Intraindividual In Vivo Comparison of Gadolinium Contrast Agents for Pharmacokinetic Analysis Using Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Purpose:To compare the intraindividual differences of dynamic signal characteristics for 3 gadolinium chelates (gadopentetate dimeglumine [Gd-DTPA], gadodiamide [Gd-DTPA-BMA], and gadobenate dimeglumine [Gd-BOPTA]) using dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (DCE-MRI) with a preclinical beagle model at 7 Tesla. Method and Materials:Seven beagles were scanned 3 times each with a 7-day interval between the scans on a 7T whole body MRI system (Achieva, Philips) using a T/R head coil. Three different Gd contrast agents including Gd-DTPA, Gd-DTPABMA, and Gd-BOPTA were injected in a randomized order with a power injector (Spectris, MedRad, Indianola, PA) using dose of 0.1 mmol/kg body weight and flow rate of 0.06 mL/s. During image acquisition and data analysis, the identity of the specific contrast agent used for each examination was blinded. A 3D RF-spoiled fast field echo sequence was used for dynamic scans with in-plane spatial resolution 0.47 × 0.47 mm2, temporal resolution of 9.5 seconds, and a total of 60 time points. Regions of interest were drawn within the carotid arteries and muscle tissue to determine semiquantitative parameters including maximum enhancement ratio, area under the signal enhancement curve over 90 seconds after contrast injection (AUC_90), time to maximum signal enhancement (Tmax), and washout_score. Additionally, quantitative pharmacokinetic parameters were measured in muscle tissues by applying 3 separate 2-compartment models; (1) artery input function (AIF) based Tofts model, (2) Brix model without AIF, and (3) AIF decomposed refined Brix model. Results:Gd-BOPTA produced higher signal to noise ratio on postcontrast T1- weighted images than the other 2 Gd based contrast agents at 7T. Quantitatively, Gd-BOPTA provided a significantly higher maximum enhancement ratio (P < 0.01), AUC_90 (P < 0.01) and washout_score (P < 0.01) in beagle musculature and cranial vasculature compared with both Gd-DTPA and Gd-DTPA-BMA. Among all the quantitative pharmacokinetic parameters, only the exchange rate constants (kep) calculated from these 3 models did not show a significant difference among the various contrast agents. Conclusions:Gd chelate containing MR contrast agents can be used at 7T for DCEMRI. Gd-BOPTA demonstrates stronger signal enhancement than standard Gd chelates, in concordance with the results of studies at lower fields. The observed enhancement characteristics for the 3 contrast agents demonstrate that the pharmacokinetic parameter kep is more robust in various models using DCE-MRI than the other pharmacokinetic parameters. This information is important relative to multisite clinical trials and long-term clinical studies that often use several different contrast agents and different models.

[1]  Viktor Novikov,et al.  Tumor microvascular changes in antiangiogenic treatment: Assessment by magnetic resonance contrast media of different molecular weights , 2004, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[2]  V. Lorusso,et al.  Safety, tolerance, biodistribution, and MR imaging enhancement of the liver with gadobenate dimeglumine: results of clinical pharmacologic and pilot imaging studies in nonpatient and patient volunteers. , 1999, Academic radiology.

[3]  S. Heywang,et al.  MR imaging of the breast using gadolinium-DTPA. , 1986, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[4]  M Rovaris,et al.  A comparison of the sensitivity of MRI after double- and triple-dose Gd-DTPA for detecting enhancing lesions in multiple sclerosis. , 2000, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[5]  Michael V Knopp,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging in oncology for diagnosis and therapy monitoring. , 2003, Molecular cancer therapeutics.

[6]  T. Nakada Clinical application of high and ultra high-field MRI , 2007, Brain and Development.

[7]  P. Taroni,et al.  Multihance clinical pharmacology: biodistribution and MR enhancement of the liver. , 1998, Academic radiology.

[8]  Jian Z. Wang,et al.  Predicting Control of Primary Tumor and Survival by DCE MRI During Early Therapy in Cervical Cancer , 2009, Investigative radiology.

[9]  R. Henkelman Measurement of signal intensities in the presence of noise in MR images. , 1985, Medical physics.

[10]  Wolfgang Ebert,et al.  Tissue-specific MR contrast agents. , 2003, European journal of radiology.

[11]  L. Balant,et al.  Gd-BOPTA Transport Into Rat Hepatocytes: Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Images Using a Hollow-Fiber Bioreactor , 2004, Investigative radiology.

[12]  E M Haacke,et al.  Fast MR imaging: techniques and clinical applications. , 1990, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  B. Wintersperger,et al.  The Efficacy of Gadobenate Dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA) at 3 Tesla in Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Comparison to 1.5 Tesla and a Standard Gadolinium Chelate Using a Rat Brain Tumor Model , 2006, Investigative radiology.

[14]  Marie-France Bellin,et al.  MR contrast agents, the old and the new. , 2006, European journal of radiology.

[15]  M. Bock,et al.  Assessment of Gadobenate Dimeglumine for Magnetic Resonance Angiography: Phase I Studies , 2002, Investigative radiology.

[16]  W J Manning,et al.  Studies of Gd‐DTPA relaxivity and proton exchange rates in tissue , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[17]  J. Gore,et al.  Quantitative pharmacokinetic analysis of DCE-MRI data without an arterial input function: a reference region model. , 2005, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[18]  J. O'fallon,et al.  Triple-dose Contrast/magnetization Transfer Suppressed Imaging of ‘non-enhancing’ Brain Gliomas , 2002, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[19]  V M Runge,et al.  Contrast media research. , 1999, Investigative radiology.

[20]  Shao-Pow Lin,et al.  MR contrast agents: Physical and pharmacologic basics , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[21]  M. Bellin,et al.  Extracellular gadolinium-based contrast media: differences in diagnostic efficacy. , 2008, European journal of radiology.

[22]  J L Evelhoch,et al.  Key factors in the acquisition of contrast kinetic data for oncology , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[23]  W. J. Lorenz,et al.  Pharmacokinetic Mapping of the Breast: A New Method for Dynamic MR Mammography , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[24]  V. Runge,et al.  Double-Blind, Efficacy Evaluation of Gadobenate Dimeglumine, a Gadolinium Chelate With Enhanced Relaxivity, in Malignant Lesions of the Brain , 2002, Investigative radiology.

[25]  P. Tofts Modeling tracer kinetics in dynamic Gd‐DTPA MR imaging , 1997, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[26]  P. Tofts,et al.  Measurement of the blood‐brain barrier permeability and leakage space using dynamic MR imaging. 1. Fundamental concepts , 1991, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[27]  Francesco Sardanelli,et al.  Gadobenate Dimeglumine as a Contrast Agent for Dynamic Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Effect of Higher Initial Enhancement Thresholds on Diagnostic Performance , 2008, Investigative radiology.

[28]  M. Taupitz,et al.  Peripheral washout sign on contrast-enhanced MR images of the breast. , 1997, Radiology.

[29]  N. Hylton Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging as an imaging biomarker. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[30]  M. Kirchin,et al.  Gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA). An overview. , 1998, Investigative radiology.

[31]  Gary P Liney,et al.  Analysis of Prostate DCE-MRI: Comparison of Fast Exchange Limit and Fast Exchange Regimen Pharmacokinetic Models in the Discrimination of Malignant From Normal Tissue , 2009, Investigative radiology.

[32]  Xiangyu Yang,et al.  Improving the pharmacokinetic parameter measurement in dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI by use of the arterial input function: Theory and clinical application , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[33]  C. Colosimo,et al.  Gadobenate dimeglumine‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of intracranial metastases: Effect of dose on lesion detection and delineation , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[34]  F. Maggioni,et al.  Gadobenate dimeglumine 0.5 M solution for injection (MultiHance) as contrast agent for magnetic resonance imaging of the liver: mechanistic studies in animals. , 1999, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[35]  Walter H Backes,et al.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging kinetic parameters and molecular weight of dendritic contrast agents in tumor angiogenesis in mice. , 2005, Radiology.

[36]  M. Knopp,et al.  Primary and secondary brain tumors at MR imaging: bicentric intraindividual crossover comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadopentetate dimeglumine. , 2004, Radiology.

[37]  F. Schick,et al.  Relaxivity of Gadopentetate Dimeglumine (Magnevist), Gadobutrol (Gadovist), and Gadobenate Dimeglumine (MultiHance) in Human Blood Plasma at 0.2, 1.5, and 3 Tesla , 2006, Investigative radiology.

[38]  Marie-France Bellin,et al.  Extracellular gadolinium-based contrast media: an overview. , 2008, European journal of radiology.

[39]  Matthew J. McAuliffe,et al.  Medical Image Processing, Analysis and Visualization in clinical research , 2001, Proceedings 14th IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems. CBMS 2001.

[40]  M. van Buchem,et al.  Comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA) with gadopentetate dimeglumine (Gd-DTPA) for enhanced MR imaging of brain and spine tumours in children , 2005, Pediatric Radiology.

[41]  M. Knopp,et al.  Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast‐enhanced t1‐weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: Standardized quantities and symbols , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[42]  M. Port,et al.  How to Compare the Efficiency of Albumin-Bound and Nonalbumin-Bound Contrast Agents In Vivo: The Concept of Dynamic Relaxivity , 2005, Investigative radiology.

[43]  E. Rummeny,et al.  Low-Dose Gadobenate Dimeglumine Versus Standard Dose Gadopentetate Dimeglumine for Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Liver: An Intra-Individual Crossover Comparison , 2003, Investigative radiology.

[44]  B. Jenkins,et al.  Gadolinium chelates with weak binding to serum proteins. A new class of high-efficiency, general purpose contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging. , 1997, Investigative radiology.

[45]  L R Schad,et al.  Pharmacokinetic parameters in CNS Gd-DTPA enhanced MR imaging. , 1991, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[46]  M Brant-Zawadzki,et al.  Magnetic resonance of the brain: the optimal screening technique. , 1984, Radiology.

[47]  MR imaging of CNS tumors: are all contrast agents created the same? , 2006, Neuroradiology.

[48]  G Brix,et al.  Pathophysiologic basis of contrast enhancement in breast tumors , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.