Electrocardiogram-synchronized rotational speed change mode in rotary pumps could improve pulsatility.

Continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have greatly improved the prognosis of patients with end-stage heart failure, even if continuous flow is different from physiological flow in that it has less pulsatility. A novel pump controller of continuous-flow LVADs has been developed, which can change its rotational speed (RS) in synchronization with the native cardiac cycle, and we speculated that pulsatile mode, which increases RS just in the systolic phase, can create more pulsatility than the current system with constant RS does. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the effect of this pulsatile mode of continuous-flow LVADs on pulsatility in in vivo settings. Experiments were performed on eight adult goats (61.7 ± 7.5 kg). A centrifugal pump, EVAHEART (Sun Medical Technology Research Corporation, Nagano, Japan), was installed by the apex drainage and the descending aortic perfusion. A pacing lead for the detection of ventricular electrocardiogram was sutured on the anterior wall of the right ventricle. In the present study, we compared pulse pressure or other parameters in the following three conditions, including Circuit-Clamp (i.e., no pump support), Continuous mode (constant RS), and Pulsatile mode (increase RS in systole). Assist rate was calculated by dividing pump flow (PF) by the sum of PF and ascending aortic flow (AoF). In continuous and pulsatile modes, these assist rates were adjusted around 80-90%. The following three parameters were used to evaluate pulsatility, including pulse pressure, dp/dt of aortic pressure (AoP), and energy equivalent pulse pressure (EEP = (∫PF*AoP dt)/(∫PF dt), mm Hg). The percent difference between EEP and mean AoP is used as an indicator of pulsatility, and normally it is around 10% of mean AoP in physiological pulse. Both pulse pressure and mean dp/dt max were decreased in continuous mode compared with clamp condition, while those were regained by pulsatile mode nearly to clamp condition (pulse pressure, clamp/continuous/pulsatile, 25.0 ± 7.6/11.7 ± 6.4/22.6 ± 9.8 mm Hg, mean dp/dt max, 481.9 ± 207.6/75.6 ± 36.2/351.1 ± 137.8 mm Hg/s, respectively). In clamp condition, %EEP was 10% higher than mean AoP (P = 0.0078), while in continuous mode, %EEP was nearly equivalent to mean AoP (N.S.). In pulsatile mode, %EEP was 9% higher than mean AoP (P = 0.038). Our newly developed pulsatile mode of continuous-flow LVADs can produce pulsatility comparable to physiological pulsatile flow. Further investigation on the effect of this novel drive mode on organ perfusion is currently ongoing.

[1]  A Undar,et al.  Pulsatile and nonpulsatile flows can be quantified in terms of energy equivalent pressure during cardiopulmonary bypass for direct comparisons. , 1999, ASAIO journal.

[2]  G Wright,et al.  Hemodynamic analysis could resolve the pulsatile blood flow controversy. , 1994, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[3]  John L. Myers,et al.  Precise Quantification of Pressure Flow Waveforms of a Pulsatile Ventricular Assist Device , 2005, ASAIO journal.

[4]  A Undar,et al.  Defining pulsatile perfusion: quantification in terms of energy equivalent pressure. , 1999, Artificial organs.

[5]  Christopher S Lucci,et al.  Effect of Continuous and Pulsatile Flow Left Ventricular Assist on Pulsatility in a Pediatric Animal Model of Left Ventricular Dysfunction: Pilot Observations , 2007, ASAIO journal.

[6]  Andrew Boyle,et al.  Gastrointestinal bleeding rates in recipients of nonpulsatile and pulsatile left ventricular assist devices. , 2009, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[7]  S Murabayashi,et al.  Development of rotary blood pump technology: past, present, and future. , 2000, Artificial organs.

[8]  William A. Smith,et al.  Reduced pulsatility induces periarteritis in kidney: role of the local renin-angiotensin system. , 2008, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[9]  O. Frazier,et al.  End-organ function in patients on long-term circulatory support with continuous- or pulsatile-flow assist devices. , 2007, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[10]  S. Russell,et al.  Advanced heart failure treated with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  Y Taenaka,et al.  Diminished vasoconstrictive function caused by long-term nonpulsatile left heart bypass. , 1999, Artificial organs.

[12]  Kevin Bourque,et al.  In vivo assessment of a rotary left ventricular assist device-induced artificial pulse in the proximal and distal aorta. , 2006, Artificial organs.

[13]  Andrew Boyle,et al.  Effects of centrifugal, axial, and pulsatile left ventricular assist device support on end-organ function in heart failure patients. , 2008, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[14]  Maria Frigerio,et al.  Clinical outcome and bridge to transplant rate of left ventricular assist device recipient patients: comparison between continuous-flow and pulsatile-flow devices. , 2008, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[15]  Biswajit Kar,et al.  Assessment of arterial blood pressure during support with an axial flow left ventricular assist device. , 2009, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[16]  Akif Undar,et al.  Myths and truths of pulsatile and nonpulsatile perfusion during acute and chronic cardiac support. , 2004, Artificial organs.

[17]  T. Nishinaka,et al.  Prolonged Nonpulsatile Left Heart Bypass Diminishes Vascular Contractility , 1999, The International journal of artificial organs.

[18]  Y Taenaka,et al.  Prolonged nonpulsatile left heart bypass with reduced systemic pulse pressure causes morphological changes in the aortic wall. , 1998, Artificial organs.

[19]  Dong Chen,et al.  Comparative Analysis of von Willebrand Factor Profiles in Pulsatile and Continuous Left Ventricular Assist Device Recipients , 2010, ASAIO journal.

[20]  M. Slaughter,et al.  Hemodynamic Responses to Continuous versus Pulsatile Mechanical Unloading of the Failing Left Ventricle , 2010, ASAIO journal.

[21]  Y Taenaka,et al.  Effects of long-term nonpulsatile left heart bypass on the mechanical properties of the aortic wall. , 1999, ASAIO journal.

[22]  R. Hetzer,et al.  Differences in pulsatile and non-pulsatile mechanical circulatory support in long-term use , 2007 .

[23]  Mitsuo Umezu,et al.  EVAHEART: an implantable centrifugal blood pump for long-term circulatory support. , 2002, The Japanese journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official publication of the Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery = Nihon Kyobu Geka Gakkai zasshi.

[24]  B. Griffith,et al.  Clinical outcomes are similar in pulsatile and nonpulsatile left ventricular assist device recipients. , 2007, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[25]  S. Garcia,et al.  Effects of pulsatile- and continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices on left ventricular unloading. , 2008, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[26]  Jeffrey R. Gohean,et al.  Improved left ventricular unloading and circulatory support with synchronized pulsatile left ventricular assistance compared with continuous-flow left ventricular assistance in an acute porcine left ventricular failure model. , 2010, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[27]  Ernst Wolner,et al.  Renal function after implantation of continuous versus pulsatile flow left ventricular assist devices. , 2008, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[28]  F. Pagani,et al.  Hemodynamic and Exercise Performance With Pulsatile and Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices , 2007, Circulation.

[29]  H. Scheld,et al.  Left ventricular pressure and volume unloading during pulsatile versus nonpulsatile left ventricular assist device support. , 2004, The Annals of thoracic surgery.