Adaptive tracking control for real-time hybrid simulation of structures subjected to seismic loading

Abstract Real-time hybrid simulation (RTHS) is an interesting method for studying the performance of structures subjected to dynamic loading. RTHS decomposes a structure into partitioned physical and numerical sub-structures that are coupled together through actuation systems. The sub-structuring approach is particularly attractive for studying large-scale problems since it allows for setting up large-scale structures with thousands of degrees of freedom in numerical simulations while specific components can be studied experimentally. Due to the RTHS system dynamics, there is an inevitable time delay that affects accuracy and stability of the simulation. Several tracking control algorithms have been proposed to compensate time delay and improve the accuracy, however, robustness still presents challenges to obtain successful simulation results. In this paper, a Conditional Adaptive Time Series (CATS) compensator is proposed based on the principles of the Adaptive Time Series compensator (ATS) for a benchmark problem that consists of a three-story shear frame with one degree of freedom (DOF) in a virtual RTHS (vRTHS) that considers numerical and experimental models subjected to earthquake loading. A recursive least square (RLS) algorithm is adopted for the parameter estimation of the controller to reduce computational efforts in the simulation. The performance and robustness of a first-order CATS controller is evaluated for different partitioned cases. It is shown that an adaptive compensation strategy is an effective approach for RTHS based on nine performance criteria due to its simple implementation and accuracy.

[1]  Xiuyu Gao,et al.  Development of a robust framework for real-time hybrid simulation: From dynamical system, motion control to experimental error verification , 2012 .

[2]  James M. Ricles,et al.  Adaptive time series compensator for delay compensation of servo‐hydraulic actuator systems for real‐time hybrid simulation , 2013 .

[3]  James M. Ricles,et al.  Tracking Error-Based Servohydraulic Actuator Adaptive Compensation for Real-Time Hybrid Simulation , 2010 .

[4]  Andrei M. Reinhorn,et al.  Compensation of actuator delay and dynamics for real‐time hybrid structural simulation , 2008 .

[5]  Richard Christenson,et al.  Large-Scale Experimental Verification of Semiactive Control through Real-Time Hybrid Simulation , 2008 .

[6]  James M. Ricles,et al.  Large-Scale Experimental Studies of Structural Control Algorithms for Structures with Magnetorheological Dampers Using Real-Time Hybrid Simulation , 2013 .

[7]  Kiyoshi Kanai,et al.  Semi-empirical Formula for the Seismic Characteristics of the Ground , 1957 .

[8]  Bin Wu,et al.  Robust integrated actuator control: experimental verification and real‐time hybrid‐simulation implementation , 2015 .

[9]  Masayoshi Nakashima,et al.  Development of real‐time pseudo dynamic testing , 1992 .

[10]  Chunxiang Li,et al.  GROUND MOTION DOMINANT FREQUENCY EFFECT ON THE DESIGN OF MULTIPLE TUNED MASS DAMPERS , 2004 .

[11]  Shirley J. Dyke,et al.  Role of Control-Structure Interaction in Protective System Design , 1995 .

[12]  Motohiko Hakuno,et al.  DYNAMIC DESTRUCTIVE TEST OF A CANTILEVER BEAM, CONTROLLED BY AN ANALOG-COMPUTER , 1969 .

[13]  Colin A. Taylor,et al.  Adaptive Control Strategy for Dynamic Substructuring Tests , 2007 .

[14]  James M. Ricles,et al.  Large‐scale real‐time hybrid simulation involving multiple experimental substructures and adaptive actuator delay compensation , 2012 .

[15]  Bin Wu,et al.  Actuator dynamics compensation based on upper bound delay for real‐time hybrid simulation , 2013 .

[16]  M.I. Wallace,et al.  An adaptive polynomial based forward prediction algorithm for multi-actuator real-time dynamic substructuring , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[17]  James M. Ricles,et al.  Experimental Studies on Real-Time Testing of Structures with Elastomeric Dampers , 2009 .

[18]  Chia-Ming Chang,et al.  Adaptive model-based tracking control for real-time hybrid simulation , 2014, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[19]  Yozo Fujino,et al.  Optimal tuned mass damper for seismic applications and practical design formulas , 2008 .

[20]  Arun Prakash,et al.  Establishing a predictive performance indicator for real‐time hybrid simulation , 2014 .

[21]  Martin S. Williams,et al.  Real‐time hybrid experiments with Newmark integration, MCSmd outer‐loop control and multi‐tasking strategies , 2007 .

[22]  Jian Zhao,et al.  Considerations for the development of real-time dynamic testing using servo-hydraulic actuation , 2003 .

[23]  Martin S. Williams,et al.  Stability and Delay Compensation for Real-Time Substructure Testing , 2002 .

[24]  Toshihiko Horiuchi,et al.  A new method for compensating actuator delay in real–time hybrid experiments , 2001, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[25]  Billie F. Spencer,et al.  Model-Based Feedforward-Feedback Actuator Control for Real-Time Hybrid Simulation , 2013 .

[26]  P. Benson Shing,et al.  Performance evaluation of a real‐time pseudodynamic test system , 2006 .

[27]  James M. Ricles,et al.  Improving the inverse compensation method for real‐time hybrid simulation through a dual compensation scheme , 2009 .

[28]  Arun Prakash,et al.  Predictive stability indicator: a novel approach to configuring a real‐time hybrid simulation , 2017 .

[29]  Arun Prakash,et al.  Establishing a stability switch criterion for effective implementation of real-time hybrid simulation , 2014 .

[30]  Y. Namita,et al.  Real‐time hybrid experimental system with actuator delay compensation and its application to a piping system with energy absorber , 1999 .

[31]  Pei-Yang Lin,et al.  Real‐time hybrid testing of a smart base isolation system , 2014 .

[32]  Shirley J. Dyke,et al.  Servo-hydraulic actuator in controllable canonical form: Identification and experimental validation , 2018 .

[33]  Improved Adaptive Inverse Compensation Technique for Real-Time Hybrid Simulation , 2012 .

[34]  Yunbyeong Chae,et al.  Real‐time force control for servo‐hydraulic actuator systems using adaptive time series compensator and compliance springs , 2018 .

[35]  Genda Chen,et al.  OPTIMAL PLACEMENT OF MULTIPLE TUNED MASS DAMPERS FOR SEISMIC STRUCTURES , 2001 .

[36]  Martin S. Williams,et al.  Evaluation of numerical time‐integration schemes for real‐time hybrid testing , 2008 .

[37]  Xiuyu Gao,et al.  Real time hybrid simulation: from dynamic system, motion control to experimental error , 2013 .

[38]  Hojjat Adeli,et al.  Multi-agent replicator controller for sustainable vibration control of smart structures , 2017 .