35]  Yoshito Otake,et al.  An electromagnetic “Tracker-in-Table” configuration for X-ray fluoroscopy and cone-beam CT-guided surgery , 2012, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[36]  E. F. Barrick,et al.  Iliosacral screw insertion using computer-assisted CT image guidance: a laboratory study. , 1998, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[37]  David E. Reynolds,et al.  Automatic segmentation , 1986 .

[38]  Chaoyang Chen,et al.  An evaluation of three-dimensional image-guided technologies in percutaneous pelvic and acetabular lag screw placement. , 2013, The Journal of surgical research.

[39]  A Uneri,et al.  Intraoperative evaluation of device placement in spine surgery using known-component 3D–2D image registration , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.

[40]  Juan José Jiménez-Delgado,et al.  Computer assisted preoperative planning of bone fracture reduction: Simulation techniques and new trends , 2016, Medical Image Anal..

[41]  Robert C. Bolles,et al.  Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography , 1981, CACM.

[42]  A. Jones,et al.  Percutaneous fixation of the columns of the acetabulum: a new technique. , 1998, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[43]  Thomas Ortner,et al.  Percutaneous fixation of acetabular fractures: computer-assisted determination of safe zones, angles and lengths for screw insertion , 2012, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[44]  David A Jaffray,et al.  Accurate technique for complete geometric calibration of cone-beam computed tomography systems. , 2005, Medical physics.

[45]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Multi-atlas based segmentation of brain images: Atlas selection and its effect on accuracy , 2009, NeuroImage.

[46]  A Uneri,et al.  Spinal pedicle screw planning using deformable atlas registration , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.

[47]  Michael Hoffmann,et al.  A novel electromagnetic navigation tool for acetabular surgery. , 2015, Injury.

[48]  Petros Koumoutsakos,et al.  Reducing the Time Complexity of the Derandomized Evolution Strategy with Covariance Matrix Adaptation (CMA-ES) , 2003, Evolutionary Computation.

[49]  Giovanni F Solitro,et al.  Innovative approach in the development of computer assisted algorithm for spine pedicle screw placement. , 2016, Medical engineering & physics.

[50]  Hui Zhao,et al.  A novel navigation template for fixation of acetabular posterior column fractures with antegrade lag screws: design and application , 2016, International Orthopaedics.

[51]  Stephen M. Moore,et al.  The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA): Maintaining and Operating a Public Information Repository , 2013, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[52]  Ronald M. Summers,et al.  A New 2.5D Representation for Lymph Node Detection Using Random Sets of Deep Convolutional Neural Network Observations , 2014, MICCAI.

[53]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Active Shape Models-Their Training and Application , 1995, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[54]  Russell H. Taylor,et al.  Assessing accuracy factors in deformable 2D/3D medical image registration using a statistical pelvis model , 2003, Proceedings Ninth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.

[55]  Steven L. Hartmann,et al.  Spinal Navigation and Imaging: History, Trends, and Future , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.