ON THE BEHAVIOR OF FIXED-b TREND BREAK TESTS UNDER FRACTIONAL INTEGRATION

Testing for the presence of a broken linear trend when the nature of the persistence in the data is unknown is not a trivial problem, because the test needs to be both asymptotically correctly sized and consistent, regardless of the order of integration of the data. In a recent paper, Sayginsoy and Vogelsang (2011, Econometric Theory 27, 992–1025) (SV) show that tests based on fixed-b asymptotics provide a useful solution to this problem in the case where the shocks may be either weakly dependent or display strong dependence within the near-unit-root class. In this paper we analyze the performance of these tests when the shocks may be fractionally integrated, an alternative model paradigm that allows for either weak or strong dependence in the shocks. We demonstrate that the fixed-b trend break statistics converge to well-defined limit distributions under both the null and local alternatives in this case (and retain consistency against fixed alternatives), but that these distributions depend on the fractional integration parameter δ. As a result, it is only when δ is either zero or one that the SV critical values yield correctly sized tests. Consequently, we propose a procedure that employs δ-adaptive critical values to remove the size distortions in the SV test. In addition, use of δ-adaptive critical values also allows us to consider a simplification of the SV test that is (asymptotically) correctly sized across δ but can also provide a significant increase in power over the standard SV test when δ = 1.

[1]  D. Andrews,et al.  Optimal Tests When a Nuisance Parameter Is Present Only Under the Alternative , 1992 .

[2]  P. Perron,et al.  The Great Crash, The Oil Price Shock And The Unit Root Hypothesis , 1989 .

[3]  Domenico Marinucci,et al.  Alternative forms of fractional Brownian motion , 1998 .

[4]  Timothy J. Vogelsang,et al.  Testing for a Shift in Mean Without Having to Estimate Serial-Correlation Parameters , 1998 .

[5]  B. Christensen,et al.  A unified framework for testing in the linear regression model under unknown order of fractional integration , 2013 .

[6]  P. Robinson,et al.  Cointegration in fractional systems with deterministic trends , 2005 .

[7]  Philipp Sibbertsen,et al.  Long memory versus structural breaks: An overview , 2004 .

[8]  David Harris,et al.  TESTING FOR A UNIT ROOT IN THE PRESENCE OF A POSSIBLE BREAK IN TREND , 2009, Econometric Theory.

[9]  Pierre Perron,et al.  Dealing with Structural Breaks , 2005 .

[10]  Domenico Marinucci,et al.  Weak convergence of multivariate fractional processes , 2000 .

[11]  N. Davies Multiple Time Series , 2005 .

[12]  Nicholas M. Kiefer,et al.  HETEROSKEDASTICITY-AUTOCORRELATION ROBUST STANDARD ERRORS USING THE BARTLETT KERNEL WITHOUT TRUNCATION , 2002 .

[13]  A Necessary Moment Condition for the Fractional Functional Central Limit Theorem , 2010 .

[14]  Timothy J. Vogelsang,et al.  TESTING FOR A SHIFT IN TREND AT AN UNKNOWN DATE: A FIXED-B ANALYSIS OF HETEROSKEDASTICITY AUTOCORRELATION ROBUST OLS-BASED TESTS , 2011, Econometric Theory.

[15]  Liudas Giraitis,et al.  Nonstationarity-Extended Local Whittle Estimation , 2006 .

[16]  Helle Bunzel,et al.  Powerful Trend Function Tests That Are Robust to Strong Serial Correlation, With an Application to the Prebisch–Singer Hypothesis , 2005 .

[17]  David I. Harvey,et al.  SIMPLE, ROBUST, AND POWERFUL TESTS OF THE BREAKING TREND HYPOTHESIS , 2009, Econometric Theory.

[18]  Pierre Perron,et al.  Structural breaks with deterministic and stochastic trends , 2005 .

[19]  D. Andrews,et al.  Further Evidence on the Great Crash, the Oil-Price Shock, and the Unit-Root Hypothesis , 1992 .