This research examines the recognition of two-syllable spoken words and the means by which the auditory word recognition process deals with ambiguous stimulus information. The experiments reported here investigate the influence of individual syllables within two-syllable words on the recognition of each other. Specifically, perceptual identification of two-syllable words comprised of two monosyllabic words (spondees) was examined. Individual syllables within a spondee were characterized as either "easy" or "hard" depending on the syllable's neighborhood characteristics; an easy syllable was defined as a high-frequency word in a sparse neighborhood of low-frequency words, and a hard syllable as a low-frequency word in a high-density, high-frequency neighborhood. In Experiment 1, stimuli were created by splicing together recordings of the component syllables of the spondee, thus equating for syllable stress. Additional experiments tested the perceptual identification of naturally produced spondees, spliced nonwords, and monosyllables alone. Neighborhood structure had a strong effect on identification in all experiments. In addition, identification performance for spondees with a hard-easy syllable pattern was higher than for spondees with an easy-hard syllable pattern, indicating a primarily retroactive pattern of influence in spoken word recognition. Results strongly suggest that word recognition involves multiple activation and delayed commitment, thus ensuring accurate and efficient recognition.
[1]
Anne Cutler,et al.
The role of strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access
,
1988
.
[2]
W. Marslen-Wilson.
Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition
,
1987,
Cognition.
[3]
J. Gee,et al.
Prosodic structure and spoken word recognition
,
1987,
Cognition.
[4]
Paul A. Luce,et al.
Neighborhoods of Words in the Mental Lexicon. Research on Speech Perception. Technical Report No. 6.
,
1986
.
[5]
F. Grosjean.
The recognition of words after their acoustic offset: Evidence and implications
,
1985,
Perception & psychophysics.
[6]
H. Nusbaum.
Sizing up the Hoosier Mental Lexicon: Measuring the Familiarity of 20,000 Words, Research on Speech Perception
,
1984
.
[7]
R. Glushko.
The Organization and Activation of Orthographic Knowledge in Reading Aloud.
,
1979
.
[8]
William D Marslen-Wilson,et al.
Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech
,
1978,
Cognitive Psychology.
[9]
H. Kucera,et al.
Computational analysis of present-day American English
,
1967
.
[10]
R. Duncan Luce,et al.
Individual Choice Behavior
,
1959
.