Prospect Theory in Choice and Pricing Tasks

The most distinctive prediction of prospect theory is the fourfold pattern (FFP) of risk attitudes. People are said to be (1) risk-seeking over low-probability gains, (2) risk-averse over low-probability losses, (3) risk-averse over high-probability gains, and (4) risk-seeking over high-probability losses. Using simple gambles over real payoffs, we conduct a direct test of this FFP prediction. We find that when pricing gambles subjects’ risk attitudes are consistent with the FFP. However, when they choose between the gamble and its expected value, their decisions are not distinguishable from random choice and are often the exact opposite of the prediction. These results hold both between and within subjects, and are robust even when we allow the subjects to simultaneously review and change their price and choice decisions.

[1]  Richard Gonzalez,et al.  Curvature of the Probability Weighting Function , 1996 .

[2]  L. J. Savage,et al.  The Foundations of Statistics , 1955 .

[3]  John H. Kagel,et al.  Testing between alternative models of choice under uncertainty: Some initial results , 1990 .

[4]  Colin Camerer.  Bounded Rationality in Individual Decision Making , 1998 .

[5]  David W Harless,et al.  The predictive utility of generalized expected utility theories , 1994 .

[6]  P. Slovic,et al.  Reversals of preference between bids and choices in gambling decisions. , 1971 .

[7]  A. Tversky,et al.  Weighing Risk and Uncertainty , 1995 .

[8]  R. Sugden,et al.  Does the Random-Lottery Incentive System Elicit True Preferences? An Experimental Investigation , 2016 .

[9]  James C. Cox,et al.  Preference Reversals Without the Independence Axiom , 1989 .

[10]  C. S. Hong,et al.  Empirical Tests of Weighted Utility Theory , 1986 .

[11]  M. Machina.  Choice under Uncertainty: Problems Solved and Unsolved , 1987 .

[12]  Colin Camerer,et al.  The Effects of Financial Incentives in Experiments: A Review and Capital-Labor-Production Framework , 1999 .

[13]  J. Knetsch,et al.  Willingness to Pay and Compensation Demanded: Experimental Evidence of an Unexpected Disparity in Measures of Value , 1984 .

[14]  P. Slovic,et al.  Relative importance of probabilities and payoffs in risk taking , 1968 .

[15]  William S. Neilson,et al.  A Further Examination of Cumulative Prospect Theory Parameterizations , 2002 .

[16]  Colin Camerer.  An experimental test of several generalized utility theories , 1989 .

[17]  Colin Camerer.  Prospect Theory In The Wild: Evidence From The Field , 1998 .

[18]  C. Starmer.  Developments in Non-expected Utility Theory: The Hunt for a Descriptive Theory of Choice under Risk , 2000 .

[19]  H. Lindman.  Inconsistent preferences among gambles. , 1971 .

[20]  Richard Gonzalez,et al.  Common Consequence Conditions in Decision Making under Risk , 1998 .

[21]  Robin P. Cubitt,et al.  On the Validity of the Random Lottery Incentive System , 1998 .

[22]  Richard Gonzalez,et al.  On the Shape of the Probability Weighting Function , 1999, Cognitive Psychology.

[23]  J. Quiggin.  A theory of anticipated utility , 1982 .

[24]  A. Tversky,et al.  Who accepts Savage's axiom? , 1974 .

[25]  Charles A. Holt,et al.  Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects , 2002 .

[26]  Steven J. Kachelmeier,et al.  Examining Risk Preferences under High Monetary Incentives: Experimental Evidence from the People's Republic of China , 1992 .

[27]  P. Schoemaker.  The Expected Utility Model: Its Variants, Purposes, Evidence and Limitations , 1982 .

[28]  W. Edwards.  The prediction of decisions among bets. , 1955, Journal of experimental psychology.

[29]  William T. Harbaugh,et al.  Risk Attitudes of Children and Adults: Choices Over Small and Large Probability Gains and Losses , 2002 .

[30]  A. Tversky,et al.  Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty , 1992 .

[31]  On the Validity of the Random Lottery Incentive System , 1998 .

[32]  F. Ramsey.  The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays , 2001 .

[33]  A. Tversky,et al.  The Causes of Preference Reversal , 1990 .

[34]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Violations of the betweenness axiom and nonlinearity in probability , 1994 .

[35]  C. Plott,et al.  Economic Theory of Choice and the Preference Reversal Phenomenon , 1979 .

[36]  D. Prelec.  The Probability Weighting Function , 1998 .

[37]  J. Hey,et al.  INVESTIGATING GENERALIZATIONS OF EXPECTED UTILITY THEORY USING EXPERIMENTAL DATA , 1994, Experiments in Economics.

[38]  M. Degroot,et al.  Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. , 1964, Behavioral science.

[39]  P. Slovic,et al.  Preference Reversals: A Broader Perspective , 1983 .