Optimized geometry of the carotid artery cross-section: Comparison between circular and elliptical approximations in B-mode ultrasound images

Cross-sectional area (CSA) measurement obtained from transverse ultrasound images is the general method used for carotid artery stenosis calculation which assumes a circular CS, however, atherosclerotic stenosis may change the CSA geometry and lead to miscalculation. This study aims to determine the accuracy of circular or elliptical approximation of the normal and stenosed carotid artery CSA. Sixty transverse B-mode ultrasound images (30 from healthy and 30 from stenosed carotid arteries) were recorded. Contours of the internal lumen of the arteries were segmented and the encompassed lumen area was calculated. Based on the fitting accuracy and computational cost effectiveness, pattern search (PS) optimization algorithm was selected by which the parameterized equations of the circular and elliptical geometries were fitted to the segmented point clouds. Goodness of fit analysis of two geometries was carried out using root mean square error (RMSE) and the relative deviation of the approximated CSA. Results of this study showed that elliptical approximation better fits to the artery CS of carotid arteries, with the average RMSE of [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] pixels in healthy and [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] pixels in stenosed carotid arteries, respectively, for circle and ellipse approximation. Mean values of the relative deviation of the approximated CSA by circle and ellipse geometries were 5.14%[Formula: see text]±[Formula: see text]4.53% and 3.89%[Formula: see text]±[Formula: see text]4.19% in normal arteries; and 12.18%[Formula: see text]±[Formula: see text]10.94% and 4.59%[Formula: see text]±[Formula: see text]3.75% in stenosed arteries, respectively. This study represented that elliptical approximation provides increased accuracy for carotid artery CSA for both normal and stenosed carotid arteries.

[1]  A. Kamenskiy,et al.  Three-dimensional geometry of the human carotid artery. , 2012, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[2]  Charles Audet,et al.  Analysis of Generalized Pattern Searches , 2000, SIAM J. Optim..

[3]  K. Kara,et al.  Cross-sectional area measurement of the coronary arteries using CT angiography at the level of the bifurcation: is there a relationship? , 2015, Diagnostic and interventional radiology.

[4]  Doran S. Mix,et al.  Cross-sectional area for the calculation of carotid artery stenosis on computed tomographic angiography. , 2013, Journal of vascular surgery.

[5]  T. Miyati,et al.  [Assessment of cross-sectional area and diameter of carotid artery using time-of-flight MR angiography and CT angiography]. , 2011, Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi.

[6]  Kristina Samaržija,et al.  Grading of carotid artery stenosis with computed tomography angiography: whether to use the narrowest diameter or the cross-sectional area , 2018, Insights into Imaging.

[7]  Chietsugu Katoh,et al.  Accurate quantitative measurements of brachial artery cross-sectional vascular area and vascular volume elastic modulus using automated oscillometric measurements: comparison with brachial artery ultrasound , 2015, Hypertension Research.

[8]  George D. Stetten,et al.  Fully Automated Common Carotid Artery and Internal Jugular Vein Identification and Tracking Using B-Mode Ultrasound , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  Graham M. Treece,et al.  Engineering a freehand 3D ultrasound system , 2003, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[10]  Patrick J Drew,et al.  Determination of Vessel Cross-Sectional Area by Thresholding in Radon Space , 2014, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[11]  Shing-Hong Liu,et al.  Automatic detection of the carotid artery boundary on cross-sectional MR image sequences using a circle model guided dynamic programming , 2011, Biomedical engineering online.

[12]  Constantinos S. Pattichis,et al.  Ultrasound and carotid bifurcation atherosclerosis , 2012 .

[13]  Stephane Cotin,et al.  Segmentation and reconstruction of vascular structures for 3D real-time simulation , 2011, Medical Image Anal..

[14]  Martin Zukal,et al.  Analysis of Carotid Artery Transverse Sections in Long Ultrasound Video Sequences. , 2018, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[15]  Daniel F Leotta,et al.  Standardized ultrasound evaluation of carotid stenosis for clinical trials: University of Washington Ultrasound Reading Center , 2010, Cardiovascular ultrasound.

[16]  J. van Prehn,et al.  Multidimensional characterization of carotid artery stenosis using CT imaging: a comparison with ultrasound grading and peak flow measurement. , 2008, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[17]  R. Zivadinov,et al.  Lower Arterial Cross-Sectional Area of Carotid and Vertebral Arteries and Higher Frequency of Secondary Neck Vessels Are Associated with Multiple Sclerosis , 2018, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[18]  Andrew W. Fitzgibbon,et al.  Direct Least Square Fitting of Ellipses , 1999, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[19]  N. Tamaki,et al.  Anatomical and Functional Estimations of Brachial Artery Diameter and Elasticity Using Oscillometric Measurements with a Quantitative Approach , 2016, Pulse.

[20]  P. Cooperberg,et al.  Sonographic examination of the carotid arteries. , 2005, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[21]  S. Wilson,et al.  Helical CT angiography in the preoperative evaluation of carotid artery stenosis. , 1998, Journal of vascular surgery.