Spoofing the Limit Order Book: An Agent-Based Model

We present an agent-based model of manipulating prices in financial markets through spoofing: submitting spurious orders to mislead traders who observe the order book. Built around the standard limit-order mechanism, our model captures a complex market environment with combined private and common values, the latter represented by noisy observations upon a dynamic fundamental time series. We consider background agents following two types of trading strategies: zero intelligence (ZI) that ignores the order book and heuristic belief learning (HBL) that exploits the order book to predict price outcomes. By employing an empirical game-theoretic analysis to derive approximate strategic equilibria, we demonstrate the effectiveness of HBL and the usefulness of order book information in a range of non-spoofing environments. We further show that a market with HBL traders is spoofable, in that a spoofer can qualitatively manipulate prices towards its desired direction. After re-equilibrating games with spoofing, we find spoofing generally hurts market surplus and decreases the proportion of HBL. However, HBL's persistence in most environments with spoofing indicates a consistently spoofable market. Our model provides a way to quantify the effect of spoofing on trading behavior and efficiency, and thus measures the profitability and cost of an important form of market manipulation.

[1]  J. Farmer,et al.  The Predictive Power of Zero Intelligence in Financial Markets , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  Wing Lon Ng,et al.  Can a zero-intelligence plus model explain the stylized facts of financial time series data? , 2012, AAMAS.

[3]  Peter A. Beling,et al.  Agent based model of the E-Mini Future: Application for policy making , 2012, Proceedings Title: Proceedings of the 2012 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC).

[4]  Michael P. Wellman,et al.  Latency arbitrage in fragmented markets: A strategic agent-based analysis , 2017, Algorithmic Finance.

[5]  A. Kyle,et al.  The Flash Crash: High-Frequency Trading in an Electronic Market , 2017 .

[6]  Michael P. Wellman,et al.  Scaling simulation-based game analysis through deviation-preserving reduction , 2012, AAMAS.

[7]  Rajarshi Das,et al.  High-performance bidding agents for the continuous double auction , 2001, EC '01.

[8]  B. LeBaron Agent-based Computational Finance , 2006 .

[9]  Michael P. Wellman Trading Agents , 2011, Trading Agents.

[10]  P WellmanMichael,et al.  Welfare effects of market making in continuous double auctions , 2017 .

[11]  Dave Cliff,et al.  ZIP60: Further Explorations in the Evolutionary Design of Trader Agents and Online Auction-Market Mechanisms , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[12]  R. Palmer,et al.  Time series properties of an artificial stock market , 1999 .

[13]  Michael P. Wellman Methods for Empirical Game-Theoretic Analysis , 2006, AAAI.

[14]  Gregory Laughlin,et al.  The Flash Crash: A New Deconstruction , 2017 .

[15]  Gerald Tesauro,et al.  Strategic sequential bidding in auctions using dynamic programming , 2002, AAMAS '02.

[16]  Peter McBurney,et al.  Learning unfair trading: A market manipulation analysis from the reinforcement learning perspective , 2015, 2016 IEEE Conference on Evolving and Adaptive Intelligent Systems (EAIS).

[17]  John Dickhaut,et al.  Price Formation in Double Auctions , 2001, E-Commerce Agents.

[18]  Jonas Gloeckner,et al.  The Double Auction Market Institutions Theories And Evidence , 2016 .

[19]  Michael P. Wellman,et al.  Welfare Effects of Market Making in Continuous Double Auctions , 2015, AAMAS.

[20]  E. Lee,et al.  Microstructure-Based Manipulation: Strategic Behavior and Performance of Spoofing Traders , 2009 .

[21]  Dhananjay K. Gode,et al.  Allocative Efficiency of Markets with Zero-Intelligence Traders: Market as a Partial Substitute for Individual Rationality , 1993, Journal of Political Economy.

[22]  R. Bookstaber,et al.  Using Agent-Based Models for Analyzing Threats to Financial Stability , 2012 .

[23]  Michael P. Wellman,et al.  Methods for empirical game-theoretic analysis (extended abstract) , 2006 .

[24]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Strategic bidding in continuous double auctions , 2008, Artif. Intell..

[25]  Peter A. Beling,et al.  An agent based model of the E-Mini S&P 500 applied to flash crash analysis , 2011, 2012 IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence for Financial Engineering & Economics (CIFEr).

[26]  D. Cliff Minimal-Intelligence Agents for Bargaining Behaviors in Market-Based Environments , 1997 .

[27]  D. Friedman The Double Auction Market Institution: A Survey , 2018 .

[28]  Zhuoshu Li,et al.  An Agent-Based Model of Competition Between Financial Exchanges: Can Frequent Call Mechanisms Drive Trade Away from CDAs? , 2016, AAMAS.

[29]  Steven Gjerstad,et al.  The Competitive Market Paradox , 2007 .