A Mobile Platform's In‐App Advertising Contract Under Agency Pricing for App Sales

Unlike advertising in traditional media, a mobile platform's in-app advertising market exhibits two unique features – split structure of the mobile platform with a platform owner and an app developer jointly provisioning in-app advertising, and agency pricing for app sales. We develop a two-sided market model to analyze the role of these two unique features in determining the platform owner's optimal advertising revenue-sharing contract. Our results reveal an interesting N-shaped dynamic regarding the platform owner's optimal choice of her ad revenue share with respect to the overall advertisers’ valuation of in-app ads. We identify a between-agent subsidization strategy for the platform owner, where she finds it optimal to subsidize the developer via the advertising channel, leading to greater profits for both of them. We find that the advertising revenue-sharing contract under agency pricing for app sales leads to a higher app price than would be offered by the integrated platform found in traditional advertising. However, the ad price is coordinated under the platform owner's optimal choice of ad revenue share when she obtains revenue from both the advertising and app sales channels, leading to an alignment of her interest with the app developer's on ad level. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

[1]  Ramon Casadesus-Masanell,et al.  Strategies to Fight Ad-Sponsored Rivals , 2010 .

[2]  Vineet Kumar,et al.  Designing Freemium: A Model of Consumer Usage, Upgrade, and Referral Dynamics , 2013 .

[3]  Monic Sun,et al.  Ad Revenue and Content Commercialization: Evidence from Blogs , 2011 .

[4]  Ming Fan,et al.  An Analysis of Pricing Models in the Electronic Book Market , 2014, MIS Q..

[5]  Jan Stallaert,et al.  An Economic Analysis of Online Advertising Using Behavioral Targeting , 2010, MIS Q..

[6]  Vijay S. Mookerjee,et al.  Advertising Strategies in Electronic Retailing: A Differential Games Approach , 2011, Inf. Syst. Res..

[7]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  Vertical Differentiation and a Comparison of Online Advertising Models , 2010, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[8]  Varghese S. Jacob,et al.  Pricing Models for Online Advertising: CPM vs. CPC , 2012, Inf. Syst. Res..

[9]  Yong Tan,et al.  Allocating Spending Between Advertising and Information Technology in Electronic Retailing , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[10]  Simon P. Anderson,et al.  Market Provision of Broadcasting: A Welfare Analysis ∗ , 2003 .

[11]  Yipeng Liu,et al.  Optimal Software Free Trial Strategy: Limited Version, Time-locked, or Hybrid? , 2015 .

[12]  Zhulei Tang,et al.  Incentive Problems in Performance-Based Online Advertising Pricing: Cost per Click vs. Cost per Action , 2016, Manag. Sci..

[13]  Siva Viswanathan,et al.  Information Asymmetry and Hybrid Advertising , 2013 .

[14]  Miklos Sarvary,et al.  Content vs. Advertising: The Impact of Competition on Media Firm Strategy , 2009, Mark. Sci..

[15]  Bruno Jullien,et al.  Two-Sided Markets and Electronic Intermediaries , 2004, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[16]  B. Gu,et al.  Price Dispersion and Loss Leader Pricing: Evidence from the Online Book Industry , 2012 .

[17]  Suresh P. Sethi,et al.  Dynamic Pricing and Advertising for Web Content Providers , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[18]  D. J. Wu,et al.  Economics of Free Under Perpetual Licensing: Implications for the Software Industry , 2014, Inf. Syst. Res..

[19]  Hsing Kenneth Cheng,et al.  Optimal Software Free Trial Strategy: The Impact of Network Externalities and Consumer Uncertainty , 2012, Inf. Syst. Res..

[20]  J. Rochet,et al.  Two-sided markets: a progress report , 2006 .

[21]  R. Casadesus-Masanell,et al.  Business Model Innovation and Competitive Imitation: The Case of Sponsor-Based Business Models , 2013 .

[22]  Gérard P. Cachon,et al.  Supply Chain Coordination with Revenue-Sharing Contracts: Strengths and Limitations , 2005, Manag. Sci..