Single cell RNA-seq identifies the origins of heterogeneity in efficient cell transdifferentiation and reprogramming

Forced transcription factor expression can transdifferentiate somatic cells into other specialised cell types or reprogram them into induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) with variable efficiency. To better understand the heterogeneity of these processes, we used single-cell RNA sequencing to follow the transdifferentation of murine pre-B cells into macrophages as well as their reprogramming into iPSCs. Even in these highly efficient systems, there was substantial variation in the speed and path of fate conversion. We predicted and validated that these differences are inversely coupled and arise in the starting cell population, with Mychigh large pre-BII cells transdifferentiating slowly but reprogramming efficiently and Myclow small pre-BII cells transdifferentiating rapidly but failing to reprogram. Strikingly, differences in Myc activity predict the efficiency of reprogramming across a wide range of somatic cell types. These results illustrate how single cell expression and computational analyses can identify the origins of heterogeneity in cell fate conversion processes.

[1]  Jason D. Buenrostro,et al.  Deterministic Somatic Cell Reprogramming Involves Continuous Transcriptional Changes Governed by Myc and Epigenetic-Driven Modules. , 2019, Cell stem cell.

[2]  S. Heath,et al.  Transcription Factors Drive Tet2-Mediated Enhancer Demethylation to Reprogram Cell Fate , 2018, Cell stem cell.

[3]  S. Heath,et al.  Transcription Factors Drive Tet2-Mediated Enhancer Demethylation to Reprogram Cell Fate. , 2018, Cell stem cell.

[4]  Cole Trapnell,et al.  Aligning Single-Cell Developmental and Reprogramming Trajectories Identifies Molecular Determinants of Myogenic Reprogramming Outcome. , 2018, Cell systems.

[5]  Laleh Haghverdi,et al.  Batch effects in single-cell RNA-sequencing data are corrected by matching mutual nearest neighbors , 2018, Nature Biotechnology.

[6]  Katie J. Clowers,et al.  Nudt21 Controls Cell Fate by Connecting Alternative Polyadenylation to Chromatin Signaling , 2018, Cell.

[7]  A. Heguy,et al.  Nascent Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Efficiently Generate Entirely iPSC-Derived Mice while Expressing Differentiation-Associated Genes. , 2018, Cell reports.

[8]  P. Cramer,et al.  The interaction landscape between transcription factors and the nucleosome , 2017, Nature.

[9]  P. Rigollet,et al.  Reconstruction of developmental landscapes by optimal-transport analysis of single-cell gene expression sheds light on cellular reprogramming , 2017, bioRxiv.

[10]  G. Pan,et al.  Resolution of Reprogramming Transition States by Single Cell RNA-Sequencing , 2017, bioRxiv.

[11]  Erez Lieberman Aiden,et al.  Myc Regulates Chromatin Decompaction and Nuclear Architecture during B Cell Activation. , 2017, Molecular cell.

[12]  John C. Marioni,et al.  Correcting batch effects in single-cell RNA sequencing data by matching mutual nearest neighbours , 2017, bioRxiv.

[13]  Javier Quilez,et al.  Transcription factors orchestrate dynamic interplay between genome topology and gene regulation during cell reprogramming , 2017, Nature Genetics.

[14]  Eliah G. Overbey,et al.  Aligning single-cell developmental and reprogramming trajectories identifies molecular determinants of reprogramming outcome , 2017, bioRxiv.

[15]  I. Amit,et al.  Single-cell transcriptome conservation in cryopreserved cells and tissues , 2016, Genome Biology.

[16]  A. Hutchins,et al.  Models of global gene expression define major domains of cell type and tissue identity , 2017, Nucleic acids research.

[17]  J. Ernst,et al.  Cooperative Binding of Transcription Factors Orchestrates Reprogramming , 2017, Cell.

[18]  N. Neff,et al.  Dissecting direct reprogramming from fibroblast to neuron using single-cell RNA-seq , 2016, Nature.

[19]  M. Mann,et al.  C/EBPα creates elite cells for iPSC reprogramming by upregulating Klf4 and increasing the levels of Lsd1 and Brd4 , 2016, Nature Cell Biology.

[20]  Michael A. Halbisen,et al.  OSKM Induce Extraembryonic Endoderm Stem Cells in Parallel to Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells , 2016, Stem cell reports.

[21]  Fabian J Theis,et al.  Diffusion pseudotime robustly reconstructs lineage branching , 2016, Nature Methods.

[22]  W. Huber,et al.  Myc Depletion Induces a Pluripotent Dormant State Mimicking Diapause , 2016, Cell.

[23]  J. Mesirov,et al.  The Molecular Signatures Database Hallmark Gene Set Collection , 2015 .

[24]  Howard Y. Chang,et al.  The histone chaperone CAF-1 safeguards somatic cell identity , 2015, Nature.

[25]  Fabian J. Theis,et al.  Diffusion maps for high-dimensional single-cell analysis of differentiation data , 2015, Bioinform..

[26]  Denis Thieffry,et al.  C/EBPα Activates Pre-existing and De Novo Macrophage Enhancers during Induced Pre-B Cell Transdifferentiation and Myelopoiesis , 2015, Stem cell reports.

[27]  Jonathan M. Mudge,et al.  Creating reference gene annotation for the mouse C57BL6/J genome assembly , 2015, Mammalian Genome.

[28]  B. Blencowe,et al.  Myc and SAGA rewire an alternative splicing network during early somatic cell reprogramming , 2015, Genes & development.

[29]  Alessandro Vullo,et al.  Ensembl 2015 , 2014, Nucleic Acids Res..

[30]  I. Amit,et al.  Massively Parallel Single-Cell RNA-Seq for Marker-Free Decomposition of Tissues into Cell Types , 2014, Science.

[31]  Denis Thieffry,et al.  C/EBPα poises B cells for rapid reprogramming into induced pluripotent stem cells , 2013, Nature.

[32]  Howard Y. Chang,et al.  Hierarchical Mechanisms for Direct Reprogramming of Fibroblasts to Neurons , 2013, Cell.

[33]  Rudolf Jaenisch,et al.  Mechanisms and models of somatic cell reprogramming , 2013, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[34]  Jieying Zhu,et al.  H3K9 methylation is a barrier during somatic cell reprogramming into iPSCs , 2012, Nature Genetics.

[35]  Roderic Guigó,et al.  The GEM mapper: fast, accurate and versatile alignment by filtration , 2012, Nature Methods.

[36]  Charles Y. Lin,et al.  Transcriptional Amplification in Tumor Cells with Elevated c-Myc , 2012, Cell.

[37]  G. Bhagat,et al.  Early-stage epigenetic modification during somatic cell reprogramming by Parp1 and Tet2 , 2012, Nature.

[38]  Chi V Dang,et al.  MYC on the Path to Cancer , 2012, Cell.

[39]  T. Graf,et al.  Historical origins of transdifferentiation and reprogramming. , 2011, Cell stem cell.

[40]  A. Melnick,et al.  Pre-B cell receptor-mediated activation of BCL6 induces pre-B cell quiescence through transcriptional repression of MYC. , 2011, Blood.

[41]  Helga Thorvaldsdóttir,et al.  Molecular signatures database (MSigDB) 3.0 , 2011, Bioinform..

[42]  Christophe Benoist,et al.  Transcriptomes of the B and T Lineages Compared by Multiplatform Microarray Profiling , 2011, The Journal of Immunology.

[43]  J. C. Belmonte,et al.  Dedifferentiation, transdifferentiation and reprogramming: three routes to regeneration , 2011, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[44]  Thomas Vierbuchen,et al.  Direct conversion of fibroblasts to functional neurons by defined factors , 2010, Nature.

[45]  T. Enver,et al.  Forcing cells to change lineages , 2009, Nature.

[46]  Esteban Ballestar,et al.  A robust and highly efficient immune cell reprogramming system. , 2009, Cell stem cell.

[47]  K. Hochedlinger,et al.  Differentiation stage determines potential of hematopoietic cells for reprogramming into induced pluripotent stem cells , 2009, Nature Genetics.

[48]  Scott W. Lowe,et al.  Stem cells: The promises and perils of p53 , 2009, Nature.

[49]  K. Hochedlinger,et al.  Epigenetic reprogramming and induced pluripotency , 2009, Development.

[50]  A. Consiglio,et al.  Efficient and rapid generation of induced pluripotent stem cells from human keratinocytes , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[51]  Takashi Aoi,et al.  Generation of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Adult Mouse Liver and Stomach Cells , 2008, Science.

[52]  M. Araúzo-Bravo,et al.  Pluripotent stem cells induced from adult neural stem cells by reprogramming with two factors , 2008, Nature.

[53]  K. Brennand,et al.  Reprogramming of Pancreatic β Cells into Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells , 2008, Current Biology.

[54]  S. Yamanaka,et al.  Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Mouse Embryonic and Adult Fibroblast Cultures by Defined Factors , 2006, Cell.

[55]  Philip R. Gafken,et al.  Myc influences global chromatin structure , 2006, The EMBO journal.

[56]  Lothar Reichel,et al.  Augmented Implicitly Restarted Lanczos Bidiagonalization Methods , 2005, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[57]  T. Graf,et al.  Stepwise Reprogramming of B Cells into Macrophages , 2004, Cell.

[58]  H. Schöler,et al.  Oct4 distribution and level in mouse clones: consequences for pluripotency. , 2002, Genes & development.

[59]  M. Ashburner,et al.  Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology , 2000, Nature Genetics.

[60]  H. Weintraub,et al.  Expression of a single transfected cDNA converts fibroblasts to myoblasts , 1987, Cell.

[61]  K. Dorshkind,et al.  A stromal cell line from myeloid long-term bone marrow cultures can support myelopoiesis and B lymphopoiesis. , 1987, Journal of immunology.

[62]  Chunhui Hou,et al.  RNA Helicase DDX5 Inhibits Reprogramming to Pluripotency by miRNA-Based Repression of RYBP and its PRC1-Dependent and -Independent Functions. , 2017, Cell stem cell.

[63]  Rudolf Jaenisch,et al.  Single-gene transgenic mouse strains for reprogramming adult somatic cells , 2010, Nature Methods.

[64]  Thomas Seidl,et al.  Changes in gene expression profiles in developing B cells of murine bone marrow. , 2002, Genome research.

[65]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .