Efficacy of Plantar Loading Parameters During Gait in Terms of Reliability, Variability, Effect of Gender and Relationship Between Contact Area and Plantar Pressure

Background: The purpose of this study was to determine plantar pressure and contact areas of the foot inside the athletic shoe during activity. The objectives were to determine if plantar pressure and contact area measurements collected on multiple trials from the same subject were reliable, to determine the variability of measurements between subjects as compared to that found between steps within a single subject, to determine the relationship between contact area and plantar pressure, and to ascertain whether there were any systematic gender differences in these measurements. Methods: Sixteen healthy adults volunteered for participation in the first part of the study that was designed to determine reliability and variability of the testing methodology. A separate group of fifty healthy high school and collegiate athletes participating in soccer, field hockey, basketball, and lacrosse comprised the second part of the study that was designed to investigate gender differences in terms of normalized midfoot plantar pressure and contact area, and the interrelationship between the two measurements. Data were collected during the midstance phase of gait, using the Pedar inshoe measurement system (Novel GMBH, St. Paul, MN). Athletes wore their own athletic shoes and performed walking trials on a surface similar to that used in their sport. The foot was divided into four regions based on radiographic measurements. Results: The midfoot region demonstrated excellent reliability across multiple trials of the same subject in contact area and plantar pressure, and the variability between steps within a single subject was small when compared to that between subjects. Normalized midfoot contact area and plantar pressure values were highly correlated with r values of 0.862 on the left foot and. 912 on the right foot. No significant differences were found in normalized midfoot contact area or plantar pressure values between males and females. Conclusions: The Pedar in-shoe pressure measurement system can be used reliably to quantify contact area and plantar pressure beneath the midfoot region during the midstance phase of gait. This measurement technique can now be used in risk factor studies designed to identify individuals at risk for injury to the foot, ankle, and other lower extremity structures.

[1]  A. Watson Ankle sprains in players of the field-games Gaelic football and hurling. , 1999, The Journal of sports medicine and physical fitness.

[2]  T P Schmalzried,et al.  Injuries in Runners: A Prospective Study of Alignment , 1998, Clinical journal of sport medicine : official journal of the Canadian Academy of Sport Medicine.

[3]  W. Chu,et al.  The use of arch index to characterize arch height: a digital image processing approach , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  D. Ilstrup,et al.  Radiographic Measurements of the Normal Adult Foot , 1980, Foot & ankle.

[5]  J. Hamill,et al.  Arch structure and injury patterns in runners. , 2001, Clinical biomechanics.

[6]  James Barrett,et al.  High- versus low-top shoes for the prevention of ankle sprains in basketball players , 1993, The American journal of sports medicine.

[7]  A. Delitto,et al.  Visual assessment of foot type and relationship of foot type to lower extremity injury. , 1991, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[8]  K. Kaufman,et al.  The Effect of Foot Structure and Range of Motion on Musculoskeletal Overuse Injuries , 1999, The American journal of sports medicine.

[9]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  The arch index: a useful measure from footprints. , 1987, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  A H Franco,et al.  Pes cavus and pes planus. Analyses and treatment. , 1987, Physical therapy.

[11]  B. MacWilliams,et al.  The foot in Marfan syndrome: clinical findings and weight-distribution patterns. , 1998, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[12]  C. Milgrom,et al.  Stress fractures and tibial bone width. A risk factor. , 1987, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[13]  B. Jones,et al.  Foot morphologic characteristics and risk of exercise-related injury. , 1993, Archives of family medicine.

[14]  E M Hennig,et al.  Pressure Distribution Patterns under the Feet of Children in Comparison with Adults , 1991, Foot & ankle.

[15]  Benno M. Nigg,et al.  Footprint Parameters as a Measure of Arch Height , 1992, Foot & ankle.

[16]  Thomas G. McPoil,et al.  A comparison of two in-shoe plantar pressupe measurement systems , 1995 .

[17]  Thomas W Kernozek,et al.  Reliability and Running Speed Effects of In-shoe Loading Measurements During Slow Treadmill Running , 2000, Foot & ankle international.

[18]  S C Wearing,et al.  A comparison of footprint indexes calculated from ink and electronic footprints. , 2001, Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association.

[19]  J. Michelson,et al.  The Injury Risk Associated with Pes Planus in Athletes , 2002, Foot & ankle international.

[20]  A. Randolph,et al.  Reliability of measurements of pressures applied on the foot during walking by a computerized insole sensor system. , 2000, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[21]  T. Kernozek,et al.  Reliability of an In-Shoe Pressure Measurement System During Treadmill Walking , 1996, Foot & ankle international.

[22]  J. Fleiss The design and analysis of clinical experiments , 1987 .

[23]  W. Mechelen,et al.  Physical Characteristics as Risk Factors for Sports Injuries: A Four Year Prospective Study , 1997, International journal of sports medicine.

[24]  L. Staheli,et al.  Arch Height and Lower Limb Pain: An Adult Civilian Study , 2002, Foot & ankle international.

[25]  J F Baumhauer,et al.  Ankle ligament injury risk factors: a prospective study of college athletes , 2001, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.