Delineating the effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on myoelectric control based on slow cortical potentials

Active cortical participation in rehabilitation procedures may be facilitated by modulating neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) with electromyogram (EMG) and electroencephalogram (EEG) derived biopotentials, that represent simultaneous volitional effort. Here, the ability of the nervous system to respond to intrinsic or extrinsic stimuli by reorganizing its structure, function, and connections is called neuroplasticity. Neuroplasticity is involved in post-stroke functional disturbances, but also in rehabilitation. Beneficial neuroplastic changes may be facilitated with an adjuvant treatment with non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS). This paper presents the results from a motor cortex anodal tDCS-EEG/EMG study in healthy volunteers. We investigated slow cortical potentials (SCP) during self-initiated movements. In this preliminary study, we found that anodal tDCS increased baseline-normalized post-tDCS mean power in the Theta band (4-8Hz) of resting state EEG (60.71% vs. 8.36%; p<;0.01), and decreased the slope of post-tDCS SCP from motor task-related EEG (-6.43 au/sec vs. -4.86au/sec; p=0.021) when compared to sham tDCS. These preliminary results are discussed based on an accumulator model for spontaneous neural activity which postulates that a decision threshold applied to auto-correlated noise - in this case the output of a leaky stochastic accumulator - can account for the specific shape of the SCP prior to movement. We postulate that the anodal tDCS facilitated change in the slope of SCP may be related to the reaction times during a cued movement task since our prior work showed that anodal tDCS decreases the delay in initiation of muscle contraction and increases the delay in termination of muscle activity.

[1]  N. Birbaumer slow Cortical Potentials: Plasticity, Operant Control, and Behavioral Effects , 1999 .

[2]  J. Wolpaw Brain-computer interfaces. , 2013, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[3]  W. Martin Usrey,et al.  Attention Enhances Synaptic Efficacy and Signal-to-Noise in Neural Circuits , 2013, Nature.

[4]  B. Rockstroh,et al.  Slow potentials of the cerebral cortex and behavior. , 1990, Physiological reviews.

[5]  T. Hinterberger,et al.  Spontaneous EEG fluctuations determine the readiness potential: is preconscious brain activation a preparation process to move? , 2013, Experimental Brain Research.

[6]  Dario Farina,et al.  Comparison of movement related cortical potential in healthy people and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients , 2013, Front. Neurosci..

[7]  Patrick Simen,et al.  Evidence Accumulator or Decision Threshold – Which Cortical Mechanism are We Observing? , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[8]  M. K. van Vugt,et al.  EEG Oscillations Reveal Neural Correlates of Evidence Accumulation , 2012, Front. Neurosci..

[9]  A. Destexhe,et al.  Synaptic background activity enhances the responsiveness of neocortical pyramidal neurons. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  Patrick Berg,et al.  Advanced Tools for Digital EEG Review:: Virtual Source Montages, Whole-head Mapping, Correlation, and Phase Analysis , 2002, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[11]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[12]  Paul Sacco,et al.  Modulation of internal model formation during force field‐induced motor learning by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of primary motor cortex , 2009, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Facilitating myoelectric-control with transcranial direct current stimulation: a preliminary study in healthy humans , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[14]  Michael A. Nitsche,et al.  Neural mass model analysis of online modulation of electroencephalogram with transcranial direct current stimulation , 2013, 2013 6th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER).

[15]  P. Cisek,et al.  Decisions in Changing Conditions: The Urgency-Gating Model , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  Anirban Dutta,et al.  A neural mass model for simulating modulation of cortical activity with transcranial direct current stimulation , 2013 .

[17]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation , 2000, The Journal of physiology.

[18]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  An accumulator model for spontaneous neural activity prior to self-initiated movement , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  P. Celnik,et al.  Dissociating the roles of the cerebellum and motor cortex during adaptive learning: the motor cortex retains what the cerebellum learns. , 2011, Cerebral cortex.

[20]  Akio Kimura,et al.  Modulation of mu rhythm desynchronization during motor imagery by transcranial direct current stimulation , 2010, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.