Re(de)fining the orthographic neighborhood: the role of addition and deletion neighbors in lexical decision and reading.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Manuel Perea,et al. Transposed-Letter Confusability Effects in Masked Form Priming , 2003 .
[2] Victoria A. Fromkin,et al. Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey: The mental lexicon , 1988 .
[3] Kevin B Paterson,et al. Inhibitory neighbor priming effects in eye movements during reading , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[4] B. Bergum,et al. Attention and Performance VI , 1978 .
[5] Jon Andoni Duñabeitia,et al. Transposed-letter priming effects for close versus distant transpositions. , 2008, Experimental psychology.
[6] Manuel Perea,et al. The overlap model: a model of letter position coding. , 2008, Psychological review.
[7] Erik D. Reichle,et al. Tests of the E-Z Reader model: Exploring the interface between cognition and eye-movement control , 2006, Cognitive Psychology.
[8] C. Davis,et al. More words in the neighborhood: Interference in lexical decision due to deletion neighbors , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[9] R S Berndt,et al. A new model of letter string encoding: simulating right neglect dyslexia. , 1999, Progress in brain research.
[10] A. Jacobs,et al. On localist connectionism and psychological science. , 1998 .
[11] Yasushi Hino,et al. Neighborhood Size and Neighborhood Frequency Effects in Word Recognition , 1995 .
[12] Timothy R. Jordan,et al. Presenting words without interior letters: Superiority over single letters and influence of postmask boundaries. , 1990 .
[13] Roger Ratcliff,et al. A Theory of Order Relations in Perceptual Matching , 2005 .
[14] Manuel Perea,et al. Influence of neighborhood size and exposure duration on visual-word recognition: Evidence with the yes/no and the go/no-go lexical decision tasks , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.
[15] Jeffrey S Bowers,et al. What do letter migration errors reveal about letter position coding in visual word recognition? , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[16] Max Coltheart,et al. Access to the internal lexicon , 1977 .
[17] S. M. Chambers. Letter and order information in lexical access , 1979 .
[18] S. Andrews. Lexical Retrieval and Selection Processes: Effects of Transposed-Letter Confusability , 1996 .
[19] Carol Whitney,et al. Investigations into the Neural Basis of Structured Representations , 2004 .
[20] S. Lupker,et al. Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions ☆ , 2004 .
[21] J. Bowers,et al. Automatic semantic activation of embedded words: Is there a hat in that? , 2005 .
[22] A Pollatsek,et al. On the use of counterbalanced designs in cognitive research: a suggestion for a better and more powerful analysis. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[23] S. Andrews. The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolving neighborhood conflicts , 1997 .
[24] W. Kintsch,et al. Memory and cognition , 1977 .
[25] S. Lupker,et al. Masked inhibitory priming in english: evidence for lexical inhibition. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[26] Jonathan Grainger,et al. A study of relative-position priming with superset primes. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[27] R. Henson. Short-Term Memory for Serial Order: The Start-End Model , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.
[28] C. Whitney. How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[29] M. Zorzi,et al. Two routes or one in reading aloud? A connectionist dual-process model. , 1998 .
[30] Jonathan Grainger,et al. Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception , 2004 .
[31] A. Pollatsek,et al. The effects of neighborhood frequency in reading and lexical decision. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[32] Mark S. Seidenberg,et al. Phonology, reading acquisition, and dyslexia: insights from connectionist models. , 1999, Psychological review.
[33] M Perea,et al. Repetition and form priming interact with neighborhood density at a brief stimulus onset asynchrony , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[34] Donald A. Norman,et al. Models Of Human Memory , 1970 .
[35] M. Sigman,et al. Opinion TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.9 No.7 July 2005 The neural code for written words: a proposal , 2022 .
[36] Manuel Perea,et al. Lexical competition is enhanced in the left hemisphere: Evidence from different types of orthographic neighbors , 2008, Brain and Language.
[37] James L. McClelland,et al. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. , 1981 .
[38] J. Bowers. Masked priming: State of the Art , 2003 .
[39] Jonathan Grainger,et al. Letter position information and printed word perception: the relative-position priming constraint. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[40] T. Landauer,et al. Structural differences between common and rare words: Failure of equivalence assumptions for theories of word recognition , 1973 .
[41] J. Morton. 7 – A Functional Model for Memory1 , 1970 .
[42] K. Forster,et al. Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation? , 1987 .
[43] Manuel Perea,et al. The frequency effect for pseudowords in the lexical decision task , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.
[44] Manuel Perea,et al. Please Scroll down for Article Language and Cognitive Processes beyond Alphabetic Orthographies: the Role of Form and Phonology in Transposition Effects in Katakana , 2022 .
[45] Manuel Perea,et al. Transposed-letter effects in reading: evidence from eye movements and parafoveal preview. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[46] M. Carreiras,et al. Do Transposed-Letter Similarity Effects Occur at a Prelexical Phonological Level? , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[47] Marco Zorzi,et al. Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: the CDP+ model of reading aloud. , 2007, Psychological review.
[48] S. Goldinger,et al. Priming Lexical Neighbors of Spoken Words: Effects of Competition and Inhibition. , 1989, Journal of memory and language.
[49] J. Grainger,et al. Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters , 2004 .
[50] Stephen J Lupker,et al. Is there a neighborhood frequency effect in English? Evidence from reading and lexical decision. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[51] Manuel Perea,et al. The effect of neighborhood frequency in reading: Evidence with transposed-letter neighbors , 2008, Cognition.
[52] Manuel Perea,et al. Orthographic Neighbours are not all Equal: Evidence using an Identification Technique , 1998, Language and Cognitive Processes.
[53] M. Brysbaert,et al. Neighborhood-frequency effects when primes and targets are of different lengths , 2000, Psychological research.
[54] C. Davis. N-Watch: A program for deriving neighborhood size and other psycholinguistic statistics , 2005, Behavior research methods.
[55] A. Jacobs,et al. Neighborhood frequency effects and letter visibility in visual word recognition , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.
[56] Jamie I. D. Campbell,et al. Identification, localization, and “iconic memory”: An evaluation of the bar-probe task , 1981, Memory & cognition.
[57] Paul D. Siakaluk,et al. Orthographic neighborhood effects in lexical decision: the effects of nonword orthographic neighborhood size. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[58] M Coltheart,et al. DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. , 2001, Psychological review.
[59] Carrick C. Williams,et al. Previewing the neighborhood: the role of orthographic neighbors as parafoveal previews in reading. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[60] Philip T. Smith,et al. A connectionist model of visual-word recognition that accounts for interactions between mask size and word length , 1991 .
[61] R W Schvaneveldt,et al. An activation--verification model for letter and word recognition: the word-superiority effect. , 1982, Psychological review.
[62] K I Forster,et al. No enemies in the neighborhood: absence of inhibitory neighborhood effects in lexical decision and semantic categorization. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[63] Jonathan Grainger,et al. Graded effects of number of inserted letters in superset priming. , 2008, Experimental psychology.
[64] M. Carreiras,et al. Do transposed-letter effects occur across lexeme boundaries? , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[65] W. Estes,et al. Serial position functions for letter identification at brief and extended exposure durations , 1976 .
[66] Erik D. Reichle,et al. Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. , 1998, Psychological review.
[67] Carol Whitney,et al. Comparison of the SERIOL and SOLAR theories of letter-position encoding , 2008, Brain and Language.
[68] A. Jacobs,et al. Localist connectionist approaches to human cognition , 1998 .
[69] J Grainger,et al. Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: a multiple read-out model. , 1996, Psychological review.
[70] Manuel Perea,et al. Does “whole-word shape” play a role in visual word recognition? , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.
[71] James L. McClelland,et al. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: part 1.: an account of basic findings , 1988 .
[72] Susan D. Lima,et al. Orthographic neighborhood structure and lexical access , 1996 .
[73] H. Stadthagen-González,et al. The Bristol norms for age of acquisition, imageability, and familiarity , 2006, Behavior research methods.
[74] J. Grainger,et al. Effects of orthographic neighborhood in visual word recognition: cross-task comparisons. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[75] Sarah J. White,et al. Raeding Wrods With Jubmled Lettres , 2006, Psychological science.
[76] Manuel Carreiras,et al. Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a syllable level? , 2006, Experimental psychology.
[77] Manuel Perea,et al. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology Transposed-letter Similarity Effects in Naming Pseudowords: Evidence from Children and Adults , 2022 .
[78] S Grossberg,et al. Neural dynamics of brightness perception: Features, boundaries, diffusion, and resonance , 1984, Perception & Psychophysics.
[79] R. Tegnér,et al. Word length coding in neglect dyslexia , 1993, Neuropsychologia.
[80] C. Davis,et al. BuscaPalabras: A program for deriving orthographic and phonological neighborhood statistics and other psycholinguistic indices in Spanish , 2005, Behavior research methods.
[81] Colin J. Davis,et al. The self-organising lexical acquisition and recognition (SOLAR) model of visual word recognition. , 2001 .
[82] Jonathan Grainger,et al. Cracking the orthographic code: An introduction , 2008 .
[83] A Pollatsek,et al. The effects of "neighborhood size" in reading and lexical decision. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[84] A. Jacobs,et al. On the role of competing word units in visual word recognition: The neighborhood frequency effect , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.
[85] Jeffrey S. Bowers,et al. Interfering neighbours: The impact of novel word learning on the identification of visually similar words , 2005, Cognition.