A Framework for Analyzing Online Communities: Sponsor and Member Value Proposition

This paper examines online communities and describes how they can be differentiated from other Internet supported group interactions. A definition of an online community is given and three generic types are identified. These types are defined by the community models based on the value proposition for the sponsors and members. The value proposition for members is strongly influenced by the model, as facilities and opportunities for interaction are structured by the site sponsors. Where online communities offer fulfillment of specific needs, people participate and become members. Additional benefits enhance the value of membership and encourage retention and greater interactivity. Significant benefits are gained from online communities for businesses, NGOs, other community organizations and individuals. Identifying the different types of communities and their characteristics is an important stage in developing greater understanding of how virtual communities can contribute to businesses, healthcare, community needs and a myriad of other contexts. Examples of the three generic types of online communities are included for further edification.

[1]  Michael Borovicka,et al.  Ghost towns or vibrant villages? Constructing business-sponsored online communities , 2006 .

[2]  Antony Bryant,et al.  The Dark Side of Technology: Some Sociotechnical Reflections , 2011, Int. J. Sociotechnology Knowl. Dev..

[3]  Jennifer Rowley,et al.  Relationships and online consumer communities , 2006, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[4]  Johann Füller,et al.  Community based innovation: How to integrate members of virtual communities into new product development , 2006, Electron. Commer. Res..

[5]  Rosemary Stockdale,et al.  Peer-to-peer online communities for people with chronic diseases: a conceptual framework , 2008, J. Syst. Inf. Technol..

[6]  Petra Schubert,et al.  Virtual Communities of Transaction: The Role of Personalization in Electronic Commerce , 2000, Electron. Mark..

[7]  Alan D. Smith,et al.  Exploring online dating and customer relationship management , 2005, Online Inf. Rev..

[8]  Stephanie Watts,et al.  Capitalizing on Content: Information Adoption in Two Online communities , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[9]  M. Y. Keary.  Knowledge Development and Social Change through Technology: Emerging Studies , 2012 .

[10]  Per-Arne Persson.  Technology: From Substance to Abstraction and What This Means for Our Understanding of it , 2012, Int. J. Sociotechnology Knowl. Dev..

[11]  Julita Vassileva,et al.  Design and evaluation of an adaptive incentive mechanism for sustained educational online communities , 2006, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[12]  Peter A. Gloor,et al.  Correlating temporal communication patterns of the Eclipse open source community with performance and creativity , 2007, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[13]  Douglas R. Vogel,et al.  Virtual Community Informatics: A Review and Research Agenda , 2003 .

[14]  N. Ben Fairweather.  Policies for the prevention of repetitive strain injury among computer users: a moral analysis. , 2002 .

[15]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  Managing Risks in Multiple Online Auctions: An Options Approach , 2005, Decis. Sci..

[16]  Noriko Hara,et al.  Knowledge-sharing in an online community of health-care professionals , 2007, Inf. Technol. People.

[17]  Brian S. Butler,et al.  Membership Size, Communication Activity, and Sustainability: A Resource-Based Model of Online Social Structures , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[18]  Alan Poling,et al.  Increasing fiction writers' productivity through an internet-based intervention. , 2006, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[19]  J. Hagel,et al.  The Real Value of Online Communities , 2000 .

[20]  Dina Mayzlin,et al.  Promotional Chat on the Internet , 2006 .

[21]  E. Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: The Organizational Frontier , 2000 .

[22]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Non-public and public online community participation: Needs, attitudes and behavior , 2006, Electron. Commer. Res..

[23]  Urban Nuldén,et al.  Spectator Information Support: Exploring the Context of Distributed Events , 2005 .

[24]  G. A. Hillery,et al.  Villages, Cities, and Total Institutions , 1963 .

[25]  Jan Marco Leimeister,et al.  Do virtual communities matter for the social support of patients?: Antecedents and effects of virtual relationships in online communities , 2008, Inf. Technol. People.

[26]  Bin Gu,et al.  Competition Among Virtual Communities and User Valuation: The Case of Investing-Related Communities , 2007, Inf. Syst. Res..

[27]  R. Kozinets,et al.  The Wisdom of Consumer Crowds , 2008 .

[28]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  The quality of online social relationships , 2002, CACM.

[29]  Kevin S. Rioux,et al.  Examining information exchange and virtual communities: an emergent framework , 2007, Online Inf. Rev..

[30]  David Gefen,et al.  Virtual Community Attraction: Why People Hang Out Online , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[31]  Samer Faraj,et al.  Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice , 2005, MIS Q..

[32]  Terry O'Sullivan,et al.  Sounding boards: performing arts organizations and the Internet forum , 2007 .

[33]  Patricia Radin.  "To me, it's my life": medical communication, trust, and activism in cyberspace. , 2006, Social science & medicine.

[34]  S. Wilson,et al.  The Anthropology of Online Communities , 2002 .

[35]  Andrea Hemetsberger,et al.  Learning and Knowledge-building in Open-source Communities , 2006 .

[36]  Mikael Wiberg,et al.  The Interaction Society: Practice, Theories and Supportive Technologies , 2005 .

[37]  José Paulo Leal,et al.  Integrating the LMS in Service Oriented eLearning Systems , 2011, Int. J. Knowl. Soc. Res..

[38]  Kevin Wise,et al.  Moderation, Response Rate, and Message Interactivity: Features of Online Communities and Their Effects on Intent to Participate , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..