Deficit in object detection (electrolocation) following interruption of cerebellar function in the weakly electric fish,Apteronotus albifrons

Neural units in the cerebella of electrosensitive gymnotid fish respond to objects which distort the fish's electric field 1-4. Those data suggest that in the cerebellum there is processing of afferent information relevant to object detection (electrolocation)S, 12,1~ mediated by the electrosensory system. The lesion and cold-block experiments described here test the hypothesis that the cerebellum plays an important role in object detection. Specimens, Apteronotus albifrons (Apteronotidae, Gymnotoidei) were bilaterally enucleated under tricaine methanesulfonate anesthesia at least 4 days prior to experimentation. Potentials associated with opercular and jaw excursions were recorded between a stainless steel wire electrode implanted in the musculature which controls the ventilation movements, and a second electrode in the water. The fish was held securely in a nylon mesh net in the center of a 27 cm × 121 cm × 27 cm aquarium filled with water adjusted to 2 K~Q. cm resistivity. Amplified signals were filtered (0 30 Hz pass band), displayed visually, and recorded with a polygraph. Plexiglas or aluminum objects which were mechanically moved anterior to posterior, parallel to the fish, elicited a reduction in frequency and amglitude of the opercular potentials (Fig. l). For data analysis only changes in fiequency were counted. The magnitude of this 'ventilation response' is a function of object distance (see Fig. 2A, solid dots, r . . . . 1, P -0.05, Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient). In two control experiments electrically transparent agar rods (Kalmijn, personal communication) failed to elicit consistent ventilation responses while the same fish responded reliably to similar Plexiglas rods. These controls and the fact that the fish were blinded indicate that the ventilation response is mediated by the electrosensory system. In the first experimental series 4 specimens, pre-selected on the basis of having

[1]  J. W. Meakin,et al.  Medical Physiology, vol 1. , 1969 .

[2]  K. E. Machin,et al.  The Mechanism of Object Location in Gymnarchus Niloticus and Similar Fish , 1958 .

[3]  H. Karten,et al.  Differential projections of ordinary lateral line receptors and electroreceptors in the gymnotid fish, Apteronotus (Sternarchus) albifrons , 1974, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[4]  A. Watanabe,et al.  The Change of Discharge Frequency by A.C. Stimulus in a Weak Electric Fish , 1963 .

[5]  T Szabo,et al.  Effect of temperature on the discharge rates of the electric organ of some gymnotids. , 1968, Comparative biochemistry and physiology.

[6]  R. Dow,et al.  The Physiology and Pathology of the Cerebellum , 1958 .

[7]  Bullock Th Seeing the world through a new sense: electroreception in fish. , 1973 .

[8]  Henning Scheich,et al.  The Detection of Electric Fields from Electric Organs , 1974 .

[9]  Henning Scheich,et al.  The Jamming Avoidance Response of High Frequency Electric Fish , 1972 .

[10]  J. Bastian Receptive fields of cerebellar cells receiving exteroceptive input in a Gymnotid fish. , 1975, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  L. Maler The acousticolateral area of bony fishes and its cerebellar relations. , 1974, Brain, behavior and evolution.

[12]  M. Sanders Handbook of Sensory Physiology , 1975 .

[13]  H Scheich,et al.  Neuronal Analysis of Wave Form in the Time Domain: Midbrain Units in Electric Fish during Social Behavior , 1974, Science.

[14]  Professor Dr. John C. Eccles,et al.  The Cerebellum as a Neuronal Machine , 1967, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.