Concept relationship editor: a visual interface to support the assertion of synonymy relationships between taxonomic classifications

An increasingly common approach being taken by taxonomists to define the relationships between taxa in alternative hierarchical classifications is to use a set-based notation which states relationship between two taxa from alternative classifications. Textual recording of these relationships is cumbersome and difficult for taxonomists to manage. While text based GUI tools are beginning to appear which ease the process, these have several limitations. Interactive visual tools offer greater potential to allow taxonomists to explore the taxa in these hierarchies and specify such relationships. This paper describes the Concept Relationship Editor, an interactive visualisation tool designed to support the assertion of relationships between taxonomic classifications. The tool operates using an interactive space-filling adjacency layout which allows users to expand multiple lists of taxa with common parents so they can explore and assert relationships between two classifications.

[1]  Martin R. Gibbs,et al.  Mediating intimacy: designing technologies to support strong-tie relationships , 2005, CHI.

[2]  Jessie B. Kennedy,et al.  Coordinated graph and scatter-plot views for the visual exploration of microarray time-series data , 2003, IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization 2003 (IEEE Cat. No.03TH8714).

[3]  Mark Sifer.  Filter co-ordinations for exploring multi-dimensional data , 2006, J. Vis. Lang. Comput..

[4]  Nicholas Chen,et al.  TreeJuxtaposer : Scalable Tree Comparison using Focus + Context with Guaranteed Visibility , 2006 .

[5]  Martin Graham,et al.  Extending Taxonomic Visualisation to Incorporate Synonymy and Structural Markers , 2005, Inf. Vis..

[6]  Sakti Pramanik,et al.  Data model and comparison and query methods for interacting classifications in a taxonomic database , 1996 .

[7]  Jonathan C. Roberts,et al.  On encouraging multiple views for visualization , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE Conference on Information Visualization. An International Conference on Computer Visualization and Graphics (Cat. No.98TB100246).

[8]  Cynthia A. Brewer,et al.  Guidelines for use of the perceptual dimensions of color for mapping and visualization , 1994, Electronic Imaging.

[9]  Walter G. Berendsohn,et al.  The concept of "potential taxa" in databases , 1995 .

[10]  Martin Graham,et al.  A comparison of set-based and graph-based visualisations of overlapping classification hierarchies , 2000, AVI '00.

[11]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Tree-maps: a space-filling approach to the visualization of hierarchical information structures , 1991, Proceeding Visualization '91.

[12]  Andrew Cumming,et al.  Animated Interval Scatter-Plot Views for the Exploratory Analysis of Large-Scale Microarray Time-Course Data , 2005, Inf. Vis..

[13]  J. Stasko,et al.  Focus+context display and navigation techniques for enhancing radial, space-filling hierarchy visualizations , 2000, IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization 2000. INFOVIS 2000. Proceedings.

[14]  Catherine Plaisant,et al.  TreePlus: Interactive Exploration of Networks with Enhanced Tree Layouts , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[15]  Danny Holten,et al.  Hierarchical Edge Bundles: Visualization of Adjacency Relations in Hierarchical Data , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[16]  Benjamin B. Bederson,et al.  Fisheye menus , 2000, UIST '00.

[17]  Hongan Wang,et al.  Visualization of large hierarchical data by circle packing , 2006, CHI.

[18]  Ramana Rao,et al.  A focus+context technique based on hyperbolic geometry for visualizing large hierarchies , 1995, CHI '95.

[19]  Tamara Munzner,et al.  Exploring Large Graphs in 3D Hyperbolic Space , 1998, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[20]  Chang-Sung Jeong,et al.  Reconfigurable disc trees for visualizing large hierarchical information space , 1998, Proceedings IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization (Cat. No.98TB100258).

[21]  Trevor Paterson,et al.  Scientific Names Are Ambiguous as Identifiers for Biological Taxa: Their Context and Definition Are Required for Accurate Data Integration , 2005, DILS.

[22]  Martin Graham,et al.  Combining linking and focusing techniques for a multiple hierarchy visualisation , 2001, Proceedings Fifth International Conference on Information Visualisation.

[23]  M. Sheelagh T. Carpendale,et al.  ArcTrees: Visualizing Relations in Hierarchical Data , 2005, EuroVis.