Pedestrian Visibility at Night: Effects of Pedestrian Clothing, Driver Age, and Headlamp Beam Setting

ABSTRACT Reduced visibility is believed to be a major contributor to night-time pedestrian fatalities. In thisstudy, the ability of drivers to recognize the presence of roadside pedestrians was determined andrecognition distances measured using a parallax-based device. Ten young and ten older participants drove atnight around a closed road circuit and pressed a button whenever they recognized a pedestrian. Fourpedestrian clothing conditions were tested (black, white, retroreflective vest and retroreflective material inthe ‘biomotion’ configuration) in both low and high beam conditions. Two pedestrians walked in place onthe shoulder of the road, one in darkness (primary) and one in a high glare position (secondary). Responsedistances were recorded for the primary pedestrian. Overall, drivers identified only 61% of pedestrians inthe presence of glare and 76% in the absence of glare, with only 5% of darkly clad pedestrians beingidentified in the glare condition. Averaged across conditions, the primary pedestrian was identified at 76.5m(251ft), with distances being shortest for darkly clad pedestrians (13m (43ft)), and greatest for the‘biomotion’ pedestrian condition, which improved response distances by up to 50X. The vest conditionfailed to produce similar benefits, despite having an equivalent amount of retroreflective material. Overall,older driver response distances were 58% of those of the younger drivers. These results demonstrate thatwhile all drivers have significant difficulty recognizing pedestrians at night, elderly drivers experience evengreater difficulty. The results also demonstrate the value of clothing configurations that enhance theperception of biological motion.

[1]  J. Hothmer Book reviewInternational archives of photogrammetry and remote sensing: ISPRS, Editor S. Murai: volume 27 part A, Tokyo-Japan-Japan 1989 , 1989 .

[2]  K Rumar,et al.  The basic driver error: late detection. , 1990, Ergonomics.

[3]  R. G. Mortimer Evaluation of meeting beams by field tests and computer simulation. Final report , 1974 .

[4]  Merrill J. Allen,et al.  VISION IN VEHICLES - III , 1991 .

[5]  J. Wood,et al.  Effect of Visual Impairment on Driving , 1994, Human factors.

[6]  David Shinar Actual versus estimated night-time pedestrian visibility , 1984 .

[7]  R A Tyrrell,et al.  The assured clear distance ahead rule: implications for nighttime traffic safety and the law. , 1998, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[8]  M J Allen,et al.  ACTUAL PEDESTRIAN VISIBILITY AND THE PEDESTRIAN'S ESTIMATE OF HIS OWN VISIBILITY* , 1970, American journal of optometry and archives of American Academy of Optometry.

[9]  Susan T. Chrysler,et al.  Age Differences in Visual Abilities in Nighttime Driving Field Conditions , 1996 .

[10]  Kenneth W. Gish,et al.  DRIVER BEHAVIOR AND PERFORMANCE USING AN INFRARED NIGHT VISION ENHANCEMENT SYSTEM , 2002 .

[11]  M. Flannagan,et al.  The role of ambient light level in fatal crashes: inferences from daylight saving time transitions. , 2002, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[12]  Michael Sivak,et al.  Differentiation of Visibility and Alcohol as Contributors to Twilight Road Fatalities , 1996, Hum. Factors.

[13]  J Luoma,et al.  Effects of retroreflector positioning on nighttime recognition of pedestrians. , 1996, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[14]  Mark Ivan Woolf,et al.  Application of parallax for the measurement of visibility distances in the open-road environment , 1998 .

[15]  D. Alfred Owens,et al.  Biological Motion and Nighttime Pedestrian Conspicuity , 1994 .

[16]  David F. Preusser,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVE CONSPICUITY-ENHANCEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR PEDESTRIANS AND BICYCLISTS , 1986 .