The Cochlear Implant Controversy: Lessons Learned for Using Anticipatory Governance to Address Societal Concerns of Nano-scale Neural Interface Technologies

A shortcoming of public policy, according to Jeffery Greene (2005), is that it tends to be reactive and not proactive. That is to say, public policies tend towards addressing looming and existent public problems rather than preventing or foreseeing and circumventing future public problems. While the “reactive” nature of public policy might be contested in some scholarly or professional circles it is safe to say that the prevailing public policy making structures in modern democracies are often more inclined to respond to public problems rather than attempt to anticipate, circumvent, or prevent them.

[1]  P. Ladd,et al.  Understanding Deaf Culture: In Search of Deafhood , 2003 .

[2]  R. Bentler,et al.  Measuring cochlear implant satisfaction in postlingually deafened adults with the SADL inventory. , 2008, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[3]  D. Guston Toward Anticipatory Governance , 2007 .

[4]  Jan Kiefer,et al.  Development and Evaluation of an Improved Cochlear Implant Electrode Design for Electric Acoustic Stimulation , 2004, The Laryngoscope.

[5]  Mihail C. Roco,et al.  Societal implications of nanoscience and nanotechnology: Maximizing human benefit , 2005 .

[6]  H. Lane,et al.  Ethical Issues in Cochlear Implant Surgery: An Exploration into Disease, Disability, and the Best Interests of the Child , 1997, Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal.

[7]  F. Schauer Neuroscience, lie-detection, and the law Contrary to the prevailing view, the suitability of brain-based lie-detection for courtroom or forensic use should be determined according to legal and not scientific standards , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[8]  D. Guston,et al.  Anticipating the ethical and political challenges of human nanotechnologies , 2007 .

[9]  J. Greene Public Administration in the New Century: A Concise Introduction , 2004 .

[10]  Kristen N. Carey Wrongful life and wrongful birth: legal aspects of failed genetic testing in oocyte donation. , 2005, Penn bioethics journal.

[11]  A. Stiggelbout,et al.  Cochlear Implant Outcomes and Quality of Life in Adults with Prelingual Deafness , 2007, The Laryngoscope.

[12]  M. Ridgely,et al.  Payment under public and private insurance and access to cochlear implants. , 2002, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.

[13]  David H. Guston,et al.  Innovation policy: not just a jumbo shrimp , 2008, Nature.

[14]  F. Zeng Trends in Cochlear Implants , 2004, Trends in amplification.

[15]  D. Brackmann The cochlear implant: Basic principles , 1976, The Laryngoscope.

[16]  W. Bainbridge,et al.  Societal implications of nanoscience and nanotechnology , 2001 .

[17]  Raghu Garud,et al.  A Socio-Cognitive Model of Technology Evolution: The Case of Cochlear Implants , 2015 .