Vulnerability analysis in environmental management: widening and deepening its approach

Current threshold-dominated methodologies of vulnerability analysis do not give sufficient emphasis to the processes that shape the environment and define the behaviour of environmental systems. While there has been widespread recognition for developing comprehensive approaches to assessing vulnerability, there has been relatively little theoretical debate on limitations and opportunities for improving the application of vulnerability analysis to environmental management, particularly in terms of a more complex systems perspective. A functional-based approach to ‘vulnerability’ is a means whereby the dynamics of vulnerable systems could be more fully integrated within vulnerability analysis. Functionality is seen as the ability of the environment to deliver outputs through time. Vulnerability analysis that is focused not only on thresholds that define the limits of system behaviour, but also on the process-defined capacity of systems to maintain this behaviour and deliver those outputs, could emerge as a useful element in integrated environmental management. Linking threshold analysis with a clear understanding of the interactions, differences and similarities between system processes which define coping ranges and system performance is a relatively simple conceptual development in vulnerability analysis. Such a development could, if successful, be of great value to those managing complex environments.

[1]  L. D. Wright,et al.  Coastal depositional landforms , 1977 .

[2]  Anthony Patt,et al.  Taking the uncertainty in climate-change vulnerability assessment seriously , 2005 .

[3]  F. Clements Scientific Books: Plant Succession. An Analysis of the Development of Vegetation , 2009 .

[4]  R. Kasperson,et al.  A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  Richard J. T. Klein,et al.  Climate change, adaptive capacity and development , 2003 .

[6]  C. S. Holling,et al.  Panarchy Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems , 2002 .

[7]  W. Cramer,et al.  Vulnerability assessment - analysing the human-environment system in the face of global environmental change , 2004 .

[8]  K. Burgess,et al.  Futurecoast: Predicting the future coastal evolution of England and Wales , 2004 .

[9]  N. Gotts Resilience, Panarchy, and World-Systems Analysis , 2007 .

[10]  A. Pascu Operational research '81: J.P. Brans (Ed.) Proceedings of the Ninth IFORS International Conference on Operational Research, Hamburg, Germany, July 20–24, 1981, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1981, xx + 984 pages, Dfl.250.000 , 1982 .

[11]  Jim W. Hall,et al.  Flood risk management in Europe : innovation in policy and practice , 2007 .

[12]  C. Folke,et al.  Navigating social–ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change: Fikret Berkes, Johan Colding and Carl Folke (Eds.). Cambridge University Press, 2003. xxi + 393 pages. ISBN 0-521-81592-4 (hardback), £65 , 2004 .

[13]  A. Wayne Wymore,et al.  Systems engineering methodology for interdisciplinary teams , 1976 .

[14]  K. Boulding General Systems Theory---The Skeleton of Science , 1956 .

[15]  E. Ostrom,et al.  The globalization of socio-ecological systems: An agenda for scientific research , 2006 .

[16]  Monica G. Turner,et al.  Ecological Thresholds: The Key to Successful Environmental Management or an Important Concept with No Practical Application? , 2006, Ecosystems.

[17]  Maurice L. Schwartz,et al.  Encyclopedia of coastal science , 2005 .

[18]  J. Norberg,et al.  ADAPTIVE GOVERNANCE OF SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS , 2005 .

[19]  Howard T. Odum,et al.  Systems ecology : an introduction , 1984 .

[20]  Norbert Wiener,et al.  The human use of human beings - cybernetics and society , 1988 .

[21]  B. Walker,et al.  Thresholds in Ecological and Social–Ecological Systems: a Developing Database , 2004 .

[22]  C. Holling Simplifying the complex: The paradigms of ecological function and structure , 1987 .

[23]  Dagmar Schröter,et al.  Towards a spatially explicit and quantitative vulnerability assessment of environmental change in Europe , 2006 .

[24]  C. S. Holling,et al.  Resilience, Adaptability and Transformability in Social–ecological Systems , 2004 .

[25]  Coleen Vogel,et al.  Vulnerability and global environmental change : rhetoric and reality , 2004 .

[26]  L. McFadden Governing Coastal Spaces: The Case of Disappearing Science in Integrated Coastal Zone Management , 2007 .

[27]  Colin Polsky,et al.  Assessing vulnerabilities to the effects of global change: an eight step approach , 2005 .

[28]  Loraine McFadden,et al.  Defining 'vulnerability': conflicts, complexities and implications for coastal zone management , 2007 .

[29]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Social-Ecological Resilience to Coastal Disasters , 2005, Science.

[30]  Gary Yohe,et al.  moving toward a working definition of adaptive capacity , 2002 .

[31]  S. Schumm,et al.  Time, space, and causality in geomorphology , 1965 .

[32]  W. Davies The conceptual revolution in geography , 1972 .

[33]  Barbara A. Kennedy,et al.  Physical geography: A systems approach , 1971 .

[34]  E. Evans,et al.  Foresight : future flooding : scientific summary : volume II : managing future risks , 2004 .

[35]  Stephen Alfred Forbes,et al.  The Lake as a Microcosm , 1925 .

[36]  E. N. Buckley,et al.  Technological options for adaptation to climate change in coastal zones , 2001 .

[37]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Systems Thinking, Systems Practice , 1981 .