Comparison of the energy efficiency to produce agroethanol between various industries and processes: Synthesis

Abstract The article assesses the energy R required by a system to transform a cereal or sugar plant into ethanol. From the specific consumption rj of each process j and its weight wj in the system, process consumption share Rj is deduced and hence R, sum of Rj. Depending on wj definition, Rj and R are relative to either 100 J of ethanol produced or 100 J of plant harvested. Depending on the nature of rj, Rj and R represent either only primary external energies, or all fuel and electricity consumed directly, or external and internal energies. From one definition to another R for average sugar cane based industries is the best or the worst relative to other plants. This results also from the use of cane residues as fuels while operating outdated processes. Through rj the process based analysis allows to examine for each system the impact of modern processes or different use of residues. All systems benefit except sugar beet based industry close to its best efficiency. This flexibility permits even to build a self-sufficient system where existing processes produce from system resources substitutes to external energies. R becomes an unambiguous definition of a system efficiency. It shows that all agroethanol systems are more consuming than petroleum industry. The system can be expanded to the vehicle stage to compare with alternatives to ethanol such as electricity and biogas. Wheat straw burnt to produce electricity used in an electrical vehicle will present R close to that of petroleum industry.

[1]  J. Ivy,et al.  Summary of Electrolytic Hydrogen Production , 2004 .

[2]  Vignali Marinka,et al.  Biofuels Versus Diesel and Gasoline in the JEC-WTW Report Version 2c - An Extract from the 'Well-to-Wheels Analysis of Future Automotive Fuels and Powertrains in the European Context', Ver. 2c March 2007 , 2008 .

[3]  Xavier Chavanne,et al.  Le rendement énergétique de la production d’éthanol à partir de maïs , 2008 .

[4]  D. Lide Handbook of Chemistry and Physics , 1992 .

[5]  Nicolas Jeuland,et al.  Potentiality of Ethanol As a Fuel for Dedicated Engine , 2004 .

[6]  James D. Coan,et al.  Fundamentals of a Sustainable U.S. Biofuels Policy , 2010 .

[7]  A. Kunz,et al.  Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento Secretaria de Produção e Agroenergia , 2011 .

[8]  Aie World Energy Outlook 2005 , 2005 .

[9]  J. Frangi,et al.  Comparison of the energy efficiency to produce agroethanol between various industries and processes: The transport stage , 2011 .

[10]  Aie Energy Efficiency Indicators for Public Electricity Production from Fossil Fuels , 2009 .

[11]  Xavier Chavanne,et al.  De la détermination du rendement des filières énergétiques , 2007 .

[12]  Vincent Mahieu,et al.  Well-to-wheels analysis of future automotive fuels and powertrains in the european context , 2004 .

[13]  Paul W. Gallagher,et al.  Ethanol Industry Outlook , 2004 .

[14]  Dennis L. Meadows,et al.  Limits to growth : the 30-year update , 2004 .

[15]  I. Angelidaki,et al.  A comprehensive model of anaerobic bioconversion of complex substrates to biogas , 1999, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[16]  J. Laherrère,et al.  The End of Cheap Oil , 1998 .

[17]  J. Seabra,et al.  Green house gases emissions in the production and use of ethanol from sugarcane in Brazil: the 2005/2006 averages and a prediction for 2020. , 2008 .

[18]  Arnaldo Walter,et al.  Sustainability of Brazilian bio-ethanol , 2006 .

[19]  Bert Metz,et al.  Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage , 2005 .

[20]  M. Wang,et al.  Well-to-wheel energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of advanced fuel/vehicle systems North American analysis. , 2001 .