Collaborative Architecture supporting the next generation of MDAO within the AGILE paradigm

Abstract The AGILE project has developed the next generation of aircraft Multidisciplinary Design and Optimization processes providing significant reductions in aircraft development costs and time to market - ultimately leading to more cost-effective and greener aircraft solutions. A novel product development methodology is formulated, enabling collaborative, large scale design and optimization processes. The main elements enabling the developed “AGILE Paradigm” are the Knowledge Architecture and the Collaborative Architecture. The Knowledge Architecture formalizes setting up the product development process. It guides the engineers in formulating the design problem and choosing the appropriate solution strategy. This paper focuses on the Collaborative Architecture, which at its turn formalizes the way in which the involved agents interact within the product development process and enables cross-organizational and cross-the-nation integration of design competences. The principles of the architecture are of a non-intrusive nature and allow legacy processes to be connected in fully automated cross-organization collaborative design workflows. Within the project, it is used to seamlessly integrate the capabilities of nineteen project partners located in nine different countries. A realistic aircraft design use case – addressing an automated systems-of-systems analysis involving the design competences of multiple project partners – demonstrates a working implementation of the Collaborative Architecture. The effective interconnection of simulation capabilities between organizations allows the agents to spend more time on creative, knowledge-intensive design tasks - opening new possibilities for collaboratively resolving the future challenges faced by the aerospace and other industries.

[1]  Artur Mirzoyan,et al.  Uncertainty quantification and robust design optimization applied to aircraft propulsion systems , 2018 .

[2]  S. Fawcett,et al.  Benefits, barriers, and bridges to effective supply chain management , 2008 .

[3]  Timo Laudan,et al.  Integrate Engine Manufacturer's Knowledge into the Preliminary Aircraft Sizing Process , 2014 .

[4]  Richard Barker,et al.  CASE method fast-track - a RAD approach , 1994 .

[5]  Volker Gollnick,et al.  Communication in aircraft design : Can we establish a common language? , 2012 .

[6]  Pier Davide Ciampa,et al.  A clustered and surrogate-based MDA use case for MDO scenarios in AGILE project , 2018, 2018 Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference.

[7]  Gary Belie.  Non-Technical Barriers to Multidisciplinary Optimization in the Aerospace Industry , 2002 .

[8]  Björn Nagel,et al.  Collaborative aircraft design using an integrated and distributed multidisciplinary product development process , 2016 .

[9]  Sobieszczanski Jaroslaw,et al.  Bi-Level Integrated System Synthesis (BLISS) , 1998 .

[10]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  Extensions to the design structure matrix for the description of multidisciplinary design, analysis, and optimization processes , 2012, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization.

[11]  A. J. de Wit,et al.  Collaborative Engineering Technologies Enabling Multi-Partner Thermal Analysis In Early Design Stages Of Aircraft , 2016 .

[12]  Maurice F. M. Hoogreef,et al.  CMDOWS: a proposed new standard to store and exchange MDO systems , 2018 .

[13]  Riccardo Lombardi,et al.  Automated Selection of the Optimal On-board Systems Architecture within MDO Collaborative Environment , 2017 .

[14]  A. Salter,et al.  Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university–industry collaboration , 2009 .

[15]  Marin D. Guenov,et al.  Advances in Collaborative Civil Aeronautical Multidisciplinary Design Optimization , 2009 .

[16]  Tobias Stollenwerk,et al.  TiGL: An Open Source Computational Geometry Library for Parametric Aircraft Design , 2018, Mathematics in Computer Science.

[17]  Carsten M. Liersch,et al.  On the Design of a Strut-Braced Wing Configuration in a Collaborative Design Environment , 2017 .

[18]  Björn Nagel,et al.  Collaborative understanding of disciplinary correlations using a low-fidelity physics-based aerospace toolkit , 2015 .

[19]  Pier Davide Ciampa,et al.  Distributed Multidisciplinary Optimization and Collaborative Process Development Using RCE , 2019, AIAA Aviation 2019 Forum.

[20]  John E. Renaud,et al.  Response surface based, concurrent subspace optimization for multidisciplinary system design , 1996 .

[21]  Luca Boggero,et al.  ASTRID - aircraft on board systems sizing and trade-off analysis in initial design , 2012 .

[22]  G. La Rocca,et al.  A Fully Automated Chain from MDAO Problem Formulation to Workflow Execution , 2017 .

[23]  E. J. Schut,et al.  Design and implementation of a new generation multi-agent task environment framework , 2008 .

[24]  Mengmeng Zhang,et al.  Advanced turboprop multidisciplinary design and optimization within AGILE project , 2018, 2018 Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference.

[25]  James Barron,et al.  Streamlining cross-organisation product design in aeronautics , 2017 .

[26]  Pier Davide Ciampa,et al.  Aeroelastic Design and Optimization of Unconventional Aircraft Configurations in a Distributed Design Environment , 2012 .