A Comparative Analysis of Public and Private Sector Entrant Quality

Theory: Public and private sector employees differ in ways that run counter to the prediction that poor monetary incentives or image battering will leave the public sector disadvantaged in hiring quality employees. Hypothesis: When controlling for sex, race, economic status, and occupation, entrants into the federal sector are better qualified than private sector entrants. Method: Past research on the issue of employee quality is supplemented with a comparative analysis of public and private sector entrants during the 1980s. In the comparative analysis, AFQT scores are used as an indicator of quality. Results: Contrary to predictions of a crisis in public employee competence, the federal government was able to attract higher quality entrants during the 1980s than the private sector.

[1]  Paul A. Volcker.  Leadership for America: Rebuilding the Public Service , 1990 .

[2]  R. L. Phillips,et al.  Are Smart Tankers Better? AFQT and Military A Productivity , 1986 .

[3]  David Packard.  The Loss of Governmental Scientific and Engineering Talent. , 1986 .

[4]  David K. Horne,et al.  The Impact of Soldier Quality On Army Performance , 1987 .

[5]  Amitai Etzioni,et al.  The Moral Dimension: Toward a New Economics , 1989, Journal of Marketing.

[6]  H. Rainey,et al.  Reward Preferences among Public and Private Managers: In Search of the Service Ethic , 1982 .

[7]  Richard M. Steers,et al.  Motivation and Work Behaviour , 1978 .

[8]  J. F. Guyot.  Government Bureaucrats Are Different , 1962 .

[9]  Gregory B. Lewis.  Progress toward Racial and Sexual Equality in the Federal Civil Service , 1988 .

[10]  Robert Vineberg,et al.  Performance in Four Army Jobs by Men at Different Aptitude (AFQT) Levels: 4. Relationships between Performance Criteria. , 1972 .

[11]  B. Steel,et al.  Job Satisfaction Among Early Labor Force Participants: Unexpected Outcomes in Public and Private Sector Comparisons , 1990 .

[12]  R. Herrnstein,et al.  The Bell Curve , 1994 .

[13]  J. Nalbandian,et al.  Individual Values and Professional Education , 1981 .

[14]  James F. Wolf,et al.  The human resource crisis in the public sector : rebuilding the capacity to govern , 1991 .

[15]  Kenneth J. Meier,et al.  Politics and the bureaucracy: Policymaking in the fourth branch of government , 1979 .

[16]  David H. Rosenbloom,et al.  Political Foundations of the American Federal Service: Rebuilding a Crumbling Base , 1990 .

[17]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior , 1975, Perspectives in Social Psychology.

[18]  Judith C. Fernandez.  Soldier quality and job performance in team tasks. , 1992 .

[19]  J. Hartigan,et al.  Fairness in employment testing. , 1989, Science.

[20]  A. Maslow.  Motivation and Personality , 1954 .

[21]  James L. Perry,et al.  The Motivational Bases of Public Service , 1990 .

[22]  F. Kilpatrick,et al.  The image of the federal service , 1964 .

[23]  Charles H. Levine.  The Federal Government in the Year 2000: Administrative Legacies of the Reagan Years , 1986 .

[24]  R. M. Monczka,et al.  Motivating the Public Employee: Fact vs. Fiction , 1976 .

[25]  B. Rosen.  Crises in the U.S. Civil Service , 1986 .