Flatness of musculoskeletal systems under functional electrical stimulation

Control of musculoskeletal yy system through functional electrical stimulation (FES) still remains a complex and a challenging process. Indeed, the used musculoskeletal models are often complex and highly nonlinear, which makes their control and inversion (getting appropriate inputs from a desired outputs) very difficult. On the other hand, the system flatness has been proved to be an efficient method for nonlinear system control, since in this technique, the nonlinear system can be controlled more easily through its flat outputs. Therefore, it is very promising to apply this control technique on the musculoskeletal system, to overcome its problems, which has never been explored so far. The aim of this work is to explore the flatness technique and its feasibility on the knee joint musculoskeletal system in dynamic condition, controlled by electrically stimulated quadriceps muscle. A mathematical proof developed in the current work highlights that the two-input musculoskeletal system is flat, where two flat outputs are the muscle stiffness and the knee joint angle. It also shows that the single-input musculoskeletal system is not flat. These results are crucial for flatness-based control of musculoskeletal systems, since this model in literature deals with a single input. Simulation results in open-loop control of two-input system highlight the consistency of the mathematical proof, and the applicability of this technique on the musculoskeletal system, where its simulated outputs fit perfectly with the desired ones if the model is considered perfect. When, one parameter of the system is not well estimated (10% of error), simulations show limits of open-loop control, with a joint angle rms deviation of 4%; hence, the closed-loop control should be considered. Graphical Abstract Flatness Study and control of Musculoskeletal systems.

[1]  D. Guiraud,et al.  An implantable neuroprosthesis for standing and walking in paraplegia: 5-year patient follow-up , 2006, Journal of neural engineering.

[2]  Philippe Poignet,et al.  Closed Loop Nonlinear Model Predictive Control Applied On Paralyzed Muscles To Restore Lower Limbs Functions , 2006, 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[3]  Jean Lévine On necessary and sufficient conditions for differential flatness , 2010, Applicable Algebra in Engineering, Communication and Computing.

[4]  Jun Chen,et al.  Neural network based modeling and control of elbow joint motion under functional electrical stimulation , 2019, Neurocomputing.

[5]  Arjan van der Schaft,et al.  Non-linear dynamical control systems , 1990 .

[6]  Marcio S. de Queiroz,et al.  Adaptive control of the nonlinearly parameterized limb dynamics with application to neuromuscular electrical stimulation , 2016, 2016 American Control Conference (ACC).

[7]  Mounir Ayadi,et al.  Polynomial controller design based on flatness , 2001, Kybernetika.

[8]  R Riener,et al.  Patient-driven control of FES-supported standing up: a simulation study. , 1998, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[9]  Mounir Ayadi,et al.  Control and trajectory tracking by flatness of a time-variant stator flux motor , 2002, Proceedings of the International Conference on Control Applications.

[10]  M. Fliess,et al.  Flatness and defect of non-linear systems: introductory theory and examples , 1995 .

[11]  Philippe Poignet,et al.  Experimental parameter identification of a multi-scale musculoskeletal model controlled by electrical stimulation: application to patients with spinal cord injury , 2013, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[12]  K. Tong,et al.  Speed-adaptive control of functional electrical stimulation for dropfoot correction , 2018, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[13]  Sunil K. Agrawal,et al.  Differentially Flat Systems , 2004 .

[14]  Katja D. Mombaur,et al.  Nonlinear model predictive control of joint ankle by electrical stimulation for drop foot correction , 2013, 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[15]  R B Stein,et al.  Estimating mechanical parameters of leg segments in individuals with and without physical disabilities. , 1996, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[16]  Thomas Schauer,et al.  Iterative Learning Control and System Identification of the Antagonistic Knee Muscle Complex During Gait Using Functional Electrical Stimulation , 2017 .

[17]  Marcio de Queiroz,et al.  Neural Network-based Control of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation With Input Saturation , 2019 .

[18]  Philippe Poignet,et al.  Synthesis of optimal electrical stimulation patterns for functional motion restoration: applied to spinal cord-injured patients , 2014, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[19]  Philippe Poignet,et al.  Robust control law strategy based on high order sliding mode: towards a muscle control , 2005, 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[20]  R. Murray,et al.  Flat Systems , 1997 .

[21]  Qiang Wang,et al.  Identification-Based Closed-Loop NMES Limb Tracking With Amplitude-Modulated Control Input , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics.

[22]  Zhenyu Yang,et al.  Potential for Real-Time Monitoring and Control of Dissolved Oxygen in the Injection Water Treatment Process , 2018 .

[23]  Philippe Poignet,et al.  Optimal Functional Electrical Stimulation patterns synthesis for knee joint control , 2008, 2008 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[24]  Owen Howlett,et al.  Functional electrical stimulation improves activity after stroke: a systematic review with meta-analysis. , 2015, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[25]  O. Schmitt The heat of shortening and the dynamic constants of muscle , 2017 .

[26]  E Dombre,et al.  Chapter 13 – Trajectory generation , 2002 .

[27]  Warren E. Dixon,et al.  A Non-Linear Control Method to Compensate for Muscle Fatigue during Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation , 2017, Front. Robot. AI.

[28]  Zhan Li,et al.  Real-time estimation of FES-induced joint torque with evoked EMG , 2016, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[29]  Philippe Poignet,et al.  Toward lower limbs movement restoration with input–output feedback linearization and model predictive control through functional electrical stimulation , 2012 .

[30]  Zhan Li,et al.  Real-time closed-loop FES control of muscle activation with evoked EMG feedback , 2015, 2015 7th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER).

[31]  A. Kralj,et al.  Functional Electrical Stimulation: Standing and Walking after Spinal Cord Injury , 1989 .

[32]  A. Huxley Muscle structure and theories of contraction. , 1957, Progress in biophysics and biophysical chemistry.

[33]  Naji A. Alibeji,et al.  Nonlinear Model Predictive Control of Functional Electrical Stimulation , 2015, HRI 2015.

[34]  Nahum Shimkin,et al.  Nonlinear Control Systems , 2008 .

[35]  F. Zajac Muscle and tendon: properties, models, scaling, and application to biomechanics and motor control. , 1989, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[36]  H. Woltring Myocybernetic control models of skeletal muscle—Characteristics and applications , 1983 .

[37]  Mounir Ayadi,et al.  LTV controller flatness-based design for MIMO systems , 2014 .

[38]  Pierre-Brice Wieber,et al.  Multiscale modeling of skeletal muscle properties and experimental validations in isometric conditions , 2011, Biological Cybernetics.