Resource Dependence Dynamics: Partner Reactions to Mergers

Research on resource dependence typically takes a static view in which actions and outcomes are determined structurally, but not as responses to the actions of the counterparty in an exchange relation. By contrast, this study addresses a question of power dynamics by examining whether mergers of organizations trigger responses from their common exchange partners. We predict that common exchange partners respond by withdrawing from the relationship and that their responses vary with the availability of alternatives, the value of the relationship, and the relationship history. Using data on advertising agencies, we show that mergers of agencies do trigger reactions from their common clients, and the reactions differ with agency and client characteristics. Extending existing theory and evidence, our results suggest that firms respond to the dynamics of exchange relationships and not only to their structure.

[1]  Martin Gargiulo.  Two-step leverage: Managing constraint in organizational politics , 1993 .

[2]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Role of Individual Attachments in the Dissolution of Interorganizational Relationships , 1992 .

[3]  W. Baker.  Market Networks and Corporate Behavior , 1990, American Journal of Sociology.

[4]  James B. Wade,et al.  The Impact of CEO Status Diffusion on the Economic Outcomes of Other Senior Managers , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[5]  Joel Podolny.  Networks as the Pipes and Prisms of the Market1 , 2001, American Journal of Sociology.

[6]  Ronald S. Burt,et al.  Autonomy in a Social Topology , 1980, American Journal of Sociology.

[7]  Jan B. Heide,et al.  The Role of Dependence Balancing in Safeguarding Transaction-Specific Assets in Conventional Channels , 1988 .

[8]  Michael W. Macy,et al.  Collective action and power inequality : Coalitions in exchange networks , 2001 .

[9]  Tiziana Casciaro,et al.  When More Power Makes Actors Worse Off: Turning a Profit in the American Economy , 2006 .

[10]  Joel Podolny,et al.  Status, Quality, and Social Order in the California Wine Industry , 1999 .

[11]  Michelle Rogan.  Executive Departures Without Client Losses: The Role of Multiplex Ties in Exchange Partner Retention , 2014 .

[12]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Duynamics of Interorganizational Attachments: Auditor-Client Relationships , 1988 .

[13]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  Merger as a response to organizational interdependence , 1972 .

[14]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness , 1997 .

[15]  Michael Lounsbury,et al.  Institutional Sources of Practice Variation: Staffing College and University Recycling Programs , 2001 .

[16]  Douglas L. Miller,et al.  Robust Inference With Multiway Clustering , 2011 .

[17]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  Joint Ventures and Interorganizational Interdependence , 1976 .

[18]  H. Rao,et al.  Fool's Gold: Social Proof in the Initiation and Abandonment of Coverage by Wall Street Analysts , 2001 .

[19]  Ezra W. Zuckerman,et al.  The Categorical Imperative: Securities Analysts and the Illegitimacy Discount , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[20]  R. Gulati.  Does Familiarity Breed Trust? The Implications of Repeated Ties for Contractual Choice in Alliances , 1995 .

[21]  Lisa A. Keister,et al.  WHERE DO STRONG TIES COME FROM? A DYAD ANALYSIS OF THE STRENGTH OF INTERFIRM EXCHANGE RELATIONS DURING CHINA'S ECONOMIC TRANSITION , 1999 .

[22]  Marc Galanter,et al.  Tournament of Lawyers: The Transformation of the Big Law Firm , 1991 .

[23]  Keith G. Provan,et al.  Environmental Linkages and Power in Resource-Dependence Relations between Organizations. , 1980 .

[24]  Henrich R. Greve,et al.  Built to Last but Falling Apart: Cohesion, Friction, and Withdrawal from Interfirm Alliances , 2010 .

[25]  M. Macy,et al.  Power, Identity, and Collective Action in Social Exchange , 2004 .

[26]  Henrich R. Greve,et al.  The Prince and the Pauper: Search and Brokerage in the Initiation of Status-Heterophilous Ties , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[27]  Robin Cowan,et al.  Network-Independent Partner Selection and the Evolution of Innovation Networks , 2009, Manag. Sci..

[28]  J. Broschak,et al.  Managers' Mobility and Market Interface: The Effect of Managers' Career Mobility on the Dissolution of Market Ties , 2004 .

[29]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Swimming with Sharks: Technology Ventures, Defense Mechanisms and Corporate Relationships , 2008 .

[30]  Elizabeth G. Pontikes,et al.  Stained Red , 2010 .

[31]  Andrea L. Larson.  Network Dyads in Entrepreneurial Settings: A Study of the Governance of Exchange Relationships , 1992 .

[32]  R. Emerson.  Power-Dependence Relations , 1962, Power in Modern Societies.

[33]  Andrew von Nordenflycht.  Firm Size and Industry Structure Under Human Capital Intensity: Insights from the Evolution of the Global Advertising Industry , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[34]  Gokhan Ertug,et al.  What’s in it for them? Advantages of Higher Status Partners in Exchange Relationships , 2010 .

[35]  Sydney Finkelstein,et al.  Interindustry merger patterns and resource dependence: A replication and extension of Pfeffer (1972) , 1997 .

[36]  S. Haugland,et al.  Predicting and measuring alliance performance: a multidimensional analysis , 2008 .

[37]  K. Cook,et al.  Managed care and the US health care system a social exchange perspective. , 2002, Social science & medicine.

[38]  Joel Podolny.  A Status-Based Model of Market Competition , 1993, American Journal of Sociology.

[39]  Mukti Khaire,et al.  Young and No Money? Never Mind: The Material Impact of Social Resources on New Venture Growth , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[40]  E. Lazega.  Rule Enforcement among Peers: A Lateral Control Regime , 2000 .

[41]  R. Gulati,et al.  Where Do Interorganizational Networks Come From?1 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[42]  Andrew von Nordenflycht.  Is Public Ownership Bad for Professional Service Firms? Ad Agency Ownership, Performance, and Creativity , 2007 .

[43]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  Taking Stock of Networks and Organizations: A Multilevel Perspective , 2004 .

[44]  K. Cook.  Exchange and Power in Networks of Interorganizational Relations , 1976 .

[45]  J. Pfeffer.  Size and Composition of Corporate Boards of Directors: The Organization and its Environment , 1972 .

[46]  Edward J. Zajac,et al.  Interlocking Directorates as An Interorganizational Strategy: A Test of Critical Assumptions , 1988 .

[47]  Ernest R. Cadotte,et al.  Exchange Interdependence and Interfirm Interaction: Research in a Simulated Channel Setting , 1994 .

[48]  Jonghoon Bae,et al.  Partner substitutability, alliance network structure and firm profitability in the telecommunications industry , 2004 .

[49]  W. Mitchell,et al.  Structural homophily or social asymmetry? The formation of alliances by poorly embedded firms , 2009 .

[50]  Robert R. Faulkner,et al.  Hazards of the Market: The Continuity and Dissolution of Interorganizational Market Relationships , 1998 .

[51]  W. Boeker,et al.  Organizational performance and adaptation: effects of environment and performance on changes in board composition. , 1991, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[52]  Brayden G. King,et al.  A Political Mediation Model of Corporate Response to Social Movement Activism , 2008 .

[53]  Lung-fei Lee.  Generalized Econometric Models with Selectivity , 1983 .

[54]  Toby E. Stuart.  Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: A study of growth and innovation rates i , 2000 .

[55]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  The External Control of Organizations. , 1978 .

[56]  Henrich R. Greve,et al.  A Matching Theory of Alliance Formation and Organizational Success: Complementarity and Compatibility , 2009 .

[57]  Michelle Rogan,et al.  Too Close for Comfort? The Effect of Embeddedness and Competitive Overlap on Client Relationship Retention Following an Acquisition , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[58]  M. Mizruchi.  Similarity of Political Behavior Among Large American Corporations , 1989, American Journal of Sociology.

[59]  Mark S. Mizruchi,et al.  Bankers on the board and the debt ratio of firms , 2005 .

[60]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Time to Break Up: Social and Instrumental Antecedents of Firm Exits from Exchange Cliques , 2005 .

[61]  J. Heckman.  Sample selection bias as a specification error , 1979 .

[62]  Atul Nerkar,et al.  Acquisition Integration and Productivity Losses in the Technical Core: Disruption of Inventors in Acquired Companies , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[63]  P. Rosenzweig.  Managing Acquisitions: Creating Value Through Corporate Renewal , 1991 .

[64]  Tiziana Casciaro,et al.  Power Imbalance, Mutual Dependence, and Constraint Absorption: A Closer Look at Resource Dependence Theory , 2005 .