Optimal Foraging and the Form of the Predator Isocline

I explore the relation between optimal foraging and the geometrical character of the predator isocline. Two basic models are discussed. The first is a multispecies generalization of Holling's "disc" equation. If a predator can rapidly discriminate among prey types, it is argued that its isoclines should not have positive slopes. Isoclines with positive slopes may occur if the predator must invest time discriminating between prey of unequal value, and there is a high absolute abundance of the better quality prey species. For a food-limited predator, however, selection should moderate the degree of rightward slope. In the second model, encounter and capture rates vary directly with relative prey abundance because of switching behavior. A number of published switching models are shown to produce isoclines with partially positive slopes. If the attack rates on each of two prey species are functionally related, it is argued that an optimally foraging predator will either have rectangular isoclines or isoclines with negative slope. This suggests that existing switching models are not completely satisfactory representations of switching behavior. A few examples of predators with isoclines of positive slope have been observed. Some possible mechanisms for generating such isoclines are discussed briefly. Several central ideas in community theory would founder were predators often to have isoclines with positive slopes.

[1]  John W. Glasser The Role of Predation in Shaping and Maintaining the Structure of Communities , 1979, The American Naturalist.

[2]  D. Rapport Optimal Foraging for Complementary Resources , 1980, The American Naturalist.

[3]  W. Murdoch Stabilizing effects of spatial heterogeneity in predator-prey systems. , 1977, Theoretical population biology.

[4]  C. S. Holling,et al.  The functional response of predators to prey density and its role in mimicry and population regulation. , 1965 .

[5]  D. Pimentel,et al.  SWITCHING IN THE PARASITOID NASONIA VITRIPENNIS AND ITS EFFECTS ON HOST COMPETITION , 1978 .

[6]  M. Hassell,et al.  The dynamics of arthropod predator-prey systems. , 1979, Monographs in population biology.

[7]  S. Levin,et al.  A Mathematical Model of Coevolving Populations , 1977, The American Naturalist.

[8]  William W. Murdoch,et al.  Switching, Functional Response, and Stability in Predator-Prey Systems , 1975, The American Naturalist.

[9]  W. Murdoch,et al.  Predation by Coccinellid beetles : experiments on switching , 1973 .

[10]  M. Gilpin Group selection in predator-prey communities. , 1975, Monographs in population biology.

[11]  Montgomery Slatkin,et al.  Models of Coevolution , 1979, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[12]  Marian Stamp Dawkins,et al.  Perceptual changes in chicks: Another look at the ‘search image’ concept , 1971 .

[13]  N. Ringler Selective Predation by Drift-Feeding Brown Trout (Salmo trutta) , 1979 .

[14]  M. Cock THE ASSESSMENT OF PREFERENCE , 1978 .

[15]  Graham H. Pyke,et al.  Optimal Foraging: A Selective Review of Theory and Tests , 1977, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[16]  Mark H Gromko,et al.  WHAT IS FREQUENCY‐DEPENDENT SELECTION? , 1977, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[17]  Timothy G. Fullick Frequency Dependent Food Selection in Relation to Two Models , 1979, The American Naturalist.

[18]  P. R. Atsatt,et al.  Plant Defense Guilds , 1976, Science.

[19]  E. Charnov,et al.  Ecological Implications of Resource Depression , 1976, The American Naturalist.

[20]  Miguel A. Santos PREY SELECTIVITY AND SWITCHING RESPONSE OF ZETZELLIA MALI , 1976 .

[21]  R. Vance,et al.  Predation and Resource Partitioning in One Predator -- Two Prey Model Communities , 1978, The American Naturalist.

[22]  J. T. Erichsen,et al.  Optimal prey selection in the great tit (Parus major) , 1977, Animal Behaviour.

[23]  David Tilman,et al.  Resources: A Graphical-Mechanistic Approach to Competition and Predation , 1980, The American Naturalist.

[24]  J. Lawton,et al.  Switching in invertebrate predators , 1974 .

[25]  J. McNair A stochastic foraging model with predator training effects: I. Functional response, switching, and run lengths. , 1980, Theoretical population biology.

[26]  L. Nunney Density compensation, isocline shape and single-level competition models. , 1980, Journal of theoretical biology.

[27]  W. Murdoch,et al.  Predation and Population Stability , 1975 .

[28]  M. Rosenzweig,et al.  A Theory of Habitat Selection , 1981 .

[29]  R. Hughes Optimal Diets under the Energy Maximization Premise: The Effects of Recognition Time and Learning , 1979, The American Naturalist.

[30]  P. F. Major,et al.  Predator-prey interactions in two schooling fishes, Caranx ignobilis and Stolephorus purpureus , 1978, Animal Behaviour.

[31]  M. Rausher Search Image for Leaf Shape in a Butterfly , 1978, Science.

[32]  M. Hassell The dynamics of arthropod predator-prey systems. , 1979, Monographs in population biology.

[33]  J. McNair A stochastic foraging model with predator training effects. II. Optimal diets , 1981 .

[34]  Marcus W. Feldman,et al.  Species Packing and Predation Pressure , 1975 .

[35]  D. J. Hall,et al.  Optimal Foraging and the Size Selection of Prey by the Bluegill Sunfish (Lepomis Macrochirus) , 1974 .

[36]  A. Oaten,et al.  Optimal foraging in patches: a case for stochasticity. , 1977, Theoretical population biology.

[37]  R. May,et al.  Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems , 1976, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[38]  M Tansky,et al.  Switching effect in prey--predator system. , 1978, Journal of theoretical biology.

[39]  Peter Chesson,et al.  Predator-Prey Theory and Variability , 1978 .

[40]  D. A. Chant,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF PREY DENSITY, RELATIVE HUMIDITY, AND STARVATION ON THE PREDACIOUS BEHAVIOR OF PHYTOSEIULUS PERSIMILIS ATHIAS-HENRIOT (ACARINA: PHYTOSEIIDAE) , 1966 .

[41]  J. Krebs,et al.  Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach , 1978 .

[42]  C. S. Holling,et al.  Principles of Insect Predation , 1961 .

[43]  T. Schoener Theory of Feeding Strategies , 1971 .

[44]  Manfred Milinski,et al.  Optimal foraging of sticklebacks on swarming prey , 1979, Animal Behaviour.

[45]  M. Rosenzweig EVOLUTION OF THE PREDATOR ISOCLINE , 1973, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[46]  W M Schaffer,et al.  Homage to the red queen. I. Coevolution of predators and their victims. , 1978, Theoretical population biology.

[47]  H. Pulliam,et al.  The Principle of Optimal Behavior and the Theory of Communities , 1976 .

[48]  A. Sih Optimal Patch Use: Variation in Selective Pressure for Efficient Foraging , 1982, The American Naturalist.

[49]  R. May,et al.  Nonlinear Aspects of Competition Between Three Species , 1975 .

[50]  G. O. Batzli,et al.  The Population Ecology of Cycles in Small Mammals: Mathematical Theory and Biological Fact , 1982 .

[51]  P. Abrams Functional Responses of Optimal Foragers , 1982, The American Naturalist.

[52]  R. Hughes,et al.  ENERGY MAXIMIZATION IN THE DIET OF THE SHORE CRAB, CARCINUS MAENAS , 1978 .

[53]  J. Downing In Situ Foraging Responses of Three Species of Littoral Cladocerans , 1981 .

[54]  J. Steele The Structure of Marine Ecosystems , 1974 .

[55]  Michael E. Gilpin,et al.  Spiral Chaos in a Predator-Prey Model , 1979, The American Naturalist.

[56]  William W. Murdoch,et al.  Switching in Predatory Fish , 1975 .

[57]  M. Hassell,et al.  Predation in multi-prey communities. , 1976, Journal of theoretical biology.

[58]  W. Murdoch Switching in General Predators: Experiments on Predator Specificity and Stability of Prey Populations , 1969 .

[59]  S. Jørgensen Models in Ecology , 1975 .

[60]  T. Schoener The compression hypothesis and temporal resource partitioning. , 1974, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[61]  H. Cornell Search Strategies and the Adaptive Significance of Switching in Some General Predators , 1976, The American Naturalist.

[62]  John W. Glasser Erratum: The Role of Predation in Shaping and Maintaining the Structure of Communities , 1979, The American Naturalist.

[63]  J. Greenwood,et al.  Analysing Experiments on Frequency-Dependent Selection by Predators , 1979 .

[64]  C. Jeffries Qualitative Stability and Digraphs in Model Ecosystems , 1974 .

[65]  E. J. Maly Interactions among the Predatory Rotifer Asplanchna and Two Prey, Paramecium and Euglena , 1975 .

[66]  J. M. Smith,et al.  The Coevolution and Stability of Competing Species , 1976, The American Naturalist.

[67]  E. Charnov Optimal Foraging: Attack Strategy of a Mantid , 1976, The American Naturalist.

[68]  R. Taylor Ambush Predation as a Destabilizing Influence Upon Prey Populations , 1981, The American Naturalist.

[69]  R. Holt Predation, apparent competition, and the structure of prey communities. , 1977, Theoretical population biology.

[70]  N. Shigesada,et al.  Switching effect of predation on competitive prey species. , 1979, Journal of theoretical biology.

[71]  J. Diamond,et al.  Ecology and Evolution of Communities , 1976, Nature.

[72]  Paul H. Harvey,et al.  The Analysis of Biological Populations , 1972 .

[73]  Dan M. JOHNSONt,et al.  SWITCHING AND SIGMOID FUNCTIONAL RESPONSE CURVES BY DAMSELFLY NAIADS WITH ALTERNATIVE PREY AVAILABLE , 1979 .

[74]  The Analysis of Biological Populations , 1973 .

[75]  R. May Predators that switch , 1977, Nature.