Cross-cultural differences in driving skills: a comparison of six countries.

The first aim of the present study was to investigate the applicability of the two-factor structure (perceptual-motor skills by 11 items, e.g., "fluent driving"; safety skills by 9 items, e.g., "conforming to the speed limits") of the Driver Skill Inventory (DSI) among British, Dutch, Finnish, Greek, Iranian, and Turkish drivers. It was also hypothesized that the combination of self reported high ratings of perceptual-motor skills and low ratings of safety skills creates a serious risk for dangerous driving and road accident involvement. The second aim of this study was, therefore, to investigate this asymmetric relationship between perceptual-motor and safety skills in traffic penalties and accident involvement. Two hundred and forty two drivers were chosen from each of the six countries, matched for age and sex. The results of exploratory factor analyses together with target rotation showed that the two-factor structure of DSI found in "safe" Northern and Western European countries were highly congruent. However, the safety skills factor of DSI in Greece, Iran, and Turkey was relatively incongruent in spite of high factor similarity found in perceptual-motor skills. The asymmetric relationship between perceptual-motor and safety skills on traffic penalties was found in Finland and Turkey. A negative relationship between safety skills and the number of accidents was found both in Greece and Iran while a positive relationship between perceptual-motor skills and the number of accidents was found only in Iran.

[1]  M Sivak,et al.  Cross-cultural differences in driver self-assessment. , 1989, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[2]  Heikki Summala,et al.  The Manchester Driver Behaviour Questionnaire: a cross-cultural study. , 2004, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[3]  I Lewin,et al.  Driver training: a perceptual-motor skill approach. , 1982, Ergonomics.

[4]  John A. Groeger,et al.  Risk perception and decision taking during the transition between novice and experienced driver status , 1988 .

[5]  A. Manstead,et al.  The Role of Affect in Predicting Social Behaviors: The Case of Road Traffic Violations , 1997 .

[6]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Road user behavior and traffic accidents , 1976 .

[7]  M L Matthews,et al.  Age differences in male drivers' perception of accident risk: the role of perceived driving ability. , 1986, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[8]  Heikki Summala,et al.  Cross-cultural differences in driving behaviours: A comparison of six countries , 2006 .

[9]  B. O'Connor,et al.  SIMPLE: All-in-One Programs for Exploring Interactions in Moderated Multiple Regression , 1998 .

[10]  J. M. F. Ten Berge.  Rotatie naar perfecte congruentie en de multipele groep methode , 1986 .

[11]  T. Lajunen,et al.  Can we trust self-reports of driving? Effects of impression management on driver behaviour questionnaire responses , 2003 .

[12]  T. Lajunen,et al.  Driving experience, personality, and skill and safety-motive dimensions in drivers' self-assessments , 1995 .

[13]  D. Walton,et al.  Examining the self-enhancement bias: professional truck drivers’ perceptions of speed, safety, skill and consideration , 1999 .

[14]  Heikki Summala,et al.  Cross-cultural differences in Drivers' self-assessments of their perceptual-motor and safety skills: Australians and Finns , 1998 .

[15]  Pierre R. Dasen,et al.  Cross-Cultural Psychology: Research and Applications , 1992 .

[16]  N P Gregersen,et al.  Young drivers' overestimation of their own skill--an experiment on the relation between training strategy and skill. , 1996, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[17]  S. West,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. , 1994 .

[18]  M Sivak.  Human factors and road safety. Overview of research at the University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute between 1977 and 1986. , 1987, Applied ergonomics.

[19]  Timo Lajunen,et al.  Asymmetric relationship between driving and safety skills. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[20]  D. French,et al.  Behavioral correlates of individual differences in road-traffic crash risk: an examination method and findings. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[21]  F.J.R. van de Vijver,et al.  Methods and Data Analysis for Cross-Cultural Research , 1997 .

[22]  M Sivak,et al.  Cross-cultural differences in driver risk-taking. , 1989, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[23]  F. McKenna,et al.  Factors underlying illusory self-assessment of driving skill in males and females. , 1991, Accident Analysis and Prevention.

[24]  Frank P. McKenna,et al.  It won't happen to me: Unrealistic optimism or illusion of control? , 1993 .

[25]  D. Parker,et al.  Dimensions of driver anger, aggressive and highway code violations and their mediation by safety orientation in UK drivers , 1998 .

[26]  P. Ulleberg.  PERSONALITY SUBTYPES OF YOUNG DRIVERS. RELATIONSHIP TO RISK-TAKING PREFERENCES, ACCIDENT INVOLVEMENT, AND RESPONSE TO A TRAFFIC SAFETY CAMPAIGN , 2001 .

[27]  Georgia Tzamalouka,et al.  Lifestyle Traits as Predictors of Driving Behaviour in Urban Areas of Greece , 2005 .