Tree allometry variation in response to intra- and inter-specific competitions

[1]  M. Ducey,et al.  Maximum stand density strongly depends on species-specific wood stability, shade and drought tolerance , 2018 .

[2]  C. Dormann,et al.  Tree species diversity does not compromise stem quality in major European forest types , 2018, Forest Ecology and Management.

[3]  Mário G. Pereira,et al.  Effects of crown architecture and stand structure on light absorption in mixed and monospecific Fagus sylvatica and Pinus sylvestris forests along a productivity and climate gradient through Europe , 2018 .

[4]  P. Corona,et al.  Data Platforms for Mixed Forest Research: Contributions from the EuMIXFOR Network , 2018 .

[5]  H. Pretzsch,et al.  Dynamics, Silviculture and Management of Mixed Forests , 2018, Managing Forest Ecosystems.

[6]  M. Dassot,et al.  Terrestrial laser scanning reveals differences in crown structure of Fagus sylvatica in mixed vs. pure European forests , 2017 .

[7]  Hans Pretzsch,et al.  Generalized biomass and leaf area allometric equations for European tree species incorporating stand structure, tree age and climate , 2017 .

[8]  J. Bauhus,et al.  Diversity and competition influence tree allometric relationships – developing functions for mixed‐species forests , 2017 .

[9]  Christian Messier,et al.  Spatial complementarity in tree crowns explains overyielding in species mixtures , 2017, Nature Ecology &Evolution.

[10]  M. Ducey,et al.  Climate and species functional traits influence maximum live tree stocking in the Lake States, USA , 2017 .

[11]  H. Pretzsch.  Individual Tree Structure and Growth in Mixed Compared with Monospecific Stands , 2017 .

[12]  H. Pretzsch,et al.  Stand dynamics of mixed-species stands compared with monocultures , 2017 .

[13]  D. Forrester.  Ecological and physiological processes in mixed versus monospecific stands , 2017 .

[14]  R. Fournier,et al.  Response of sugar maple (Acer saccharum, Marsh.) tree crown structure to competition in pure versus mixed stands , 2016 .

[15]  T. Zlatanov,et al.  Mixing of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) enhances structural heterogeneity, and the effect increases with water availability , 2016 .

[16]  Hans Pretzsch,et al.  Wood quality in complex forests versus even-aged monocultures: review and perspectives , 2016, Wood Science and Technology.

[17]  H. Pretzsch,et al.  Tamm Review: On the strength of evidence when comparing ecosystem functions of mixtures with monocultures , 2015 .

[18]  Hans Pretzsch,et al.  Representation of species mixing in forest growth models. A review and perspective , 2015 .

[19]  S. Condés,et al.  Climate modifies tree interactions in terms of basal area growth and mortality in monospecific and mixed Fagus sylvatica and Pinus sylvestris forests , 2015, European Journal of Forest Research.

[20]  Olivier Bouriaud,et al.  Crown plasticity enables trees to optimize canopy packing in mixed-species forests , 2015 .

[21]  Hendrik Poorter,et al.  How does biomass distribution change with size and differ among species? An analysis for 1200 plant species from five continents , 2015, The New phytologist.

[22]  Hans Pretzsch,et al.  Characterization of the structure, dynamics, and productivity of mixed-species stands: review and perspectives , 2015, European Journal of Forest Research.

[23]  H. Pretzsch,et al.  Mixed stands of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst) can be more productive than monocultures. Evidence from over 100 years of observation of long-term experiments , 2014 .

[24]  Hans Pretzsch,et al.  Canopy space filling and tree crown morphology in mixed-species stands compared with monocultures , 2014 .

[25]  R. Schneider,et al.  Influence of shade tolerance and development stage on the allometry of ten temperate tree species , 2014, Oecologia.

[26]  H. Pretzsch,et al.  Analyzing size-symmetric vs. size-asymmetric and intra- vs. inter-specific competition in beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) mixed stands , 2014 .

[27]  M. Río,et al.  New approaches to modelling cross-sectional area to height allometry in four Mediterranean pine species , 2014 .

[28]  D. Forrester.  The spatial and temporal dynamics of species interactions in mixed-species forests: From pattern to process , 2014 .

[29]  H. Pretzsch,et al.  Species-Specific and Ontogeny-Related Stem Allometry of European Forest Trees: Evidence from Extensive Stem Analyses , 2013 .

[30]  R. LarocqueGuy,et al.  Competition theory — science and application in mixed forest stands: review of experimental and modelling methods and suggestions for future research , 2013 .

[31]  H. Pretzsch,et al.  Morphological plasticity of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) in pure and mixed-species stands , 2013 .

[32]  Hans Pretzsch,et al.  Structural crown properties of Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) and European beech (Fagus sylvatica [L.]) in mixed versus pure stands revealed by terrestrial laser scanning , 2013, Trees.

[33]  D. Coomes,et al.  Predictable changes in aboveground allometry of trees along gradients of temperature, aridity and competition , 2012 .

[34]  Mark J. Ducey,et al.  Evergreenness and wood density predict height–diameter scaling in trees of the northeastern United States , 2012 .

[35]  M. Noordwijk,et al.  Tree shape plasticity in relation to crown exposure , 2012, Trees.

[36]  H. Pretzsch,et al.  Evidence of variant intra- and interspecific scaling of tree crown structure and relevance for allometric theory , 2012, Oecologia.

[37]  E. Cano,et al.  Mapa de series, geoseries y geopermaseries de vegetación de España (Memoria del mapa de vegetación potencial de España). Parte II , 2011 .

[38]  Mark J. Ducey,et al.  A stand density index for complex mixed species forests in the northeastern United States , 2010 .

[39]  A. Mäkelä,et al.  Self-shading affects allometric scaling in trees , 2010 .

[40]  Rasmus Astrup,et al.  Competition and tree crowns: a neighborhood analysis of three boreal tree species. , 2010 .

[41]  H. Pretzsch,et al.  Size-symmetric versus size-asymmetric competition and growth partitioning among trees in forest stands along an ecological gradient in central Europe , 2010 .

[42]  Aged Forests.  PERFECTING A STAND-DENSITY INDEX FOR EVEN- , 2010 .

[43]  James S. Clark,et al.  Capturing diversity and interspecific variability in allometries: A hierarchical approach , 2008 .

[44]  Karl J. Niklas,et al.  Biological scaling: Does the exception prove the rule? , 2007, Nature.

[45]  A. Mäkelä,et al.  Crown ratio influences allometric scaling in trees. , 2006, Ecology.

[46]  Fernando Valladares,et al.  Quantitative estimation of phenotypic plasticity: bridging the gap between the evolutionary concept and its ecological applications , 2006 .

[47]  Ü. Niinemets,et al.  Tolerance to shade, drought, and waterlogging of temperate northern hemisphere trees and shrubs , 2006 .

[48]  B. Gardiner,et al.  The effect of wind exposure on the tree aerial architecture and biomechanics of Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis, Pinaceae). , 2006, American journal of botany.

[49]  H. Peltola,et al.  Modelling the distribution of diameter growth along the stem in Scots pine , 2006, Trees.

[50]  C. Woodall,et al.  Determining maximum stand density index in mixed species stands for strategic-scale stocking assessments , 2005 .

[51]  G. Hemery,et al.  Applications of the crown diameter–stem diameter relationship for different species of broadleaved trees , 2005 .

[52]  H. Pretzsch,et al.  A Re-Evaluation of Reineke's Rule and Stand Density Index , 2005, Forest Science.

[53]  K. Niklas.  Plant allometry: is there a grand unifying theory? , 2004, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[54]  Karl J Niklas,et al.  Global Allocation Rules for Patterns of Biomass Partitioning in Seed Plants , 2002, Science.

[55]  F. Bravo,et al.  Analysis of diameter-density relationships and self-thinning in non-thinned even-aged Scots pine stands , 2001 .

[56]  Robert B. Ferguson,et al.  The effects of spacing and thinning on stand and tree characteristics of 38-year-old loblolly pine , 2000 .

[57]  K. Karlsson.  Stem Form and Taper Changes After Thinning and Nitrogen Fertilization in Picea abies and Pinus sylvestris Stands , 2000 .

[58]  A. Cameron,et al.  Effect of nursing mixtures on stem form, crown size, branching habit and wood properties of Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr.) , 1999 .

[59]  James H. Brown,et al.  A general model for the structure and allometry of plant vascular systems , 1999, Nature.

[60]  S. Titus,et al.  Relationships between tree slenderness coefficients and tree or stand characteristics for major species in boreal mixedwood forests , 1998 .

[61]  Petteri Vanninen,et al.  Impacts of size and competition on tree form and distribution of aboveground biomass in Scots pine , 1998 .

[62]  H. Burkhart,et al.  Modeling thinning effects on ring width distribution in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) , 1997 .

[63]  V. Baldwin,et al.  The relationship between Reineke's stand-density index and physical stem mechanics , 1996 .

[64]  William R. Wykoff,et al.  A Basal Area Increment Model for Individual Conifers in the Northern Rocky Mountains , 1990, Forest Science.

[65]  P H Steele,et al.  Factors Determining Lumber Recovery in Sawmilling. , 1984 .

[66]  J. Beauchamp,et al.  Corrections for Bias in Regression Estimates After Logarithmic Transformation , 1973 .

[67]  P. Larson.  Stem Form Development of Forest Trees , 1963 .