Relationship between Object-Related Gestures and the Fractionated Object Knowledge System

The praxic semantic system comprises a conceptual knowledge system, which stores functional information about objects, and an action knowledge system, which stores information about the correct manipulation of objects. Moreover, mechanical problem solving abilities permit to take advantages from objects structure to use unfamiliar tools or discover alternative ways of using familiar tools. This study aims at investigating whether conceptual knowledge, action knowledge and mechanical problem solving abilities intervene in the production of gestures with objects (i.e. pantomimes and object use) by testing a group of brain damaged patients. Results showed that the mechanical problem solving abilities are not sufficient to produce pantomimes and that only severe deficits in the praxic semantic system would affect the production of these gestures. Furthermore, a double dissociation was observed between mechanical problem solving abilities and the capacity to use multiple objects. Overall, the results indicate that the praxic semantic system can be disrupted at different levels, suggesting that the semantic system for object has to be conceived as fractionated in different entities.

[1]  E. Roy,et al.  Current perspectives on disruptions to limb praxis. , 1983, Physical therapy.

[2]  D. Margolin.  The neuropsychology of Writing and Spelling: Semantic, Phonological, Motor, and Perceptual Processes , 1984, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[3]  K. Heilman,et al.  A Cognitive Neuropsychological Model of Limb Praxis , 1991 .

[4]  K M Heilman,et al.  Conceptual apraxia in Alzheimer's disease. , 1992, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[5]  M. Jeannerod.  The cognitive neuroscience of action , 1997, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[6]  G. Goldenberg,et al.  Tool use and mechanical problem solving in apraxia , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[7]  J R Hodges,et al.  "What" and "how": evidence for the dissociation of object knowledge and mechanical problem-solving skills in the human brain. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  Myrna F. Schwartz,et al.  Function and manipulation tool knowledge in apraxia: Knowing ‘what for’ but not ‘how’ , 2000 .

[9]  R. Cubelli,et al.  Cognition in Action: Testing a Model of Limb Apraxia , 2000, Brain and Cognition.

[10]  Roberto Cubelli,et al.  Double Dissociation between Meaningful and Meaningless Gesture Reproduction in Apraxia , 2001, Cortex.

[11]  L. Buxbaum,et al.  Knowledge of object manipulation and object function: dissociations in apraxic and nonapraxic subjects , 2002, Brain and Language.

[12]  A Bartolo,et al.  Pantomimes are special gestures which rely on working memory , 2003, Brain and Cognition.

[13]  M. Brett,et al.  Actions Speak Louder Than Functions: The Importance of Manipulability and Action in Tool Representation , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[14]  Georg Goldenberg,et al.  Defective pantomime of object use in left brain damage: apraxia or asymbolia? , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[15]  L. Buxbaum,et al.  Distinctions between manipulation and function knowledge of objects: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[16]  J. Hermsdörfer,et al.  It takes the whole brain to make a cup of coffee: the neuropsychology of naturalistic actions involving technical devices , 2005, Neuropsychologia.