Minimally invasive pedicle screw fixation

Lumbar fusion is a commonly practiced method of achieving spinal fixation in a variety of pathological entities that affect the spine. Pedicle screws are frequently used to provide immediate stabilization while the arthrodesis occurs. Conventional techniques of lumbar fusion and pedicle screw placement are associated with significant iatrogenic soft tissue injury and potential functional impairment. Minimally invasive lumbar fusion techniques seek to minimize this injury without adversely affecting the efficacy of the procedure. Percutaneous pedicle screws can be used to supplement various conventional and minimally invasive lumbar fusion techniques such as anterior lumbar interbody fusion, transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, posterior lumbar interbody fusion, and posterolateral fusion. Navigation through the pedicle is the most critical step of percutaneous pedicle screw placement, and consequently the surgeon must be comfortable interpreting radiographic images. Once the pedicle has been cannulated a K-wire is placed, and both tapping and screw placement are performed over the wire. This manuscript describes the technique required for safe minimally invasive pedicle screw placement and reviews both surgical pearls and pitfalls associated with the procedure.

[1]  H. Matsui,et al.  Serial changes in trunk muscle performance after posterior lumbar surgery. , 1999, Spine.

[2]  S. Eiskjær,et al.  1997 Volvo Award Winner in Clinical Studies: The Effect of Pedicle Screw Instrumentation on Functional Outcome and Fusion Rates in Posterolateral Lumbar Spinal Fusion: A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Study , 1997, Spine.

[3]  Yoshiharu Kawaguchi,et al.  Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery. Part 2: Histologic and histochemical analyses in humans. , 1994 .

[4]  Y. Rampersaud,et al.  Radiation Exposure to the Spine Surgeon During Fluoroscopically Assisted Pedicle Screw Insertion , 2000, Spine.

[5]  J. Partanen,et al.  Local Denervation Atrophy of Paraspinal Muscles in Postoperative Failed Back Syndrome , 1993, Spine.

[6]  M. Bruneau,et al.  Anterior cervical interbody fusion with hydroxyapatite graft and plate system. , 2001, Neurosurgical focus.

[7]  J. Styf,et al.  The Effects of External Compression by Three Different Retractors on Pressure in the Erector Spine Muscles During and After Posterior Lumbar Spine Surgery in Humans , 1998, Spine.

[8]  S Stenzler,et al.  Exposure of the orthopaedic surgeon to radiation. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[9]  D. Simon,et al.  Virtual Fluoroscopy: Computer-Assisted Fluoroscopic Navigation , 2001, Spine.

[10]  H. Matsui,et al.  Back Muscle Injury After Posterior Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Histologic and Enzymatic Analysis , 1996, Spine.

[11]  K. Foley,et al.  Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation of the lumbar spine. , 2001, Neurosurgical focus.

[12]  Kevin T Foley,et al.  Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation of the lumbar spine: preliminary clinical results. , 2002, Journal of neurosurgery.

[13]  B. Falck,et al.  The Lumbar Multifidus Muscle Five Years After Surgery for a Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Herniation , 1993, Spine.