Determinants of New Product Development Team Performance: A Meta‐analytic Review

New product development (NPD) has become a critical determinant of firm performance. There is a considerable body of research examining the factors that influence a firm's ability to successfully develop and introduce new products. Vital to this success is the creation and management of NPD teams. While the evidence for the use of NPD teams and the factors that determine their success is accumulating, there is still a lack of clarity on the team-level variables that are most impactful on NPD success. This meta-analytic study examines the effects of NPD team characteristics on three different measures of success: effectiveness (market success), efficiency (meeting budgets and schedules), and speed-to-market, requiring incorporation of a broader set of team variables than previous studies in order to capture more factors explaining NPD outcomes. Unlike a typical empirical study that considered no more than two team variables to predict NPD performance, this study combines research spanning eight team variables including team input variables (team tenure, functional diversity, team ability, and team leadership) and team process variables (internal and external team communication, group cohesiveness, and goal clarity). Results from 38 studies were aggregated to estimate the meta-analytic effect sizes for each of the variables. Using the meta-analytic results, a path analytic model of NPD success was estimated to isolate the unique effects of team characteristics on NPD effectiveness and efficiency. Results indicate that team leadership, team ability, external communication, goal clarity, and group cohesiveness are the critical determinants of NPD team performance. NPD teams with considerable experience and led by a transformational leader are more successful at developing new products. Effective boundary spanning within and outside the organization and a shared understanding of project objectives are paramount to success. Group cohesiveness is also an important predictor of NPD outcomes confirming the importance of esprit de corps within the team. The findings provide product development managers with a blueprint for creating high-performance NPD teams.

[1]  C. Anthony Di Benedetto,et al.  Antecedents and consequences of teamwork quality in new product development projects , 2009 .

[2]  Anthony Di Benedetto,et al.  Managerial Trust in New Product Development Projects: Its Antecedents and Consequences , 2009 .

[3]  Ksenia Podoynitsyna,et al.  Success Factors in New Ventures: A Meta-analysis , 2007 .

[4]  Jay B. Carson,et al.  A Multilevel Investigation of Antecedents and Consequences of Team Member Boundary-Spanning Behavior , 2007 .

[5]  Brent A. Scott,et al.  Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: a meta-analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[6]  Simon S. K. Lam,et al.  Embracing transformational leadership: team values and the impact of leader behavior on team performance. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[7]  Diether Gebert,et al.  Cross-functionality and innovation in new product development teams: A dilemmatic structure and its consequences for the management of diversity , 2006 .

[8]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  Enhancing the Effectiveness of Work Groups and Teams , 2006, Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society.

[9]  Jennifer L. Gibbs,et al.  Unpacking the Concept of Virtuality: The Effects of , 2022 .

[10]  Kevin C. Stagl,et al.  What type of leadership behaviors are functional in teams? A meta-analysis , 2006 .

[11]  Jane M. Howell,et al.  Effects of Champion Behavior, Team Potency, and External Communication Activities on Predicting Team Performance , 2006 .

[12]  M. Hoegl,et al.  Team Reflexivity in Innovative Projects , 2006 .

[13]  P. Carbonell,et al.  Cómo acelerar el proceso de desarrollo de los nuevos productos en diferentes contextos de complejidad tecnológica Designing teams for speedy product development: The moderating effect of technological complexity , 2006 .

[14]  G. Stewart.  A Meta-Analytic Review of Relationships Between Team Design Features and Team Performance , 2006 .

[15]  John Byrne,et al.  Knowledge Networks in New Product Development Projects: A Transactive Memory Perspective , 2005, Inf. Manag..

[16]  G. V. D. Vegt,et al.  Learning and performance in multidisciplinary teams: The importance of collective team identification , 2005 .

[17]  A. Joshi,et al.  Customer Knowledge Development: Antecedents and Impact on New Product Performance , 2004 .

[18]  K. Fletcher,et al.  Communication Strategies and Marketing Performance: An Application of the Mohr and Nevin Framework to Intra-Organisational Cross-Functional Teams , 2004 .

[19]  Giles Hirst,et al.  A Model of R&D Leadership and Team Communication: The Relationship with Project Performance , 2004 .

[20]  D. Beal,et al.  Cohesion and performance in groups: a meta-analytic clarification of construct relations. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[21]  Shikhar Sarin,et al.  The Effect of Team Leader Characteristics on Learning, Knowledge Application, and Performance of Cross-Functional New Product Development Teams , 2003, Decis. Sci..

[22]  C. D. De Dreu,et al.  Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: a meta-analysis. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[23]  Soumen Ghosh,et al.  The Effects of Knowledge Management on Team Members' Ratings of Project Success and Impact , 2003, Decis. Sci..

[24]  Jan Kratzer,et al.  Virtuality, communication, and new product team creativity: a social network perspective , 2003 .

[25]  K. Atuahene–Gima,et al.  The Effects of Centrifugal and Centripetal Forces on Product Development Speed and Quality: How Does Problem Solving Matter? , 2003 .

[26]  Ali E. Akgün,et al.  Launch Your New Products/Services Better, Faster , 2003 .

[27]  Erwin Danneels.  The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences , 2002 .

[28]  Debasish N. Mallick,et al.  An Integrated Framework for Measuring Product Development Performance in High Technology Industries , 2003 .

[29]  Charmine E. J. Härtel,et al.  How leaders influence the impact of affective events on team climate and performance in R&D teams , 2002 .

[30]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. A 35-year odyssey. , 2002, The American psychologist.

[31]  G. Lynn,et al.  Antecedents and Consequences of Team Stability on New Product Development Performance , 2002 .

[32]  Ali E. Akgün,et al.  New product development team improvisation and speed‐to‐market: an extended model , 2002 .

[33]  Donald Gerwin,et al.  An Evaluation of Research on Integrated Product Development , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[34]  Richard R. Reilly,et al.  Multi‐dimensionality of learning in new product development teams , 2002 .

[35]  Dennis J. Devine,et al.  Do Smarter Teams Do Better , 2001 .

[36]  David M. Szymanski,et al.  Why Some New Products are More Successful than Others , 2001 .

[37]  Debra L. Shapiro,et al.  Maximizing cross-functional new product teams' innovativeness and constraint adherence: A conflict communications perspective. , 2001 .

[38]  M. Hoegl,et al.  Teamwork Quality and the Success of Innovative Projects , 2001 .

[39]  John E. Mathieu,et al.  A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes , 2001 .

[40]  R. Keller,et al.  Cross-Functional Project Groups in Research and New Product Development: Diversity, Communications, Job Stress, and Outcomes , 2001 .

[41]  Rajesh Sethi,et al.  Structural and contextual correlates of charged behavior in product development teams , 2001 .

[42]  S. Webber,et al.  Impact of highly and less job-related diversity on work group cohesion and performance: a meta-analysis , 2001 .

[43]  Daniel C. Smith,et al.  Cross-Functional Product Development Teams, Creativity, and the Innovativeness of New Consumer Products , 2001 .

[44]  L. Sproull,et al.  Coordinating Expertise in Software Development Teams , 2000 .

[45]  Rajesh Sethi,et al.  Superordinate identity in cross-functional product development teams: Its antecedents and effect on new product performance , 2000 .

[46]  James A. Pharmer,et al.  When Member Homogeneity is Needed in Work Teams , 2000 .

[47]  Rajesh Sethi.  New Product Quality and Product Development Teams , 2000 .

[48]  E. Kessler.  Tightening the belt: methods for reducing development costs associated with new product innovation , 2000 .

[49]  Avan R. Jassawalla,et al.  Strategies of Effective New Product Team Leaders , 2000 .

[50]  Kate D. Abel,et al.  Practices that Support Team Learning and Their Impact on Speed to Market and New Product Success , 1999 .

[51]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  The Effect of Team Building on Performance , 1999 .

[52]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Exploring the Black Box: An Analysis of Work Group Diversity, Conflict and Performance , 1999 .

[53]  T. Duncan,et al.  A Communication-Based Marketing Model for Managing Relationships , 1998 .

[54]  S. Scott.  Social identification effects in product and process development teams , 1997 .

[55]  A. Chakrabarti,et al.  Innovation Speed: A Conceptual Model of Context, Antecedents, and Outcomes , 1996 .

[56]  Kevin B. Lowe,et al.  Effectiveness correlates of transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic review of the mlq literature , 1996 .

[57]  D. Ones,et al.  Theory testing: Combining psychometric meta-analysis and structural equations modeling , 1995 .

[58]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: PAST RESEARCH, PRESENT FINDINGS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS , 1995 .

[59]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Accelerating Adaptive Processes: Product Innovation in the Global Computer Industry , 1995 .

[60]  R. Calantone,et al.  Determinants of New Product Performance: A Review and Meta-Analysis , 1994 .

[61]  Dwight D. Frink,et al.  A Review of the Influence of Group Goals on Group Performance , 1994 .

[62]  S. Mohammed,et al.  Team Mental Model: Construct or Metaphor? , 1994 .

[63]  J. Pinto,et al.  Antecedents and consequences of project team cross-functional cooperation , 1993 .

[64]  Deborah G. . Ancona,et al.  Bridging the Boundary: External Activity and Performance in Organizational Teams. , 1992 .

[65]  R. Keller,et al.  Transformational Leadership and the Performance of Research and Development Project Groups , 1992, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[66]  Deborah G. . Ancona,et al.  Demography and Design: Predictors of New Product Team Performance , 1992 .

[67]  Edward F. McDonough,et al.  Speeding Up New Product Development: The Effects of Leadership Style and Source of Technology , 1991 .

[68]  Ellen M. Whitener,et al.  Confusion of confidence intervals and credibility intervals in meta-analysis. , 1990 .

[69]  H. Thamhain.  Managing technologically innovative team efforts toward new product success , 1990 .

[70]  C. Gersick.  Time and Transition in Work Teams: Toward a New Model of Group Development , 1988 .

[71]  R. Keller,et al.  Predictors of the Performance of Project Groups in R & D Organizations , 1986 .

[72]  D. L. Gladstein.  Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. , 1984 .

[73]  J. Teachman.  Analysis of Population Diversity , 1980 .

[74]  R. Rosenthal.  The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results , 1979 .

[75]  John M. Jermier,et al.  Substitutes for leadership: Their meaning and measurement , 1978 .

[76]  A. Bedeian,et al.  A History of the Span of Management , 1977 .

[77]  S. Schachter,et al.  An Experimental Study of Cohesiveness and Productivity , 1951 .

[78]  Kenneth B. Kahn,et al.  PERSPECTIVE: Trends and Drivers of Success in NPD Practices: Results of the 2003 PDMA Best Practices Study* , 2009 .

[79]  R. Keller,et al.  Transformational leadership, initiating structure, and substitutes for leadership: a longitudinal study of research and development project team performance. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[80]  Dustin K. Jundt,et al.  Teams in organizations: from input-process-output models to IMOI models. , 2005, Annual review of psychology.

[81]  Kara A. Incalcaterra,et al.  A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[82]  Marco Iansiti,et al.  Special Issue on Design and Development: Developing Products on "Internet Time": The Anatomy of a Flexible Development Process , 2001, Manag. Sci..