Electronic Commerce Research Profiles: Comparing E-Commerce and Information Systems Journals

The rapid diffusion of information and mobile technologies has revolutionized the way we do business and how we conduct our daily lives. Electronic commerce (e-commerce or EC) has had an enormous impact on business practices and has become a new area of study for researchers in related fields. Thousands of papers on this subject have been published in the past two decades, most of which have been published in e-commerce (EC) journals. However, many such papers have been published in information systems (IS) journals. Information systems have become the core discipline that drives e-commerce research. The purpose of this research is to report on the profiles of e-commerce papers published in major EC and IS journals, and to determine whether papers that have appeared in EC journals differ from those published in IS journals. We surveyed EC papers published in ten major journals and conducted a bibliometric analysis. Our findings indicate that (1) more EC papers are published in EC journals, but papers published in IS journals are cited more often; (2) collectively, authors in the U.S. are the most prolific, followed by those in China and Taiwan; (3) more theories were used in recent papers than in earlier ones, and the TAM has been the most popular model; (4) B2C and consumer behavior have been the most popular subject areas for EC research; and (5) the core knowledge measured by the co-citation network was provided by the same group of authors in EC and IS journal publications

[1]  U. Brandes A faster algorithm for betweenness centrality , 2001 .

[2]  Matthew K. O. Lee,et al.  A Trust Model for Consumer Internet Shopping , 2001, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[3]  David L Howard,et al.  Citation Classics in Obstetrics and Gynecology: The 100 Most Frequently Cited Journal Articles in the Last 50 Years , 2011 .

[4]  Hans-Dieter Zimmermann,et al.  Social commerce research: An integrated view , 2013, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[5]  Jonathan W. Palmer,et al.  Web Site Usability, Design, and Performance Metrics , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[6]  Xiaojun Yuan,et al.  Visualizing and mapping the intellectual structure of information retrieval , 2012, Inf. Process. Manag..

[7]  Chaomei Chen,et al.  CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[8]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Measuring e-Commerce Success: Applying the DeLone & McLean Information Systems Success Model , 2004, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[9]  Hsu-Hao Tsai The research trends forecasted by bibliometric methodology: a case study in e-commerce from 1996 to July 2015 , 2015, Scientometrics.

[10]  Andrew Whinston,et al.  Electronic Commerce: A Manager's Guide , 1997 .

[11]  R. Glynn,et al.  The 100 classic papers of orthopaedic surgery: a bibliometric analysis. , 2010, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[12]  Guoqing Zhao,et al.  The Analysis of Research Hotspots and Fronts of Knowledge Visualization Based on CiteSpace II , 2012, ICHL.

[13]  Chien-Lung Hsu,et al.  A bibliometric study of SSME in information systems research , 2014, Scientometrics.

[14]  Chaomei Chen,et al.  Searching for intellectual turning points: Progressive knowledge domain visualization , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  Ting-Peng Liang,et al.  An empirical study on consumer acceptance of products in electronic markets: a transaction cost model , 1998, Decis. Support Syst..

[16]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Evidence of the Effect of Trust Building Technology in Electronic Markets: Price Premiums and Buyer Behavior , 2002, MIS Q..

[17]  Barbara Kitchenham,et al.  Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews , 2004 .

[18]  E. W. T. Ngai,et al.  A literature review and classification of electronic commerce research , 2002, Inf. Manag..

[19]  Anthony F. J. van Raan,et al.  Bibliometric cartography of scientific and technological developments of an R & D field , 1994, Scientometrics.

[20]  Arthur J. Lin,et al.  RETRACTED ARTICLE: Bibliometric study of Electronic Commerce Research in Information Systems & MIS Journals , 2016, Scientometrics.

[21]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Consumer Acceptance of Electronic Commerce: Integrating Trust and Risk with the Technology Acceptance Model , 2003, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[22]  J. Bakos Reducing buyer search costs: implications for electronic marketplaces , 1997 .

[23]  H. Raghav Rao,et al.  A trust-based consumer decision-making model in electronic commerce: The role of trust, perceived risk, and their antecedents , 2008, Decis. Support Syst..

[24]  Muaz A. Niazi,et al.  Agent-based computing from multi-agent systems to agent-based models: a visual survey , 2011, Scientometrics.

[25]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  An empirical analysis of the antecedents of electronic commerce service continuance , 2001, Decis. Support Syst..

[26]  J. Christopher Westland,et al.  Editorial: Electronic Commerce Research in seven maps , 2015, Electronic Commerce Research.

[27]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Journal impact measures in bibliometric research , 2004, Scientometrics.

[28]  S. Cruz,et al.  The Evolution of the Cluster Literature: Shedding Light on the Regional Studies–Regional Science Debate , 2010 .

[29]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Electronic Data Interchange and Small Organizations: Adoption and Impact of Technology , 1995, MIS Q..