Role of Contrast‐Enhanced Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography in Predicting Outcome in Patients with Known or Suspected Coronary Artery Disease

Although the application of intravenous contrast agents during stress echocardiography has been shown to improve diagnostic accuracy for detecting coronary artery disease, less information exists regarding its prognostic value. The aim of this study was to determine the role of contrast‐enhanced dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) for predicting future cardiac events in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). We studied 893 patients (mean age: 66, 581 men) with known or suspected CAD undergoing contrast‐enhanced DSE. Positivity was defined as new/worsened wall motion abnormality or fixed abnormality during stress. All patients were followed for 15 ± 10 months to evaluate hard cardiac events (cardiac death and nonfatal myocardial infarction) and total cardiac events (hard cardiac events, congestive heart failure, unstable angina, and late revascularization). Three patients were lost to follow‐up, and 128 patients developed cardiac events, including 21 hard cardiac events. The 3‐year event free survival rate was significantly lower in patients with positive DSE results than in those with negative DSE results. Stepwise Cox multivariate analysis revealed that positivity of DSE (P < 0.0001, Hazard ratio (HR): 2.48) and peak wall motion score index (WMSI) >1.5 (P < 0.0001, HR: 2.41) were independent predictors for total cardiac events. Considering hard cardiac events, the independent predictors were peak WMSI > 1.5 (P < 0.0001, HR: 6.65) and age > 70 years (P < 0.005, HR: 3.27). We conclude that contrast‐enhanced DSE provides important prognostic information for future cardiac events.

[1]  James R. Anderson,et al.  Diagnostic Accuracy and Prognostic Value of Dobutamine Stress Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography in Patients with Suspected Acute Coronary Syndromes , 2005, Echocardiography.

[2]  E. Schick,et al.  Cardiac events in patients with negative maximal versus negative submaximal dobutamine echocardiograms undergoing noncardiac surgery: importance of resting wall motion abnormalities. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Long-term prognosis after normal dobutamine stress echocardiography. , 2003, The American journal of cardiology.

[4]  M. Takeuchi,et al.  Which is the better method in detecting significant left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis during contrast-enhanced dobutamine stress echocardiography: coronary flow velocity reserve or wall-motion assessment? , 2003, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[5]  M. Takeuchi,et al.  Relation between changes in coronary flow velocity and in wall motion for assessing contractile reserve during dobutamine stress echocardiography. , 2002, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[6]  M. Kern,et al.  Effect of intravenous contrast for left ventricular opacification and border definition on sensitivity and specificity of dobutamine stress echocardiography compared with coronary angiography in technically difficult patients. , 2001, American heart journal.

[7]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Second harmonic imaging improves sensitivity of dobutamine stress echocardiography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. , 2001, American heart journal.

[8]  M. Takeuchi,et al.  Assessment of coronary flow velocity with transthoracic Doppler echocardiography during dobutamine stress echocardiography. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  P. Pellikka,et al.  Contrast dobutamine stress echocardiography: clinical practice assessment in 300 consecutive patients. , 2001, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[10]  M. Lauer,et al.  Prediction of mortality using dobutamine echocardiography. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Prognostic interaction between viability and residual myocardial ischemia by dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with acute myocardial infarction and mildly impaired left ventricular function. , 2001, The American journal of cardiology.

[12]  R. Hoffmann,et al.  Non-contrast second harmonic imaging improves interobserver agreement and accuracy of dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with impaired image quality , 2000, Heart.

[13]  G. Minardi,et al.  Prognostic value of pharmacological stress echocardiography in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease: a prospective, large-scale, multicenter, head-to-head comparison between dipyridamole and dobutamine test. Echo-Persantine International Cooperative (EPIC) and Echo-Dobutamine Int , 1999, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  A Garfinkel,et al.  Prognostic value of dobutamine stress echocardiography in predicting cardiac events in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. , 1999, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Long-term prognostic value of dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography in 1737 patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease: A single-center experience. , 1999, Circulation.

[16]  M. Previtali,et al.  Prognostic value of myocardial viability and ischemia detected by dobutamine stress echocardiography early after acute myocardial infarction treated with thrombolysis. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  J. Seward,et al.  Role of dobutamine stress echocardiography in predicting outcome in 860 patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. , 1998, Circulation.

[18]  J R Roelandt,et al.  Methodology, feasibility, safety and diagnostic accuracy of dobutamine stress echocardiography. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  I. R. Thomson,et al.  Prognostic value of dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography for peri-operative and late cardiac events in patients scheduled for vascular surgery. , 1997, European Heart Journal.

[20]  J. Seward,et al.  Comparison of ischemic response during exercise and dobutamine echocardiography in patients with left main coronary artery disease. , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[21]  R. Califf,et al.  27th Bethesda Conference: matching the intensity of risk factor management with the hazard for coronary disease events. Task Force 5. Stratification of patients into high, medium and low risk subgroups for purposes of risk factor management. , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[22]  U. Deligonul,et al.  Left ventricular volume changes during dobutamine stress echocardiography identify patients with more extensive coronary artery disease. , 1994, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[23]  K. Hammermeister,et al.  Variables predictive of survival in patients with coronary disease. Selection by univariate and multivariate analyses from the clinical, electrocardiographic, exercise, arteriographic, and quantitative angiographic evaluations. , 1979, Circulation.