Fluidization of Fine Powders: Cohesive versus Dynamical Aggregation

A typical fluidized bed consists of a vertical vessel closed at the bottom by a porous plate on which a bed of particles is resting. A fluid is supplied to the powder bed from below. At sufficiently high gas flow, the gas pressure drop balances the material weight per unit area and the bed expands in the so-called fluidized state. Traditionally, fine particles were impossible to fluidize by gas due to their strongly cohesive behavior. However, a new class of powders has arisen in the last few years that can be uniformly fluidized in a nonbubbling fluid-like state. Fine particles in these special powders aggregate according to a dynamic aggregation process, which ends up with the formation of porous light aggregates that can be fluidized by a gas, much like coarse beads are fluidized by a liquid. In this chapter, the classical Geldart diagram and the newly-reported fluid-like behavior exhibited by this special class of fine powders are reviewed. The study of fluidized beds of powders holds great interest due to the extraordinary physicochemical properties of these systems [1–3]. In 1973, Geldart [4] proposed an empirical classification of granular materials based on their fluidization properties that has since been widely used by chemical engineers. The classical Geldart’s diagram (shown in Fig. 1.1) summarizes empirical observations on fluidized beds in terms of particle size versus the relative density difference between the fluid phase and the solid particles. It is important to note that Geldart’s classification is based on the behavior of powders when they are fluidized by dry air at ambient pressure and temperature. Depending on the density ρp and size dp of particles, the fluidization behavior may be quite diverse. A useful nondimensional number to interpret the Geldart’s diagram is the granular Bond number Bog , defined as the ratio of interparticle attractive force F0 to particle weight Wp [5]. Powders are usually called granular materials when within the limit of noncohesive particles (Bog 1, typically dp 100 μm for dry particles). Gas-fluidized beds of granular materials generally bubble just beyond the onset of fluidization (Geldart B behavior) [4], which hampers contact between gas and solids, because of gas bypassing through bubbles, and curtails further bed expansion. For slightly cohesive beads (Bog ∼ 1), gas-fluidized beds exhibit a uniform fluidization interval at gas velocities above the minimum fluidization velocity. This state is characterized by a stable expansion of the bed prior to the bubbling onset (Geldart A behavior) [4]. The relevance of the J.M. Valverde Millán, Fluidization of Fine Powders, Particle Technology Series 18, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-5587-1_1, © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013 1

[1]  Model for the elasticity of compressed emulsions. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[2]  Jose Manuel Valverde,et al.  Effect of vibration on agglomerate particulate fluidization , 2006 .

[3]  J. Grace,et al.  Sorption-enhanced steam reforming of methane in a fluidized bed reactor with dolomite as CO2-acceptor , 2006 .

[4]  J. Valverde,et al.  Random loose packing of cohesive granular materials , 2006 .

[5]  J. Valverde,et al.  Effect of vibration on the stability of a gas-fluidized bed of fine powder. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[6]  Jamal Chaouki,et al.  Effect of interparticle forces on the hydrodynamic behaviour of fluidized aerogels , 1985 .

[7]  R. Withers,et al.  Space-charge effects in aerosol charging and migration , 1981 .

[8]  Vasilije Manovic,et al.  Thermal activation of CaO-based sorbent and self-reactivation during CO2 capture looping cycles. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[9]  Jose Manuel Valverde,et al.  Types of gas fluidization of cohesive granular materials. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[10]  R. Jackson,et al.  The mechanics of gas fluidized beds with an interval of stable fluidization , 1993, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[11]  Bastien Chopard,et al.  A lattice Boltzmann study of the hydrodynamic properties of 3D fractal aggregates , 2006, Math. Comput. Simul..

[12]  The influence of temperature on the quality of gas fluidization , 1994 .

[13]  R. Elsdon,et al.  Heat transfer in a gas fluidized bed assisted by an alternating electric field , 1977 .

[14]  D. Maugis Adhesion of spheres : the JKR-DMT transition using a dugdale model , 1992 .

[15]  Norman A. Fleck,et al.  Frictionless indentation of dissimilar elastic-plastic spheres , 2000 .

[16]  Norman A. Fleck,et al.  The viscoplastic compaction of composite powders , 1999 .

[17]  J. Valverde,et al.  Compaction of fine powders: from fluidized agglomerates to primary particles , 2006 .

[18]  Hideto Yoshida,et al.  A new method for the control of dilute suspension sedimentation by horizontal movement , 2005 .

[19]  J. Valverde,et al.  Aggregation and sedimentation in gas-fluidized beds of cohesive powders. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[20]  Antonio Ramos,et al.  The tensile strength of cohesive powders and its relationship to consolidation, free volume and cohesivity , 1998 .

[21]  J. Mellema,et al.  The influence of particle size on the magnetorheological properties of an inverse ferrofluid , 2000 .

[22]  O. Levenspiel,et al.  Vibrating beds of fine particles: Estimation of interparticle forces from expansion and pressure drop experiments , 1992 .

[23]  J. Valverde,et al.  High viscosity gas fluidization of fine particles: An extended window of quasihomogeneous flow. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[24]  Dimitri Gidaspow,et al.  Effect of electric field on the hydrodynamics of fluidized nanoparticles , 2008 .

[25]  Borja Arias,et al.  An analysis of the effect of carbonation conditions on CaO deactivation curves , 2011 .

[26]  Abdelhamid Ajbar,et al.  Fluidization of nano-powders: Effect of sound vibration and pre-mixing with group A particles , 2011 .

[27]  Hiroyuki Hatano,et al.  Ultrafine particle fluidization and its application to photocatalytic NOx treatment , 2001 .

[28]  M. Glor,et al.  Hazards due to electrostatic charging of powders , 1985 .

[29]  Kurt Liffman,et al.  Use of discrete element method simulation in studying fluidization characteristics: influence of interparticle force , 2001 .

[30]  J. Valverde,et al.  Magnetic field induced inversion in the effect of particle size on powder cohesiveness. , 2010, The Journal of chemical physics.

[31]  D. Durian,et al.  Foam mechanics at the bubble scale. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[32]  S. Manley,et al.  Limits to gelation in colloidal aggregation. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[33]  D. Sutherland,et al.  Sedimentation of a porous sphere , 1970 .

[34]  Julio Soria,et al.  Laser-based planar imaging of nano-particle fluidization: Part I—determination of aggregate size and shape , 2006 .

[35]  J. Valverde,et al.  Fluid to solid transition in magnetofluidized beds of fine powders , 2010 .

[36]  J. Carlos Abanades,et al.  CO2 Capture Capacity of CaO in Long Series of Carbonation/Calcination Cycles , 2006 .

[37]  E. J. Anthony,et al.  Capture of CO2 from combustion gases in a fluidized bed of CaO , 2004 .

[38]  Looking for self-organized critical behavior in avalanches of slightly cohesive powders. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[39]  J. Valverde,et al.  Electromechanics of fluidized beds of nanoparticles. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[40]  E. Barthel On the Description of the Adhesive Contact of Spheres with Arbitrary Interaction Potentials , 1998 .

[41]  B. V. Derjaguin,et al.  Effect of contact deformations on the adhesion of particles , 1975 .

[42]  M. Peters,et al.  Filtration of airborne dust in a triboelectrically charged fluidized bed , 1983 .

[43]  H. Mizes,et al.  ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY ADHESION MEASUREMENTS OF SURFACE-MODIFIED TONERS FOR XEROGRAPHIC APPLICATIONS , 1994 .

[44]  Rajesh N. Dave,et al.  Fluidization of fine and ultrafine particles using nitrogen and neon as fluidizing gases , 2008 .

[45]  V. Prasad,et al.  Glasslike kinetic arrest at the colloidal-gelation transition. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[46]  D. Hays Adhesion of charged particles , 1995 .

[47]  Runyu Yang,et al.  Computer simulation of the packing of fine particles , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[48]  R. Jackson,et al.  The nature of aggregative and particulate fluidization , 1964 .

[49]  K. Rietema,et al.  The Dynamics of Fine Powders , 1991 .

[50]  J. Hristov Fluidization of ferromagnetic particles in a magnetic field Part 2: Field effects on preliminarily gas fluidized bed , 1998 .

[51]  L. Vu-Quoc,et al.  Normal and tangential force-displacement relations for frictional elasto-plastic contact of spheres , 2001 .

[52]  Ayokunle Omosebi,et al.  Fluidization enhancement of agglomerates of metal oxide nanopowders by microjets , 2010 .

[53]  P. Carman Fluid flow through granular beds , 1997 .

[54]  Jose Manuel Valverde,et al.  The settling of fine cohesive powders , 2001 .

[55]  Wei Fei,et al.  Fluidization and agglomerate structure of SiO2 nanoparticles , 2002 .

[56]  J. C. Abanades,et al.  Carbon dioxide capture from combustion flue gases with a calcium oxide chemical loop. Experimental results and process development , 2010 .

[57]  Ching S. Chang,et al.  Interparticle forces and displacements in granular materials , 1997 .

[58]  D. Geldart Types of gas fluidization , 1973 .

[59]  Naoko Ellis,et al.  Scalable gas-phase processes to create nanostructured particles , 2010 .

[60]  G. Pataro,et al.  The influence of operating temperature on the dense phase properties of bubbling fluidized beds of solids , 2002 .

[61]  E. Pefferkorn,et al.  Structure and cohesion of weakly agglomerated fractal systems , 2004 .

[62]  Roland Clift,et al.  An electromechanical valve for solids , 1992 .

[63]  L. Torres-Martínez,et al.  Engineering of SiO 2 Nanoparticles for Optimal Performance in Nano Cement-Based Materials , 2009 .

[64]  L. Cipelletti,et al.  Jamming phase diagram for attractive particles , 2001, Nature.

[65]  J. Lacaze,et al.  Cold compaction of iron powders—relations between powder morphology and mechanical properties: Part I: Powder preparation and compaction , 2002 .

[66]  J. Valverde,et al.  Self-diffusion in a gas-fluidized bed of fine powder. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[67]  J. Valverde,et al.  Enhancement of fast CO2 capture by a nano-SiO2/CaO composite at Ca-looping conditions. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[68]  L. Kogut,et al.  Elastic-Plastic Contact Analysis of a Sphere and a Rigid Flat , 2002 .

[69]  Hubert M. Pollock,et al.  Surface forces, deformation and adherence at metal microcontacts , 1984 .

[70]  D. Klingenberg,et al.  The small shear rate response of electrorheological suspensions. II. Extension beyond the point–dipole limit , 1991 .

[71]  Antonio Castellanos,et al.  The relationship between attractive interparticle forces and bulk behaviour in dry and uncharged fine powders , 2005 .

[72]  Hugo A. Jakobsen,et al.  3D Simulation of bubbling fluidized bed reactors for sorption enhanced steam methane reforming processes , 2010 .

[73]  Sotiris E. Pratsinis,et al.  Fractal Analysis of Flame-Synthesized Nanostructured Silica and Titania Powders Using Small-Angle X-ray Scattering , 1998 .

[74]  M. Quintanilla,et al.  Jamming threshold of dry fine powders. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[75]  Hiroyuki Hatano,et al.  Modeling for size reduction of agglomerates in nanoparticle fluidization , 2004 .

[76]  J. Valverde,et al.  Electrofluidized bed of silica nanoparticles , 2009 .

[77]  J. Valverde,et al.  Adhesion force between fine particles with controlled surface properties , 2006 .

[78]  Sinisa Dj. Mesarovic,et al.  Adhesive contact of elastic–plastic spheres , 2000 .

[79]  H. Sunada,et al.  [Theoretical studies on structures of the sedimentation bed of spherical particles]. , 1968, Yakugaku zasshi : Journal of the Pharmaceutical Society of Japan.

[80]  Jose Manuel Valverde,et al.  CO2 capture enhancement in a fluidized bed of a modified Geldart C powder , 2012 .

[81]  H. Schubert,et al.  Capillary forces - modeling and application in particulate technology , 1984 .

[82]  K. Suh,et al.  Bidisperse electrorheological fluids using hydrolyzed styrene-acrylonitrile copolymer particles: synergistic effect of mixed particle size. , 2004, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[83]  G. Bossis,et al.  Many-body electrostatic interactions in electrorheological fluids. , 1993, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[84]  L. Fan,et al.  Electrostatic characteristics of hydrated lime powder during transport , 1996 .

[85]  J. Valverde,et al.  Correlation between bulk stresses and interparticle contact forces in fine powders. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[86]  Rajesh N. Dave,et al.  Nanofluidization as affected by vibration and electrostatic fields , 2008 .

[87]  H. C. Hamaker The London—van der Waals attraction between spherical particles , 1937 .

[88]  J. Chaouki,et al.  Improvement of the fluidisability of Ni/SiO2 aerogels by reducing interparticle forces , 1991 .

[89]  P. Mills,et al.  Effect of particle size and interparticle force on the fluidization behavior of gas-fluidized beds. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[90]  Martin Glor,et al.  ELECTROSTATIC HAZARDS IN POWDER HANDLING , 1988 .

[91]  A. Schofield,et al.  On The Yielding of Soils , 1958 .

[92]  I. Webman,et al.  Elastic Properties of Random Percolating Systems , 1984 .

[93]  Alan W. Weimer,et al.  Aggregation behavior of nanoparticles in fluidized beds , 2005 .

[94]  Gemma Grasa,et al.  Conceptual design of a three fluidised beds combustion system capturing CO2 with CaO , 2011 .

[95]  J. Valverde,et al.  The yield stress of jammed magnetofluidized beds , 2013 .

[96]  Arnaud Fernandez,et al.  TEM study of fractal scaling in nanoparticle agglomerates obtained by gas-phase condensation , 2000 .

[97]  Farhang Radjai,et al.  BIMODAL CHARACTER OF STRESS TRANSMISSION IN GRANULAR PACKINGS , 1998 .

[98]  D. Gidaspow,et al.  Explosive dissemination and flow of nanoparticles , 2006 .

[99]  F. Pontiga,et al.  Improving the gas-solids contact efficiency in a fluidized bed of CO2 adsorbent fine particles. , 2011, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[100]  Jose Manuel Valverde,et al.  Electrofluidization of Silica Nanoparticle Agglomerates , 2012 .

[101]  Wen-Ching Yang,et al.  Fluidization of Fine Cohesive Powders and Nanoparticles-A Review , 2005 .

[102]  L. Sander,et al.  Diffusion-limited aggregation, a kinetic critical phenomenon , 1981 .

[103]  A. Ramos,et al.  An automated apparatus for measuring the tensile strength and compressibility of fine cohesive powders , 2000 .

[104]  P. Mills,et al.  Experimental study on the dynamics of gas-fluidized beds. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[105]  Bastien Chopard,et al.  Hydrodynamic properties of fractal aggregates in 2D using Lattice Boltzmann simulation , 2004, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[106]  Chao Zhu,et al.  Gas fluidization characteristics of nanoparticle agglomerates , 2005 .

[107]  J. Valverde,et al.  The tensile strength and free volume of cohesive powders compressed by gas flow , 2001 .

[108]  Reifenberger,et al.  Identification of electrostatic and van der Waals interaction forces between a micrometer-size sphere and a flat substrate. , 1996, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[109]  J. Valverde,et al.  Interparticle contact forces in fine cohesive powders. Theory and experiments , 2003 .

[110]  Josep Manuel,et al.  Fluidization of Fine Powders , 2013 .

[111]  Rajesh N. Dave,et al.  Fluidization of nanoagglomerates in a rotating fluidized bed , 2006 .

[112]  T. Witten,et al.  Mechanical stability of tenuous objects , 1984 .

[113]  Elisabeth Guazzelli,et al.  Experimental investigation on the secondary instability of liquid-fluidized beds and the formation of bubbles , 2002, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[114]  Rajesh N. Dave,et al.  Aerated vibrofluidization of silica nanoparticles , 2004 .

[115]  G. Donsì,et al.  Cohesive forces between particles of fluid-bed catalysts , 1976 .

[116]  A Micro-mechanical Modelling of the Pressure Dependence of the Void Index of a Granular Assembly: , 2005, cond-mat/0506344.

[117]  K. Johnson,et al.  An alternative to the Maugis model of adhesion between elastic spheres , 1998 .

[118]  Christopher W. Jones,et al.  Adsorbent Materials for Carbon Dioxide Capture from Large Anthropogenic Point Sources , 2010 .

[119]  Wei Wu,et al.  Hydrodynamic characteristics of magnetically stabilized fluidized admixture beds of iron and copper particles , 1999 .

[120]  C. L. Martin Elasticity, fracture and yielding of cold compacted metal powders , 2004 .

[121]  C. Gallo,et al.  Some charge exchange phenomena explained by a classical model of the work function , 1976 .

[122]  A. Castellanos,et al.  The transitional behaviour of avalanches in cohesive granular materials , 2006 .

[123]  Rajesh N. Dave,et al.  Enhanced fluidization of nanoparticles in an oscillating magnetic field , 2005 .

[124]  T. W. Johnson,et al.  Electromechanics of Electrofluidized Beds , 1975 .

[125]  E. E. Groop,et al.  Insulator–insulator contact charging and its relationship to atmospheric pressure , 2004 .

[126]  José Manuel Valverde Millán,et al.  Fluidization of nanoparticles: A modified Richardson-Zaki Law , 2006 .

[127]  Rajesh N. Dave,et al.  Sound assisted fluidization of nanoparticle agglomerates , 2004 .

[128]  Feng Electrostatic interaction between two charged dielectric spheres in contact , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[129]  Liang-Shih Fan,et al.  Subpilot Demonstration of the Carbonation−Calcination Reaction (CCR) Process: High-Temperature CO2 and Sulfur Capture from Coal-Fired Power Plants , 2010 .

[130]  John Nijenhuis,et al.  Atmospheric Pressure Process for Coating Particles Using Atomic Layer Deposition , 2009 .

[131]  Hans Rumpf,et al.  Grundlagen und Methoden des Granulierens , 1958 .

[132]  Jose Manuel Valverde,et al.  Fluidization of nanoparticles: A simple equation for estimating the size of agglomerates , 2008 .

[133]  Mónica Alonso,et al.  Comparison of CaO-Based Synthetic CO2 Sorbents under Realistic Calcination Conditions , 2007 .

[134]  Paul S. Fennell,et al.  The calcium looping cycle for large-scale CO2 capture , 2010 .

[135]  O. Molerus,et al.  Interpretation of Geldart's type A, B, C and D powders by taking into account interparticle cohesion forces , 1982 .

[136]  D. Rimai,et al.  Surface roughness and its influence on particle adhesion using atomic force techniques , 1995 .

[137]  Mojtaba Ghadiri,et al.  Triboelectric charging of powders: A review , 2010 .

[138]  J. Valverde,et al.  Effects of Particle Size and Field Orientation on the Yield Stress of Magnetostabilized Fluidized Beds , 2012 .

[139]  Jose Manuel Valverde,et al.  Fluidization of nanopowders: a review , 2012, Journal of Nanoparticle Research.

[140]  Jose Manuel Valverde,et al.  Fluidization, bubbling and jamming of nanoparticle agglomerates , 2007 .

[141]  Juan Carlos Abanades,et al.  Comparison of experimental results from three dual fluidized bed test facilities capturing CO2 with CaO , 2011 .

[142]  Rajesh N. Dave,et al.  Enhanced nanofluidization by alternating electric fields , 2009 .