Tissue mimicking simulations for temporal enhanced ultrasound-based tissue typing

Temporal enhanced ultrasound (TeUS) is an imaging approach where a sequence of temporal ultrasound data is acquired and analyzed for tissue typing. Previously, in a series of in vivo and ex vivo studies we have demonstrated that, this approach is effective for detecting prostate and breast cancers. Evidences derived from our experiments suggest that both ultrasound-signal related factors such as induced heat and tissue-related factors such as the distribution and micro-vibration of scatterers lead to tissue typing information in TeUS. In this work, we simulate mechanical micro-vibrations of scatterers in tissue-mimicking phantoms that have various scatterer densities reflecting benign and cancerous tissue structures. Finite element modeling (FEM) is used for this purpose where the vertexes are scatterers representing cell nuclei. The initial positions of scatterers are determined by the distribution of nuclei segmented from actual digital histology scans of prostate cancer patients. Subsequently, we generate ultrasound images of the simulated tissue structure using the Field II package resulting in a temporal enhanced ultrasound. We demonstrate that the micro-vibrations of scatterers are captured by temporal ultrasound data and this information can be exploited for tissue typing.

[1]  Michael C. Kolios,et al.  A model based upon pseudo regular spacing of cells combined with the randomisation of the nuclei can explain the significant changes in high-frequency ultrasound signals during apoptosis. , 2002, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[2]  Xuna Zhao,et al.  A feasibility study of MR elastography in the diagnosis of prostate cancer at 3.0T , 2011, Acta radiologica.

[3]  Purang Abolmaesumi,et al.  Tissue typing using ultrasound RF time series: experiments with animal tissue samples. , 2010, Medical physics.

[4]  J W Hunt,et al.  High-frequency ultrasound scattering from microspheres and single cells. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  Purang Abolmaesumi,et al.  Classifying Cancer Grades Using Temporal Ultrasound for Transrectal Prostate Biopsy , 2016, MICCAI.

[6]  Purang Abolmaesumi,et al.  Augmenting Detection of Prostate Cancer in Transrectal Ultrasound Images Using SVM and RF Time Series , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  Purang Abolmaesumi,et al.  A new approach to ultrasonic detection of malignant breast tumors , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS).

[8]  Wei Huang,et al.  Digital quantification of five high-grade prostate cancer patterns, including the cribriform pattern, and their association with adverse outcome. , 2011, American journal of clinical pathology.

[9]  Andras Lasso,et al.  Ultrasound-Guided Characterization of Interstitial Ablated Tissue Using RF Time Series: Feasibility Study , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  Jørgen Jensen,et al.  Simulation of advanced ultrasound systems using Field II , 2004, 2004 2nd IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Nano to Macro (IEEE Cat No. 04EX821).

[11]  Purang Abolmaesumi,et al.  Tissue Classification Using Ultrasound-Induced Variations in Acoustic Backscattering Features , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  M Meselson,et al.  THE REPLICATION OF DNA IN ESCHERICHIA COLI. , 1958, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  Purang Abolmaesumi,et al.  Computer-Aided Prostate Cancer Detection Using Ultrasound RF Time Series: In Vivo Feasibility Study , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.