Networks and new mutualism: how embeddedness influences commitment and trust in small mutuals

Mutualism is reviving again in several countries, replying to state and market failure with an alternative, social insurance setup. We study participation in such new mutuals with a focus on embeddedness. We distinguish group-level embeddedness (network structure) and individual embeddedness (the type and quantity of ties to other group members) and study how these relate to members’ commitment to mutuals and their trust in the commitment of others. We show that group-level embeddedness primarily affects trust, while individual embeddedness more strongly associates with commitment. We reveal these dynamics for mutuals of different ages using a unique multilevel dataset on the motivations, beliefs and social relations of more than 5000 members of 230 small Dutch mutuals. Our results highlight the importance of thinking critically about the levels at which social embeddedness plays a role, as the dynamics are more subtle and not all means of embeddedness are equally fruitful.

[1]  Tine De Moor,et al.  Mutuals on the Move: Exclusion Processes in the Welfare State and the Rediscovery of Mutualism , 2020 .

[2]  R. Vonk.  Mutual Insurance 1550–2015: From Guild Welfare and Friendly Societies to Contemporary Micro-Insurers by Marco H. D. van Leeuwen (review) , 2018 .

[3]  Rense Corten,et al.  Are bridging ties really advantageous? An experimental test of their advantage in a competitive social learning context , 2018, Soc. Networks.

[4]  Eva Vriens,et al.  Does the rise of the Internet bring erosion of strong ties? Analyses of social media use and changes in core discussion networks , 2017, New Media Soc..

[5]  M. V. Leeuwen.  Mutual Insurance 1550-2015 , 2016 .

[6]  M. Janssen,et al.  Irrigation experiments in the lab: trust, environmental variability, and collective action , 2015 .

[7]  Delia Baldassarri,et al.  Cooperative Networks: Altruism, Group Solidarity, Reciprocity, and Sanctioning in Ugandan Producer Organizations1 , 2015, American Journal of Sociology.

[8]  T. Moor.  The Dilemma of the Commoners: Understanding the Use of Common-Pool Resources in Long-Term Perspective , 2015 .

[9]  Penelope Ismay.  Between Providence and Risk: Odd Fellows, Benevolence and the Social Limits of Actuarial Science, 1820s–1880s , 2015 .

[10]  M. Praag,et al.  Risk, Uncertainty and Entrepreneurship: Evidence from a Lab-in-The-Field Experiment , 2014, Manag. Sci..

[11]  Sonja Opper,et al.  Entrepreneurs Under Uncertainty: An Economic Experiment in China , 2013, Manag. Sci..

[12]  A. Downing.  Social Capital in Decline: Friendly Societies in Australia, 1850-1914 , 2012 .

[13]  A. Barr,et al.  Who Shares Risk with Whom under Different Enforcement Mechanisms? , 2012, Economic Development and Cultural Change.

[14]  Costas Meghir,et al.  Risk Pooling, Risk Preferences, and Social Networks , 2012 .

[15]  Winter A. Mason,et al.  Collaborative learning in networks , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  Marc Schneiberg.  Toward an Organizationally Diverse American Capitalism? Cooperative, Mutual, and Local, State-Owned Enterprise , 2011 .

[17]  Tian Zheng,et al.  Segregation in Social Networks Based on Acquaintanceship and Trust , 2011, American Journal of Sociology.

[18]  Elinor Ostrom,et al.  Analyzing collective action , 2010 .

[19]  Giangiacomo Bravo,et al.  Voluntary contribution to public goods in mutual-help forums: reciprocity or group attachment? , 2010 .

[20]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Cooperation and Contagion in Web-Based, Networked Public Goods Experiments , 2010, SECO.

[21]  D. Balliet.  Communication and Cooperation in Social Dilemmas: A Meta-Analytic Review , 2010 .

[22]  M. Mobius,et al.  Directed Altruism and Enforced Reciprocity in Social Networks , 2009 .

[23]  B. Crona,et al.  The role of social networks in natural resource governance: What relational patterns make a difference? , 2009 .

[24]  Philippe LeMay-Boucher,et al.  Beninese and Ethiopian Informal Insurance Groups: A Comparative Analysis , 2009 .

[25]  K. Willis,et al.  Taking responsibility or averting risk? A socio-cultural approach to risk and trust in private health insurance decisions , 2008 .

[26]  D. Catterall.  Guilds, Innovation and the European Economy, 1400–1800 , 2008 .

[27]  Samuel Bowles,et al.  Policies Designed for Self-Interested Citizens May Undermine "The Moral Sentiments": Evidence from Economic Experiments , 2008, Science.

[28]  P. Haapasaari,et al.  Management measures and fishers' commitment to sustainable exploitation: a case study of Atlantic salmon fisheries in the Baltic Sea , 2007 .

[29]  John M. Anderies,et al.  Toward a network perspective of the study of resilience in social-ecological systems , 2006 .

[30]  Adrian. Sargeant,et al.  Trust and relationship commitment in the United Kingdom voluntary sector: Determinants of donor behavior , 2004 .

[31]  Amy R. Poteete,et al.  Heterogeneity, Group Size and Collective Action: The Role of Institutions in Forest Management , 2004 .

[32]  Suzan Ilcan *,et al.  Community government: voluntary agencies, social justice, and the responsibilization of citizens1 , 2004 .

[33]  D. Krackhardt.  The strength of strong ties: The importance of Philos in organizations , 2003 .

[34]  D. H. Mariam..  Indigenous social insurance as an alternative financing mechanism for health care in Ethiopia (the case of eders). , 2003, Social science & medicine.

[35]  C. Hauert,et al.  Volunteering as Red Queen Mechanism for Cooperation in Public Goods Games , 2002, Science.

[36]  Alain de Janvry,et al.  Localized and incomplete mutual insurance , 2002 .

[37]  Herbert Gintis,et al.  Behavioural science: Homo reciprocans , 2002, Nature.

[38]  Ethan Ligon,et al.  Informal Insurance Arrangements with Limited Commitment: Theory and Evidence from Village Economies , 2000 .

[39]  J. C. H. Emery,et al.  A Young Man's Benefit: The Independent Order of Odd Fellows and Sickness Insurance in the United States and Canada, 1860-1929 , 1999 .

[40]  Marcel Fafchamps,et al.  Risk Sharing Networks in Rural Philippines , 1997 .

[41]  J. Platteau.  Mutual insurance as an elusive concept in traditional rural communities , 1997 .

[42]  Michael W. Macy,et al.  The weakness of strong ties: Collective action failure in a highly cohesive group* , 1996 .

[43]  Gregory T. Gundlach,et al.  The Structure of Commitment in Exchange , 1995 .

[44]  P. Kollock.  The Emergence of Exchange Structures: An Experimental Study of Uncertainty, Commitment, and Trust , 1994, American Journal of Sociology.

[45]  T. Yamagishi,et al.  Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan , 1994 .

[46]  John P. Meyer,et al.  Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. , 1993 .

[47]  G. Brady.  Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action , 1993 .

[48]  Martin Ravallion,et al.  Reciprocity without commitment: Characterization and performance of informal insurance arrangements , 1993 .

[49]  Marcel Fafchamps,et al.  Solidarity Networks in Preindustrial Societies: Rational Peasants with a Moral Economy , 1992, Economic Development and Cultural Change.

[50]  E. Ostrom.  Governing the Commons: Index , 1990 .

[51]  W. Raub,et al.  Reputation and Efficiency in Social Interactions: An Example of Network Effects , 1990, American Journal of Sociology.

[52]  R. Bell,et al.  Between Profit and State: Intermediate Organizations in Britain and the United States. , 1989 .

[53]  David Krackhardt,et al.  Cognitive social structures , 1987 .

[54]  P. V. Marsden,et al.  Core Discussion Networks of Americans , 1987 .

[55]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[56]  John Orbell,et al.  Do Cooperators Exit More Readily than Defectors? , 1984, American Political Science Review.

[57]  F. Agneessens,et al.  Modelling individual outcomes using a multilevel social influence (MSI) model: Individual versus team effects of trust on job satisfaction in an organisational context , 2016 .

[58]  T. Moor.  The Dilemma of the Commoners , 2015 .

[59]  A. Evers,et al.  Onderzoeksnotitie: Een vernieuwd meetinstrument voor organizational commitment , 2010 .

[60]  M. Prak,et al.  Guilds, Innovation, and the European Economy, 1400–1800: Frontmatter , 2008 .

[61]  M. Lindén,et al.  Mutualist microfinance: informal savings funds from the global periphery to the core? , 2006 .

[62]  R. Grafton.  Social capital and fisheries governance , 2005 .

[63]  Robin I. M. Dunbar,et al.  Social network size in humans , 2003, Human nature.

[64]  F. Passy.  Social Networks Matter. But How , 2002 .

[65]  L. Freeman.  Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[66]  K. Arrow.  Essays in the theory of risk-bearing , 1958 .