HELMET WEARING INCREASES RISK TAKING AND SENSATION SEEKING

Humans adapt their risk-taking behaviour based on perceptions of safety; this risk compensation phenomenon is typified by people taking more risks when using protective equipment. Existing studies have looked at people who know they are using safety equipment, and have specifically examined changes in behaviours against which that equipment might reduce risk. We demonstrate risk-taking increases in people who are not explicitly aware they are wearing protective equipment; furthermore, this happens for behaviours which could not be made safer by that equipment. In a controlled study where a helmet, rather than a hat, was used as the mount for a head-mounted eye-tracker, participants scored significantly higher on laboratory measures of both risk-taking and of sensation-seeking. This happened despite there being no risk for the helmet to ameliorate and despite it being introduced purely as an eye-tracker. The results suggest unconscious activation of safety-related concepts primes globally increased risk propensity.

[1]  R. Petty,et al.  lhe Effects of Overt Head Movements on Persuasion: Compatibility and incompatibility of Responses , 1980 .

[2]  Barbara A Morrongiello,et al.  Understanding children's injury-risk behavior: wearing safety gear can lead to increased risk taking. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[3]  S Fosser,et al.  An investigation of behavioural adaptation to airbags and antilock brakes among taxi drivers. , 1997, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[4]  Gregory L. Stuart,et al.  Evaluation of a behavioral measure of risk taking: the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART). , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[5]  Aslak Fyhri,et al.  Emotional reactions to cycle helmet use. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[6]  J Hedlund,et al.  Risky business: safety regulations, risk compensation, and individual behavior , 2000, Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention.

[7]  Talib Rothengatter,et al.  Task difficulty, risk, effort and comfort in a simulated driving task--Implications for Risk Allostasis Theory. , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[8]  John G.U. Adams,et al.  The efficacy of seat belt legislation , 1982 .

[9]  Fridulv Sagberg,et al.  Risk Compensation and Bicycle Helmets , 2011, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[10]  René M Rossi,et al.  The effect of a helmet on cognitive performance is, at worst, marginal: a controlled laboratory study. , 2014, Applied ergonomics.

[11]  J. Bargh.  What have we been priming all these years? On the development, mechanisms, and ecology of nonconscious social behavior. , 2006, European journal of social psychology.

[12]  Gráinne M. Fitzsimons,et al.  Dogs on the Street, Pumas on Your Feet: How Cues in the Environment Influence Product Evaluation and Choice , 2008 .

[13]  H J Eysenck,et al.  Sensation seeking in England and America: cross-cultural, age, and sex comparisons. , 1978, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[14]  C. Spielberger.  Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) (Form Y , 1983 .

[15]  F. McKenna.  WHAT ROLE SHOULD THE CONCEPT OF RISK PLAY IN THEORIES OF ACCIDENT INVOLVEMENT , 1988 .

[16]  M Hillman,et al.  The risk compensation theory and bicycle helmets , 2001, Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention.

[17]  W Janssen,et al.  Seat-belt wearing and driving behavior: an instrumented-vehicle study. , 1994, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[18]  G J Wilde,et al.  Risk homeostasis theory: an overview , 1998, Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention.

[19]  Paul Thagard,et al.  The affective meanings of automatic social behaviors: three mechanisms that explain priming. , 2013, Psychological review.