Age-related preservation of top-down attentional guidance during visual search.

Younger (19-27 years of age) and older (60-82 years of age) adults performed a letter search task in which a color singleton was either noninformative (baseline condition) or highly informative (guided condition) regarding target location. In the guided condition, both age groups exhibited a substantial decrease in response time (RT) to singleton targets, relative to the baseline condition, as well as an increase in RT to nonsingleton targets. The authors conclude that under conditions that equate the physical structure of individual displays, top-down attentional guidance can be at least as effective for older adults as for younger adults.

[1]  Adult age differences in attentional allocation during memory search. , 1992, Psychology and aging.

[2]  S. Yantis,et al.  Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  U. Neisser.  VISUAL SEARCH. , 1964, Scientific American.

[4]  David J. Madden,et al.  Selective preservation of selective attention , 1993 .

[5]  Robin J. Caster.  Handbook of the Psychology of Aging, 5th ed. , 2003 .

[6]  Jay Pratt,et al.  Attentional Capture in Younger and Older Adults , 1999 .

[7]  R. Cabeza.  Hemispheric asymmetry reduction in older adults: the HAROLD model. , 2002, Psychology and aging.

[8]  Paul T. Costa,et al.  Recent advances in psychology and aging , 2004 .

[9]  David J. Madden,et al.  Age-related changes in visual attention , 2003 .

[10]  U. Mayr,et al.  Is there an age deficit in the selection of mental sets? , 2001 .

[11]  Raymond J. Shaw,et al.  Attention and Aging: A Functional Perspective , 2000 .

[12]  T. Salthouse.  The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. , 1996, Psychological review.

[13]  M. Tinker.  Dvorine pseudo-isochromatic plates. (Rev. Ed.). , 1955 .

[14]  S. Folstein,et al.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. , 1975, Journal of psychiatric research.

[15]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Age-related changes in cortical blood flow activation during visual processing of faces and location , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[16]  James M Provenzale,et al.  Age-related changes in neural activity during visual target detection measured by fMRI. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[17]  D. E. Irwin,et al.  Age-related effects of attentional and oculomotor capture by onsets and color singletons as a function of experience. , 2003, Acta psychologica.

[18]  T. Salthouse.  What do adult age differences in the Digit Symbol Substitution Test reflect? , 1992, Journal of gerontology.

[19]  M. Turatto,et al.  Attentional capture by color without any relevant attentional set , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[20]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  A F Kramer,et al.  Age differences in visual search for feature, conjunction, and triple-conjunction targets. , 1997, Psychology and aging.

[22]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[23]  A F Kramer,et al.  Task coordination and aging: explorations of executive control processes in the task switching paradigm. , 1999, Acta psychologica.

[24]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Changing your mind: on the contributions of top-down and bottom-up guidance in visual search for feature singletons. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  ● Pytorch,et al.  Attention! , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[26]  J. Cerella,et al.  Adult information processing: Limits on loss. , 1993 .

[27]  Denise C. Park,et al.  Handbook of the Psychology of Aging , 1979 .

[28]  C. Folk,et al.  The effects of age on guided conjunction search. , 1996, Experimental aging research.

[29]  Scott A. Huettel,et al.  Age-Related Changes in NeuralActivity During Visual Perception and Attention , 2004 .

[30]  F. Craik,et al.  The handbook of aging and cognition , 1992 .

[31]  Derrick G. Watson,et al.  Aging and visual marking: selective deficits for moving stimuli. , 2002, Psychology and aging.

[32]  D. Balota,et al.  Individual differences in information-processing rate and amount: implications for group differences in response latency. , 1999, Psychological bulletin.

[33]  T. Salthouse.  Aging and measures of processing speed , 2000, Biological Psychology.

[34]  David E. Irwin,et al.  Age Differences in the Control of Looking Behavior: Do You Know Where Your Eyes Have Been? , 2000, Psychological science.

[35]  D. B. Mitchell,et al.  The handbook of aging and cognition , 2001 .

[36]  R. Cabeza.  Hemispheric asymmetry reduction in older adults: the HAROLD model. , 2002, Psychology and aging.

[37]  Lars Nyberg,et al.  Cognitive neuroscience of aging : linking cognitive and cerebral aging , 2004 .

[38]  T. Salthouse,et al.  Decomposing adult age differences in symbol arithmetic , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[39]  W. Hoyer,et al.  Age and the selectivity of visual information processing. , 1986, Psychology and aging.

[40]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Attentional control during visual search: the effect of irrelevant singletons. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[41]  D. Madden,et al.  Adult age differences in the use of distractor homogeneity during visual search. , 1996, Psychology and aging.