Adaptive tracking control for real-time hybrid simulation of structures subjected to seismic loading
暂无分享,去创建一个
Mariantonieta Gutierrez Soto | Alejandro Palacio-Betancur | M. Gutierrez Soto | Alejandro Palacio-Betancur
[1] Xiuyu Gao,et al. Development of a robust framework for real-time hybrid simulation: From dynamical system, motion control to experimental error verification , 2012 .
[2] James M. Ricles,et al. Adaptive time series compensator for delay compensation of servo‐hydraulic actuator systems for real‐time hybrid simulation , 2013 .
[3] James M. Ricles,et al. Tracking Error-Based Servohydraulic Actuator Adaptive Compensation for Real-Time Hybrid Simulation , 2010 .
[4] Andrei M. Reinhorn,et al. Compensation of actuator delay and dynamics for real‐time hybrid structural simulation , 2008 .
[5] Richard Christenson,et al. Large-Scale Experimental Verification of Semiactive Control through Real-Time Hybrid Simulation , 2008 .
[6] James M. Ricles,et al. Large-Scale Experimental Studies of Structural Control Algorithms for Structures with Magnetorheological Dampers Using Real-Time Hybrid Simulation , 2013 .
[7] Kiyoshi Kanai,et al. Semi-empirical Formula for the Seismic Characteristics of the Ground , 1957 .
[8] Bin Wu,et al. Robust integrated actuator control: experimental verification and real‐time hybrid‐simulation implementation , 2015 .
[9] Masayoshi Nakashima,et al. Development of real‐time pseudo dynamic testing , 1992 .
[10] Chunxiang Li,et al. GROUND MOTION DOMINANT FREQUENCY EFFECT ON THE DESIGN OF MULTIPLE TUNED MASS DAMPERS , 2004 .
[11] Shirley J. Dyke,et al. Role of Control-Structure Interaction in Protective System Design , 1995 .
[12] Motohiko Hakuno,et al. DYNAMIC DESTRUCTIVE TEST OF A CANTILEVER BEAM, CONTROLLED BY AN ANALOG-COMPUTER , 1969 .
[13] Colin A. Taylor,et al. Adaptive Control Strategy for Dynamic Substructuring Tests , 2007 .
[14] James M. Ricles,et al. Large‐scale real‐time hybrid simulation involving multiple experimental substructures and adaptive actuator delay compensation , 2012 .
[15] Bin Wu,et al. Actuator dynamics compensation based on upper bound delay for real‐time hybrid simulation , 2013 .
[16] M.I. Wallace,et al. An adaptive polynomial based forward prediction algorithm for multi-actuator real-time dynamic substructuring , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.
[17] James M. Ricles,et al. Experimental Studies on Real-Time Testing of Structures with Elastomeric Dampers , 2009 .
[18] Chia-Ming Chang,et al. Adaptive model-based tracking control for real-time hybrid simulation , 2014, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.
[19] Yozo Fujino,et al. Optimal tuned mass damper for seismic applications and practical design formulas , 2008 .
[20] Arun Prakash,et al. Establishing a predictive performance indicator for real‐time hybrid simulation , 2014 .
[21] Martin S. Williams,et al. Real‐time hybrid experiments with Newmark integration, MCSmd outer‐loop control and multi‐tasking strategies , 2007 .
[22] Jian Zhao,et al. Considerations for the development of real-time dynamic testing using servo-hydraulic actuation , 2003 .
[23] Martin S. Williams,et al. Stability and Delay Compensation for Real-Time Substructure Testing , 2002 .
[24] Toshihiko Horiuchi,et al. A new method for compensating actuator delay in real–time hybrid experiments , 2001, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.
[25] Billie F. Spencer,et al. Model-Based Feedforward-Feedback Actuator Control for Real-Time Hybrid Simulation , 2013 .
[26] P. Benson Shing,et al. Performance evaluation of a real‐time pseudodynamic test system , 2006 .
[27] James M. Ricles,et al. Improving the inverse compensation method for real‐time hybrid simulation through a dual compensation scheme , 2009 .
[28] Arun Prakash,et al. Predictive stability indicator: a novel approach to configuring a real‐time hybrid simulation , 2017 .
[29] Arun Prakash,et al. Establishing a stability switch criterion for effective implementation of real-time hybrid simulation , 2014 .
[30] Y. Namita,et al. Real‐time hybrid experimental system with actuator delay compensation and its application to a piping system with energy absorber , 1999 .
[31] Pei-Yang Lin,et al. Real‐time hybrid testing of a smart base isolation system , 2014 .
[32] Shirley J. Dyke,et al. Servo-hydraulic actuator in controllable canonical form: Identification and experimental validation , 2018 .
[33] Improved Adaptive Inverse Compensation Technique for Real-Time Hybrid Simulation , 2012 .
[34] Yunbyeong Chae,et al. Real‐time force control for servo‐hydraulic actuator systems using adaptive time series compensator and compliance springs , 2018 .
[35] Genda Chen,et al. OPTIMAL PLACEMENT OF MULTIPLE TUNED MASS DAMPERS FOR SEISMIC STRUCTURES , 2001 .
[36] Martin S. Williams,et al. Evaluation of numerical time‐integration schemes for real‐time hybrid testing , 2008 .
[37] Xiuyu Gao,et al. Real time hybrid simulation: from dynamic system, motion control to experimental error , 2013 .
[38] Hojjat Adeli,et al. Multi-agent replicator controller for sustainable vibration control of smart structures , 2017 .