Magnetic forces produced by rectangular permanent magnets in static microsystems.

Finite element numerical simulations were carried out in 2D geometries to map the magnetic field and force distribution produced by rectangular permanent magnets as a function of their size and position with respect to a microchannel. A single magnet, two magnets placed in attraction and in repulsion have been considered. The goal of this work is to show where magnetic beads are preferentially captured in a microchannel. These simulations were qualitatively corroborated, in one geometrical case, by microscopic visualizations of magnetic bead plug formation in a capillary. The results show that the number of plugs is configuration dependent with: in attraction, one plug in the middle of the magnets; in repulsion, two plugs near the edges of the magnets; and with a single magnet, a plug close to the center of the magnet. The geometry of the magnets (h and l are the height and length of the magnets respectively) and their relative spacing s has a significant impact on the magnetic flux density. Its value inside a magnet increases with the h/l ratio. Consequently, bar magnets produce larger and more uniform values than flat magnets. The l/s ratio also influences the magnetic force value in the microchannel, both increasing concomitantly for all the configurations. In addition, a zero force zone in the middle appears in the attraction configuration as the l/s ratio increases, while with a single magnet, the number of maxima and minima goes from one to two, producing two focusing zones instead of only one.

[1]  Loïc Dayon,et al.  Microfluidic systems in proteomics , 2003, Electrophoresis.

[2]  D. Peterson,et al.  Solid supports for micro analytical systems. , 2005, Lab on a chip.

[3]  Victor Samper,et al.  On-chip micro-electromagnets for magnetic-based bio-molecules separation , 2004 .

[4]  Donald E Ingber,et al.  Combined microfluidic-micromagnetic separation of living cells in continuous flow , 2006, Biomedical microdevices.

[5]  H. Girault,et al.  Capillary electrophoresis immunoassay using magnetic beads , 2008, Electrophoresis.

[6]  P. Bhattacharya EDITORIAL: New developments for Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics New developments for Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics , 2008 .

[7]  J. Viovy,et al.  Epitope mapping of allergen ovalbumin using biofunctionalized magnetic beads packed in microfluidic channels The first step towards epitope-based vaccines. , 2008, Journal of chromatography. A.

[8]  T. S. West Analytical Chemistry , 1969, Nature.

[9]  Maria Careri,et al.  Selective and rapid immunomagnetic bead-based sample treatment for the liquid chromatography-electrospray ion-trap mass spectrometry detection of Ara h3/4 peanut protein in foods. , 2008, Journal of chromatography. A.

[10]  P. Massé,et al.  Numerical modeling of superparamagnetic sub-micronic particles trajectories under the coupled action of 3D force fields , 2000 .

[11]  K. Dorfman,et al.  Motion of single long DNA molecules through arrays of magnetic columns , 2005, Electrophoresis.

[12]  Mark A. Hayes,et al.  Active Control of Dynamic Supraparticle Structures in Microchannels , 2001 .

[13]  大房 健 基礎講座 電気泳動(Electrophoresis) , 2005 .

[14]  Kevin D Dorfman,et al.  Quantitative microfluidic separation of DNA in self-assembled magnetic matrixes. , 2004, Analytical chemistry.

[15]  Gareth P. Hatch,et al.  Magnetic design considerations for devices and particles used for biological high-gradient magnetic separation (HGMS) systems , 2001 .

[16]  Henrik Bruus,et al.  Microfluidic capturing-dynamics of paramagnetic bead suspensions. , 2005, Lab on a chip.

[17]  Ajay Kumar Gupta,et al.  Synthesis and surface engineering of iron oxide nanoparticles for biomedical applications. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[18]  George M Whitesides,et al.  The force acting on a superparamagnetic bead due to an applied magnetic field. , 2007, Lab on a chip.

[19]  Elisabeth Verpoorte,et al.  Beads and chips: new recipes for analysis. , 2003, Lab on a chip.

[20]  O. Hansen,et al.  Magnetic separation in microfluidic systems using microfabricated electromagnets—experiments and simulations , 2005 .

[21]  Martin A M Gijs,et al.  Full on-chip nanoliter immunoassay by geometrical magnetic trapping of nanoparticle chains. , 2008, Analytical chemistry.

[22]  Jean-Louis Viovy,et al.  Use of self assembled magnetic beads for on-chip protein digestion. , 2005, Lab on a chip.

[23]  T. Imasaka,et al.  On‐column capture of a specific protein in capillary electrophoresis using magnetic beads , 2006, Electrophoresis.

[24]  Edward P. Furlani,et al.  Analytical model for the magnetic field and force in a magnetophoretic microsystem , 2006 .

[25]  Mikkel Fougt Hansen,et al.  Towards a programmable magnetic bead microarray in a microfluidic channel , 2007 .

[26]  Nicole Pamme,et al.  Simultaneous bioassays in a microfluidic channel on plugs of different magnetic particles. , 2008, Analytica chimica acta.

[27]  A. Wolff,et al.  Theoretical analysis of a new, efficient microfluidic magnetic bead separator based on magnetic structures on multiple length scales , 2008 .

[28]  Nicole Pamme,et al.  Magnetism and microfluidics. , 2006, Lab on a chip.

[29]  Martin A. M. Gijs,et al.  Magnetic bead handling on-chip: new opportunities for analytical applications , 2004 .

[30]  Hana Macková,et al.  Preparation and properties of magnetic nano- and microsized particles for biological and environmental separations. , 2007, Journal of separation science.

[31]  Maciej Zborowski,et al.  Continuous cell separation using novel magnetic quadrupole flow sorter , 1999 .

[32]  B. Karger,et al.  Automated microanalysis using magnetic beads with commercial capillary electrophoretic instrumentation. , 1997, Journal of chromatography. A.

[33]  M. Hayes,et al.  Flow-based microimmunoassay. , 2001, Analytical chemistry.

[34]  T. Imasaka,et al.  On‐column capture of a specific protein separated by SDS‐CGE using an immunological reaction on magnetic beads , 2007, Electrophoresis.