A hybrid model for opinion formation

This paper presents a hybrid model for opinion formation in a large group of agents exposed to the persuasive action of a small number of strong opinion leaders. The model is defined by coupling a finite difference equation for the dynamics of leaders opinion with a continuous integro-differential equation for the dynamics of the others. Such a definition stems from the idea that the leaders are few and tend to retain original opinions, so that their dynamics occur on a longer time scale with respect to the one of the other agents. A general well-posedness result is established for the initial value problem linked to the model. The asymptotic behavior in time of the related solution is characterized for some general parameter settings, which mimic distinct social scenarios, where different emerging behaviors can be observed. Analytical results are illustrated and extended through numerical simulations.

[1]  P. Markowich,et al.  Boltzmann and Fokker–Planck equations modelling opinion formation in the presence of strong leaders , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[2]  F. Salvarani,et al.  Modelling opinion formation by means of kinetic equations , 2010 .

[3]  Lorenzo Pareschi,et al.  Mathematical Modeling of Collective Behavior in Socio-Economic and Life Sciences , 2010 .

[4]  Ruggero Carli,et al.  Communication constraints in the average consensus problem , 2008, Autom..

[5]  Giuseppe Toscani,et al.  A Boltzmann-like equation for choice formation , 2009 .

[6]  E. Ben-Naim,et al.  Bifurcations and patterns in compromise processes , 2002, cond-mat/0212313.

[7]  G. Toscani,et al.  Kinetic models of opinion formation , 2006 .

[8]  Herbert Gintis,et al.  Game Theory Evolving: A Problem-Centered Introduction to Modeling Strategic Interaction - Second Edition , 2009 .

[9]  Felipe Cucker,et al.  Emergent Behavior in Flocks , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[10]  Jan Lorenz,et al.  Continuous Opinion Dynamics under Bounded Confidence: A Survey , 2007, 0707.1762.

[11]  Jie Lin,et al.  Coordination of groups of mobile autonomous agents using nearest neighbor rules , 2003, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[12]  Maria Letizia Bertotti,et al.  Cluster formation in opinion dynamics: a qualitative analysis , 2010 .

[13]  Reza Olfati-Saber,et al.  Consensus and Cooperation in Networked Multi-Agent Systems , 2007, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[14]  F. Guerra.  Spin Glasses , 2005, cond-mat/0507581.

[15]  C. Villani.  Chapter 2 – A Review of Mathematical Topics in Collisional Kinetic Theory , 2002 .

[16]  S. Redner,et al.  Unity and discord in opinion dynamics , 2003 .

[17]  Andrea Manica,et al.  Evolution of personality differences in leadership , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  T. Başar,et al.  Dynamic Noncooperative Game Theory , 1982 .

[19]  M. Degroot.  Reaching a Consensus , 1974 .

[20]  Vicsek,et al.  Novel type of phase transition in a system of self-driven particles. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[21]  S. Fortunato,et al.  Statistical physics of social dynamics , 2007, 0710.3256.

[22]  Jan Lorenz,et al.  A stabilization theorem for dynamics of continuous opinions , 2005, 0708.2981.

[23]  Luc Moreau,et al.  Stability of multiagent systems with time-dependent communication links , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[24]  Giacomo Como,et al.  Scaling limits for continuous opinion dynamics systems , 2009, 2009 47th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton).

[25]  U. Krause.  A DISCRETE NONLINEAR AND NON–AUTONOMOUS MODEL OF CONSENSUS FORMATION , 2007 .

[26]  E. Ben-Naim.  Opinion dynamics: Rise and fall of political parties , 2004, cond-mat/0411427.

[27]  D. West.  Introduction to Graph Theory , 1995 .

[28]  Antoine Girard,et al.  Opinion Dynamics With Decaying Confidence: Application to Community Detection in Graphs , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[29]  Sean McNamara,et al.  Kinetics of a one‐dimensional granular medium in the quasielastic limit , 1993 .

[30]  C. Canuto,et al.  A Eulerian approach to the analysis of rendez-vous algorithms , 2008 .

[31]  Adriano Barra,et al.  Parameter Evaluation of a Simple Mean-Field Model of Social Interaction , 2008, 0810.3029.