Potential and limitations of band selection and library pruning in sparse hyperspectral unmixing

Sparse regression using spectral libraries is nowadays a widely used technique for hyperspectral data unmixing. Assuming that the potential endmembers are collected in a large database of spectra, sparse unmixing finds the fractional abundances of a reduced set of constituent materials by solving convex optimization problems which target, at the same time, low data reconstruction errors. The large amount of data, jointly with other limitations related to the internal characteristics of the large spectral libraries (such as spectra similarity), affect the performance of sparse unmixing algorithms in terms of accuracy and running time. Recently, an efficient method based on a multi-measurement vector (MMV) approach was proposed to select, from a large library, suitable spectra for unmixing. Many research efforts have also been devoted to data dimensionality reduction techniques, of which band selection is very popular. In this work, we investigate the effects on the unmixing performance when the two techniques are applied simultaneously. Our experiments show that important improvements can be achieved, depending on several factors, such as: data noise, number of endmembers present in the dataset, number of spectra retained from the library, the order of operations, accuracy of data subspace estimation.

[1]  Antonio J. Plaza,et al.  MUSIC-CSR: Hyperspectral Unmixing via Multiple Signal Classification and Collaborative Sparse Regression , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[2]  Antonio J. Plaza,et al.  Sparse Unmixing of Hyperspectral Data , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[3]  José M. Bioucas-Dias,et al.  Alternating direction algorithms for constrained sparse regression: Application to hyperspectral unmixing , 2010, 2010 2nd Workshop on Hyperspectral Image and Signal Processing: Evolution in Remote Sensing.

[4]  Antonio J. Plaza,et al.  Hyperspectral Unmixing Overview: Geometrical, Statistical, and Sparse Regression-Based Approaches , 2012, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[5]  Jong Chul Ye,et al.  Compressive MUSIC: A Missing Link Between Compressive Sensing and Array Signal Processing , 2010, ArXiv.

[6]  Antonio J. Plaza,et al.  On the use of collaborative sparse regression in hyperspectral unmixing chains , 2014, 2014 6th Workshop on Hyperspectral Image and Signal Processing: Evolution in Remote Sensing (WHISPERS).

[7]  José M. Bioucas-Dias,et al.  Hyperspectral Subspace Identification , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[8]  John F. Mustard,et al.  Spectral unmixing , 2002, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[9]  Georges Bienvenu,et al.  Adaptivity to background noise spatial coherence for high resolution passive methods , 1980, ICASSP.

[10]  Antonio J. Plaza,et al.  Collaborative Sparse Regression for Hyperspectral Unmixing , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[11]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Average Case Analysis of Multichannel Sparse Recovery Using Convex Relaxation , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[12]  R. O. Schmidt,et al.  Multiple emitter location and signal Parameter estimation , 1986 .

[13]  Jong Chul Ye,et al.  Compressive MUSIC with optimized partial support for joint sparse recovery , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory Proceedings.

[14]  Jong Chul Ye,et al.  Compressive MUSIC: Revisiting the Link Between Compressive Sensing and Array Signal Processing , 2012, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.