Effects of attitudes and behaviours on learning mathematics with computer tools

This mixed-methods study investigates the effects of student attitudes and behaviours on the outcomes of learning mathematics with computer tools. A computer tool was used to help students develop the mathematical concept of function. In the whole sample (N=521), student attitudes could account for a 3.4 point difference in test scores between individuals on a 10-point scale. General attitude towards mathematics positively predicted test scores. However, more able students who were well-disposed towards mathematical computer tools achieved lower scores. Self-reported behaviours were unrelated to test scores. Detailed observation of a small number of students (N=8) revealed that positive attitudes towards mathematics and mathematical computer tools augmented exhibited learning behaviours, and that both a positive attitude to mathematical computer tools and exhibited learning behaviours benefited tool mastery. Although tool mastery and test scores are intimately related, reflective processes appear to mediate this relationship. Promoting learning with mathematical computer tools needs to take several factors into account, including improving student attitudes, raising levels of learning behaviours, and giving sufficient opportunity for constructing new mathematical knowledge within meaningful mathematical discourse.

[1]  Merrilyn Goos,et al.  Teachers' use of technology in secondary school mathematics classrooms , 2005 .

[2]  A. Bandura.  Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[3]  Slava Kalyuga,et al.  The Expertise Reversal Effect , 2003 .

[4]  Troels Lange.  Proceedings of the Fifth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education , 2007 .

[5]  K.P.E. Gravemeijer,et al.  Developing realistic mathematics education , 1994 .

[6]  Kenneth Tobin,et al.  International handbook of science education , 1998 .

[7]  Paul Drijvers,et al.  Tool use in a technology - rich learning arrangement for the concept of function , 2007 .

[8]  A. Su,et al.  The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics , 1932, The Mathematical Gazette.

[9]  S. Hennessy,et al.  Teacher perspectives on integrating ICT into subject teaching: commitment, constraints, caution, and change , 2005 .

[10]  J. Hox,et al.  Sufficient Sample Sizes for Multilevel Modeling , 2005 .

[11]  Stephen J. Pape,et al.  Developing Mathematical Thinking and Self-Regulated Learning: A Teaching Experiment in a Seventh-Grade Mathematics Classroom , 2003 .

[12]  Tom A B Snijders,et al.  Power and sample size in multilevel modeling , 2006 .

[13]  Kjell Granström,et al.  Important Prerequisites for Students' Mathematical Achievement. , 2007 .

[14]  Paul Drijvers,et al.  Tool use and functional thinking: An example of a form-function-shift. , 2009 .

[15]  P. Simons,et al.  Leren en instructie, Psychologie van de leerling en het leerproces , 1993 .

[16]  Ann M. Farrell.  Roles and Behaviors in Technology-Integrated Precalculus Classrooms , 1996 .

[17]  Michael Townsend,et al.  Evaluating change in attitude towards mathematics using the 'then-now' procedure in a cooperative learning programme. , 2003, The British journal of educational psychology.

[18]  Celia Hoyles,et al.  On the Integration of Digital Technologies into Mathematics Classrooms , 2004, Int. J. Comput. Math. Learn..

[19]  Hélia Oliveira,et al.  Development of Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers' Professional Knowledge and Identity in Working with Information and Communication Technology , 2002 .

[20]  Timothy J. Robinson,et al.  Multilevel Analysis: Techniques and Applications , 2002 .

[21]  최영한,et al.  미국 NCTM의 Principles and Standards for School Mathematics에 나타난 수학과 교수,학습의 이론 , 2002 .

[22]  Kaye Stacey,et al.  A Framework for Monitoring Progress and Planning Teaching Towards the Effective Use of Computer Algebra Systems , 2004, Int. J. Comput. Math. Learn..

[23]  Ed Dubinsky,et al.  APOS: A Constructivist Theory of Learning in Undergraduate Mathematics Education Research , 2001 .

[24]  J. Mason,et al.  Studying attitude to mathematics , 1998 .

[25]  Luc Trouche,et al.  The Complex Process of Converting Tools into Mathematical Instruments: The Case of Calculators , 1998, Int. J. Comput. Math. Learn..

[26]  A. Sfard.  On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin , 1991 .

[27]  Charles D. Barrett.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[28]  Rudolf vom Hofe.  Investigations into Students' Learning of Applications in Computer-Based Learning Environments , 2001 .

[29]  Kaye Stacey,et al.  A scale for monitoring students' attitudes to learning mathematics with technology , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[30]  Kenneth Tobin,et al.  Qualitative and Quantitative Landscapes of Classroom Learning Environments , 1998 .

[31]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Answering the Call for a Standard Reliability Measure for Coding Data , 2007 .

[32]  P.B.J. Boon,et al.  Algebra en applets, leren en onderwijzen , 2005 .

[33]  Ernst Z. Rothkopf,et al.  A macroscopic model of instruction and purposive learning: An overview , 1981 .

[34]  Juan Francisco Coll García,et al.  An Instrument to Help Teachers Assess Learners' Attitudes towards Multimedia Instruction , 2001 .

[35]  Bernice W. Polemis.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 1959 .

[36]  Miriam Gamoran Sherin,et al.  A Balancing Act: Developing a Discourse Community in a Mathematics Classroom , 2002 .

[37]  Roberta Terruggia,et al.  Reliability Analysis , 2021, Power System Protection.

[38]  M. Cox,et al.  ICT and pedagogy : a review of the research literature : a report to the DfES (ISBN: 1844781356) , 2003 .

[39]  Margaret Kendall,et al.  The Impact of Teacher Privileging on Learning Differentiation with Technology , 2001, Int. J. Comput. Math. Learn..

[40]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Social Cognition, from Brains to Culture , 1984 .

[41]  Yrjö Engeström,et al.  From design experiments to formative interventions , 2008, ICLS.

[42]  Derek Allan Holton,et al.  The teaching and learning of mathematics at university level : an ICMI study , 2001 .

[43]  Darrell L. Fisher,et al.  School-Level Environment and Student Outcomes in Mathematics , 2003 .

[44]  Barbara J. Dougherty,et al.  Mathematics Education Across Cultures: Proceedings of the 42nd Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education , 2020 .

[45]  S. Hennessy,et al.  Pupil perspectives on the contribution of information and communication technology to teaching and learning in the secondary school , 2003 .

[46]  Nancy L. Leech,et al.  A Call for Qualitative Power Analyses , 2007 .

[47]  P. Galbraith,et al.  Disentangling the Nexus: Attitudes to Mathematics and Technology in a Computer Learning Environment , 1998 .

[48]  F. Prins,et al.  Learning styles: self-reports versus thinking-aloud measures. , 2003, The British journal of educational psychology.

[49]  Editors-in-chief,et al.  Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science , 2005 .

[50]  R. Cattell.  The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors. , 1966, Multivariate behavioral research.

[51]  P. Kirschner,et al.  Mindtools for teacher communities: a European perspective , 2003 .

[52]  Michèle Artigue,et al.  Learning Mathematics in a CAS Environment: The Genesis of a Reflection about Instrumentation and the Dialectics between Technical and Conceptual Work , 2002, Int. J. Comput. Math. Learn..

[53]  M. Hannula.  Attitude towards mathematics: emotions, expectations and values , 2002 .

[54]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[55]  S. Siegel,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[56]  J. Richard Eiser,et al.  Attitude generalization: Similarity, valence, and extremity , 2007 .

[57]  G. A. Marcoulides,et al.  Multilevel Analysis Techniques and Applications , 2002 .

[58]  Ed Dubinsky,et al.  Development of the process conception of function , 1992 .