Phenotypic heterogeneity can enhance rare‐cell survival in ‘stress‐sensitive’ yeast populations

Individual cells within isogenic microbial cultures exhibit phenotypic heterogeneity, an issue that is attracting intense interest. Heterogeneity could confer benefits, in generating variant subpopulations that may be better equipped to persist during perturbation. We tested this hypothesis by comparing the survival of wild‐type Saccharomyces cerevisiae with that of mutants which are considered stress‐sensitive but which, we demonstrate, also have increased heterogeneity. The mutants (e.g. vma3, ctr1, sod1) exhibited the anticipated sensitivities to intermediate doses of nickel, copper, alkaline pH, menadione or paraquat. However, enhanced heterogeneity meant that the resistances of individual mutant cells spanned a broad range, and at high stress occasional‐cell survival in most of these populations overtook that of the wild type. Green fluorescent protein (GFP) reporter studies showed that this heterogeneity‐dependent advantage was not related to perturbation of buffered gene expression. Deletion strain screens combined with other approaches revealed that vacuolar alkalinization resulting from loss of Vma‐dependent vacuolar H+‐ATPase activity was not the cause of vma mutants' net stress sensitivities. An alternative Vma‐dependent resistance mechanism was found to suppress an influence of variable vacuolar pH on the metal resistances of individual wild‐type cells. In addition to revealing new mechanisms of heterogeneity generation, the results demonstrate experimentally a benefit under adverse conditions that arises specifically from heterogeneity, and in populations conventionally considered to be disadvantaged.

[1]  M. Inouhe,et al.  Nickel resistance mechanisms in yeasts and other fungi , 1995, Journal of Industrial Microbiology.

[2]  S. Avery,et al.  Genome-Wide Screening of Saccharomyces cerevisiae To Identify Genes Required for Antibiotic Insusceptibility of Eukaryotes , 2003, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[3]  A. Bergman,et al.  Evolutionary capacitance as a general feature of complex gene networks , 2003, Nature.

[4]  S. Avery,et al.  Flow cytometric investigation of heterogeneous copper-sensitivity in asynchronously grown Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1999, FEMS microbiology letters.

[5]  G. Fink,et al.  Methods in yeast genetics , 1979 .

[6]  Jeffrey W. Smith,et al.  Stochastic Gene Expression in a Single Cell , 2022 .

[7]  D. Thiele,et al.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutants altered in vacuole function are defective in copper detoxification and iron‐responsive gene transcription , 1997, Yeast.

[8]  D. Hedley,et al.  Flow cytometric measurement of cytoplasmic pH: a critical evaluation of available fluorochromes. , 1986, Cytometry.

[9]  S. Avery,et al.  Destabilized green fluorescent protein for monitoring dynamic changes in yeast gene expression with flow cytometry , 2000, Yeast.

[10]  R. Sikorski,et al.  A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1989, Genetics.

[11]  P. Roach,et al.  Systematic Identification of the Genes Affecting Glycogen Storage in the Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2002, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[12]  P. Kane,et al.  A Genomic Screen for Yeast Vacuolar Membrane ATPase Mutants , 2005, Genetics.

[13]  R. Hirata,et al.  Molecular genetics of the yeast vacuolar H(+)-ATPase. , 1992, The Journal of experimental biology.

[14]  Yudong D. He,et al.  Functional Discovery via a Compendium of Expression Profiles , 2000, Cell.

[15]  Mark Gerstein,et al.  Predicting interactions in protein networks by completing defective cliques , 2006, Bioinform..

[16]  E. O’Shea,et al.  Noise in protein expression scales with natural protein abundance , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[17]  T. Elston,et al.  Stochasticity in gene expression: from theories to phenotypes , 2005, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[18]  H. Mewes,et al.  The FunCat, a functional annotation scheme for systematic classification of proteins from whole genomes. , 2004, Nucleic acids research.

[19]  P. Philippsen,et al.  Heterologous HIS3 Marker and GFP Reporter Modules for PCR‐Targeting in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1997, Yeast.

[20]  Michael Knop,et al.  A versatile toolbox for PCR‐based tagging of yeast genes: new fluorescent proteins, more markers and promoter substitution cassettes , 2004, Yeast.

[21]  E. O’Shea,et al.  Global analysis of protein localization in budding yeast , 2003, Nature.

[22]  T. Stevens,et al.  STRUCTURE, FUNCTION AND REGULATION OF THE VACUOLAR , 1997 .

[23]  D. Eide,et al.  The vacuolar H+-ATPase of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is required for efficient copper detoxification, mitochondrial function, and iron metabolism , 1993, Molecular and General Genetics MGG.

[24]  A. Miseta,et al.  The intracellular dissipation of cytosolic calcium following glucose re‐addition to carbohydrate depleted Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2004, FEBS letters.

[25]  J. Valentine,et al.  Induction of phenotypes resembling CuZn-superoxide dismutase deletion in wild-type yeast cells: an in vivo assay for the role of superoxide in the toxicity of redox-cycling compounds. , 2005, Chemical research in toxicology.

[26]  S. Grinstein,et al.  Alternative Mechanisms of Vacuolar Acidification in H+-ATPase-deficient Yeast* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[27]  M. Thattai,et al.  Stochastic Gene Expression in Fluctuating Environments , 2004, Genetics.

[28]  D. Kosman,et al.  Homeostatic Regulation of Copper Uptake in Yeast via Direct Binding of MAC1 Protein to Upstream Regulatory Sequences ofFRE1 and CTR1 * , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[29]  S. Avery,et al.  Cell cycle‐ and age‐dependent activation of Sod1p drives the formation of stress resistant cell subpopulations within clonal yeast cultures , 2003, Molecular microbiology.

[30]  N. Perzov,et al.  Characterization of yeast V-ATPase mutants lacking Vph1p or Stv1p and the effect on endocytosis. , 2002, The Journal of experimental biology.

[31]  J. Strathern,et al.  Methods in yeast genetics : a Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory course manual , 2005 .

[32]  H. Joh,et al.  A Physiological Role for Saccharomyces cerevisiae Copper/Zinc Superoxide Dismutase in Copper Buffering (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[33]  T. Stevens,et al.  Structure, function and regulation of the vacuolar (H+)-ATPase. , 1997, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[34]  R. Hirata,et al.  Vacuolar H(+)-ATPase and plasma membrane H(+)-ATPase contribute to the tolerance against high-pressure carbon dioxide treatment in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2005, International journal of food microbiology.

[35]  J. Raser,et al.  Control of Stochasticity in Eukaryotic Gene Expression , 2004, Science.

[36]  J. Derisi,et al.  Single-cell proteomic analysis of S. cerevisiae reveals the architecture of biological noise , 2006, Nature.

[37]  J. Valentine,et al.  Null mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Cu,Zn superoxide dismutase: characterization and spontaneous mutation rates , 1991, Journal of bacteriology.

[38]  K. Salnikow,et al.  Molecular biology of nickel carcinogenesis , 1997, Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry.

[39]  J. Bonifacino,et al.  Copper‐dependent degradation of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae plasma membrane copper transporter Ctr1p in the apparent absence of endocytosis. , 1996, The EMBO journal.

[40]  Simon V. Avery,et al.  Microbial cell individuality and the underlying sources of heterogeneity , 2006, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[41]  S. Lindquist,et al.  Hsp90 as a capacitor for morphological evolution , 1998, Nature.

[42]  A. E. Hirsh,et al.  Noise Minimization in Eukaryotic Gene Expression , 2004, PLoS biology.

[43]  D. Volfson,et al.  Origins of extrinsic variability in eukaryotic gene expression , 2006, Nature.

[44]  C. Giulivi,et al.  Superoxide dismutases and their impact upon human health. , 2005, Molecular aspects of medicine.

[45]  G. Gadd,et al.  Mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae defective in vacuolar function confirm a role for the vacuole in toxic metal ion detoxification. , 1997, FEMS microbiology letters.

[46]  P. Attfield,et al.  Involvement of oxidative stress response genes in redox homeostasis, the level of reactive oxygen species, and ageing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2005, FEMS yeast research.

[47]  I. Booth,et al.  Stress and the single cell: intrapopulation diversity is a mechanism to ensure survival upon exposure to stress. , 2002, International journal of food microbiology.

[48]  N. Friedman,et al.  Stochastic protein expression in individual cells at the single molecule level , 2006, Nature.

[49]  Edward R Sumner,et al.  Phenotypic heterogeneity: differential stress resistance among individual cells of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2002, Microbiology.

[50]  P. Kane The Where, When, and How of Organelle Acidification by the Yeast Vacuolar H+-ATPase , 2006, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.

[51]  R F Murphy,et al.  Assay of vacuolar pH in yeast and identification of acidification-defective mutants. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[52]  G. Lauquin,et al.  The Saccharomyces cerevisiae LYS7 gene is involved in oxidative stress protection. , 1998, European journal of biochemistry.