Basic ICT adoption and use by general practitioners: an analysis of primary care systems in 31 European countries

BackgroundThere is general consensus that appropriate development and use of information and communication technologies (ICT) are crucial in the delivery of effective primary care (PC). Several countries are defining policies to support and promote a structural change of the health care system through the introduction of ICT. This study analyses the state of development of basic ICT in PC systems of 31 European countries with the aim to describe the extent of, and main purposes for, computer use by General Practitioners (GPs) across Europe. Additionally, trends over time have been analysed.MethodsDescriptive statistical analysis was performed on data from the QUALICOPC (Quality and Costs of Primary Care in Europe) survey, to describe the geographic differences in the general use of computer, and in specific computerized clinical functions for different health-related purposes such as prescribing, medication checking, generating health records and research for medical information on the Internet.ResultsWhile all the countries have achieved a near-universal adoption of a computer in their primary care practices, with only a few countries near or under the boundary of 90 %, the computerisation of primary care clinical functions presents a wide variability of adoption within and among countries and, in several cases (such as in the southern and central-eastern Europe), a large room for improvement.ConclusionsAt European level, more efforts could be done to support southern and central-eastern Europe in closing the gap in adoption and use of ICT in PC. In particular, more attention seems to be need on the current usages of the computer in PC, by focusing policies and actions on the improvement of the appropriate usages that can impact on quality and costs of PC and can facilitate an interconnected health care system. However, policies and investments seem necessary but not sufficient to achieve these goals. Organizational, behavioural and also networking aspects should be taken in consideration.

[1]  Joanne Callen,et al.  An Information System's Contribution to Work Satisfaction: Differing Perspectives between Doctors and Nurses , 2008 .

[2]  Terhilda Garrido,et al.  Effect of electronic health records in ambulatory care: retrospective, serial, cross sectional study , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[3]  R. Stafford,et al.  Electronic health records and clinical decision support systems: impact on national ambulatory care quality. , 2011, Archives of internal medicine.

[4]  C. Chronaki,et al.  European citizens' use of E-health services: A study of seven countries , 2007, BMC public health.

[5]  W. Boerma Profiles of general practice in Europe : an international study of variation in the tasks of general practitioners , 2003 .

[6]  M. Jones,et al.  Is primary care ready to embrace e-health? A qualitative study of staff in a London primary care trust. , 2006, Informatics in primary care.

[7]  Sarah Thomson,et al.  International profiles of health care systems, 2012 , 2012 .

[8]  B. Lo,et al.  The Impact of Web 2.0 on the Doctor-Patient Relationship , 2010, Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics.

[9]  Jeffrey Braithwaite,et al.  Will information and communication technology disrupt the health system and deliver on its promise? , 2010, The Medical journal of Australia.

[10]  Vienonen Ma,et al.  Health care reforms on the European scene: evolution, revolution or seesaw? , 1993 .

[11]  L. Schilling,et al.  Systematic Review of Health Information Exchange in Primary Care Practices , 2010, The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine.

[12]  D. Blumenthal Launching HITECH. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  D. McInnes,et al.  General practitioners’ use of computers for prescribing and electronic health records: results from a national survey , 2006, The Medical journal of Australia.

[14]  J. Sidorov It Ain't Necessarily So: The Electronic Health Record And The Unlikely Prospect Of Reducing Health Care Costs. , 2006, Health affairs.

[15]  G. Damiani,et al.  A systematic review on the effectiveness of group versus single-handed practice. , 2013, Health policy.

[16]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  The Innovator's Prescription: A Disruptive Solution for Health Care , 2008 .

[17]  Louis M Bell,et al.  Impact of Electronic Health Record-Based Alerts on Influenza Vaccination for Children With Asthma , 2009, Pediatrics.

[18]  C. Chronaki,et al.  eHealth Trends in Europe 2005-2007: A Population-Based Survey , 2008, Journal of medical Internet research.

[19]  Matthew L Maciejewski,et al.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of a rural telemedicine collaborative care intervention for depression. , 2010, Archives of general psychiatry.

[20]  Cathy Schoen,et al.  Mirror, Mirror on the Wall, 2014 Update: How the U.S. Health Care System Compares Internationally , 2014 .

[21]  Mitsuyoshi Inow,et al.  Technology and Industry , 1949 .

[22]  R. Osborn,et al.  International Profiles of Health Care Systems: Australia, Canada, Denmark, England, France, Germany, Japan, Iceland, Italy, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United States , 2012 .

[23]  D. Blumenthal Stimulating the adoption of health information technology. , 2009, The West Virginia medical journal.

[24]  D M Fleming,et al.  Service profiles of general practitioners in Europe. European GP Task Profile Study. , 1997, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[25]  C. Schoen,et al.  A survey of primary care doctors in ten countries shows progress in use of health information technology, less in other areas. , 2012, Health affairs.

[26]  P. Groenewegen,et al.  The breadth of primary care: a systematic literature review of its core dimensions , 2010, BMC health services research.

[27]  P. Groenewegen,et al.  Measures of quality, costs and equity in primary health care instruments developed to analyse and compare primary care in 35 countries. , 2013, Quality in primary care.

[28]  Sowmya R. Rao,et al.  Electronic health records in ambulatory care--a national survey of physicians. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[29]  C. Dube,et al.  Untangling the Web--the impact of Internet use on health care and the physician-patient relationship. , 2007, Patient education and counseling.

[30]  Linda Boise,et al.  A qualitative study of rural primary care clinician views on remote monitoring technologies. , 2014, The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association.

[31]  B. Starfield,et al.  Contribution of primary care to health systems and health. , 2005, The Milbank quarterly.

[32]  P. Groenewegen,et al.  Strengthening weak primary care systems: steps towards stronger primary care in selected Western and Eastern European countries. , 2013, Health policy.

[33]  C. Lionis,et al.  Perceptions of primary care professionals on quality of services in rural Greece: a qualitative study. , 2012, Rural and remote health.

[34]  Nicolas Jequier,et al.  Appropriate technology : problems and promises , 1976 .

[35]  Terhilda Garrido,et al.  The Kaiser Permanente Electronic Health Record: transforming and streamlining modalities of care. , 2009, Health affairs.

[36]  N. Menachemi,et al.  Physicians’ Use of Email With Patients: Factors Influencing Electronic Communication and Adherence to Best Practices , 2006, Journal of medical Internet research.

[37]  S. Boren,et al.  The use and effectiveness of electronic clinical decision support tools in the ambulatory/primary care setting: a systematic review of the literature. , 2008, Informatics in primary care.

[38]  Vivek Gupta,et al.  Evaluation of computerized health management information system for primary health care in rural India , 2010, BMC health services research.

[39]  Tolib Mirzoev,et al.  Primary health care and England: the coming of age of Alma Ata? , 2007, Health policy.

[40]  Ronald Batenburg,et al.  Adoption of interorganisational ICT in primary care. , 2011 .

[41]  M. Cueto,et al.  The origins of primary health care and selective primary health care. , 2004, American journal of public health.

[42]  S. Baker,et al.  A Population-Based Survey , 2017 .

[43]  Robert Geneau,et al.  Framework for primary care organizations: the importance of a structural domain , 2007, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[44]  J. Øvretveit,et al.  Improving quality through effective implementation of information technology in healthcare. , 2007, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[45]  A. C. MacKinney,et al.  Are primary care practices ready to become patient-centered medical homes? , 2013, The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association.

[46]  D. Zipkin,et al.  Evidence-based medicine and primary care: keeping up is hard to do. , 2012, The Mount Sinai journal of medicine, New York.

[47]  K. Davis,et al.  Mirror, Mirror on the Wall Mirror, Mirror on the Wall How the Performance of the U.S. Health Care System Compares Internationally , 2010 .

[48]  Johanna I. Westbrook,et al.  Research Paper: Do Online Information Retrieval Systems Help Experienced Clinicians Answer Clinical Questions? , 2005, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[49]  Steve Chan,et al.  Mirror, Mirror on the Wall... , 1984 .

[50]  Jodi G. Daniel,et al.  A national action plan to support consumer engagement via e-health. , 2013, Health affairs.

[51]  David Blumenthal,et al.  The impact of health information technology and e-health on the future demand for physician services. , 2013, Health affairs.

[52]  José Manuel Ortega Egea,et al.  eHealth usage patterns of European general practitioners: A five-year (2002-2007) comparative study , 2010, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[53]  J. Sweeney,et al.  Customer empowerment and relationship outcomes in healthcare consultations , 2006 .

[54]  L. Green,et al.  Care Transformation , 2022 .

[55]  J. Hanley,et al.  The medical office of the 21st century (MOXXI): effectiveness of computerized decision-making support in reducing inappropriate prescribing in primary care. , 2003, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[56]  P. Groenewegen,et al.  Unity or diversity? Task profiles of general practitioners in Central and Eastern Europe , 2000 .

[57]  A. Peterson,et al.  Electronic prescribing in ambulatory practice: promises, pitfalls, and potential solutions. , 2001, The American journal of managed care.

[58]  K. Davis,et al.  Mirror, Mirror on the Wall: How the Performance of the U.S. Health Care System Compares Internationally, 2010 Update , 2010 .

[59]  M T Rabkin,et al.  Will disruptive innovations cure health care? , 2001, Harvard business review.

[60]  Y. Ville,et al.  ‘Mirror, mirror, on the wall …………’ , 2005, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[61]  Ib Johansen,et al.  Widespread adoption of information technology in primary care physician offices in Denmark: a case study. , 2010, Issue brief.