Project management: learning by breaking the rules

The paper explores project management in action in a large public research organisation – NLAT which decided to change its internal organisation from team-based to project-based organisation a few years ago. A systematic and comparative analysis of 8 projects reveals that adherence to the ISO 9000’s standardized rules of project management - specific staffing and project leaders, definition of milestones ex ante, procedure manuals, and formalized learning accumulation mechanisms - had little to do with the organisations success over recent years: Looking for explanations for this success, the paper focuses on the process of transferring from one project to another, enhancing organisational learning through rules breaking. We identify three elements which encourage the accumulation of knowledge and competencies, as organisational learning: low project core staffing levels which stimulates the circulation of engineers and researchers between projects and blurs project boundaries, implementing and managing thematic projects which build on specific competencies developed in dedicated projects and encouraging ‘bricolage’ to hybridise project management with traditional hierarchical management practices.

[1]  Christian Zeller,et al.  Project Teams as Means of Restructuring Research and Development in the Pharmaceutical Industry , 2002 .

[2]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  Managing Internal R&D Networks in Global Firms , 2002 .

[3]  S. Newell,et al.  Project-Based Learning and the Role of Learning Boundaries , 2004 .

[4]  R. Grant.  Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[5]  Roger Miller,et al.  Understanding and Managing Risks in Large Engineering Projects , 2001 .

[6]  Christoph H. Loch,et al.  Selectionism and Learning in Projects with Complexity and Unforeseeable Uncertainty , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[7]  Joseph Lampel.  Towards a holistic approach to strategic project management , 2001 .

[8]  Udo Staber,et al.  The Institutional Embeddedness of Project Networks: The Case of Content Production in German Television , 2002 .

[9]  David Stark,et al.  Distributing Intelligence and Organizing Diversity in New-Media Projects , 2002 .

[10]  Juan D. Rogers,et al.  Strategic Management of Government-Sponsored R&D Portfolios , 2001 .

[11]  Jaime Ortega,et al.  Job Rotation as a Learning Mechanism , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[12]  B. Latour.  Science in Action , 1987 .

[13]  G. Hamel.  Competition for competence and interpartner learning within international strategic alliances , 1991 .

[14]  A. Prencipe,et al.  Inter-project learning: processes and outcomes of knowledge codification in project-based firms , 2001 .

[15]  Gernot Grabher.  Cool Projects, Boring Institutions: Temporary Collaboration in Social Context , 2002 .

[16]  D. Bryde.  Project management concepts, methods and application , 2003 .

[17]  C. W. Pettinga.  Research and Development in the Pharmaceutical Industry , 1971 .

[18]  Fredrik Tell,et al.  Managing Product Development Projects: On the Significance of Fountains and Deadlines , 1998 .

[19]  Christoph H. Loch,et al.  Problem - Solving Oscillations in Complex Engineering Projects , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[20]  Oliver Ibert.  Projects and firms as discordant complements: organisational learning in the Munich software ecology , 2004 .

[21]  Mitsuru Kodama,et al.  Project-based Organizations , 2007 .

[22]  C. Hardy,et al.  Institutional effects of interorganizational collaboration: The emergence of proto-institutions , 2002 .

[23]  Peter Newmark,et al.  Editorial , 1994, Current Biology.

[24]  R. Defillippi,et al.  Project-Based Organizations, Embeddedness and Repositories of Knowledge: Editorial , 2004 .