A Coached Collaborative Learning Environment for Entity-Relationship Modeling

We discuss the design of an agent for coaching collaborative learning in a distance learning context. The learning domain is entity-relationship modeling, a domain in which collaborative problem solving is regularly practiced, and for which there exist formally interpretable representations of problem solutions known as entity-relationship diagrams. The design of the coach was based on socio-cognitive conflict theory, which states that collaborative learning is effective to the extent that learners identify and discuss conflicts in their beliefs. Students begin by constructing individual entity-relationship diagrams expressing their solution to a database modeling problem, and then work in small groups to agree upon a group solution. The coaching agent leverages learning opportunities by encouraging students to share and discuss solution components that conflict with components of the group solution. Our work shows one way to utilize domain specific knowledge in order to facilitate collaboration.

[1]  Michael J. Baker,et al.  Missed opportunities for learning in collaborative problem-solving interactions , 1995 .

[2]  Adrian Gordon,et al.  A Collaborative Learning Environment for Data Modeling , 1998, FLAIRS.

[3]  N. Webb Student Interaction and Learning in Small Groups , 1982 .

[4]  A. Gokhale Collaborative Learning Enhances Critical Thinking , 1995 .

[5]  Robert M. Aiken,et al.  Monitoring computer-based collaborative problem solving , 1995 .

[6]  Dinesh Batra,et al.  Novice errors in conceptual database design , 1994 .

[7]  Graeme G. Shanks,et al.  Conceptual Data Modelling: an empirical study of expert and novice data modellers , 1997, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..

[8]  Shamkant B. Navathe,et al.  Conceptual Database Design: An Entity-Relationship Approach , 1991 .

[9]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  An Architecture for Intelligent Collaborative Educational Systems. , 1997 .

[10]  Annemarie S. Palincsar,et al.  Group processes in the classroom. , 1996 .

[11]  Judy Robertson,et al.  BetterBlether: The Design and Evaluation of a Discussion Tool for education , 1998 .

[12]  Daniel D. Suthers Preferences for Model Selection in Explanation , 1993, IJCAI.

[13]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Guided, Cooperative Learning and Individual Knowledge Acquisition , 2018, Knowing, Learning, and Instruction.

[14]  Yoneo Yano,et al.  Learner Models for Supporting Awareness and Collaboration in a CSCL Environment , 1996, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[15]  David W. Johnson Cooperative Learning: Increasing College Faculty Instructional Productivity. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 4, 1991. , 1991 .

[16]  Amy Soller,et al.  Promoting Effective Peer Interaction in an Intelligent Collaborative Learning System , 1998, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[17]  Michael J. Baker,et al.  Flexibly structuring the interaction in a CSCL environment , 1996 .

[18]  Johanna Kipperman,et al.  Learning through Discussion , 1994 .

[19]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  Automated Advice-Giving Strategies for Scientific Inquiry , 1996, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[20]  Eva Mary Bures,et al.  Computer‐supported collaborative learning and distance education , 1996 .

[21]  Laurian M. Chirica,et al.  The entity-relationship model: toward a unified view of data , 1975, SIGF.