Quantification of regional myocardial perfusion using semiautomated translation-free analysis of contrast-enhanced power modulation images.

Quantitative analysis of myocardial perfusion is currently based on manual tracing and frame-by-frame realignment of regions of interest. We developed a technique for semiautomated identification of myocardial regions from power modulation images as a potential tool for quantification of myocardial contrast enhancement. This approach was tested in 13 anesthetized pigs during continuous intravenous infusion of contrast at baseline, left anterior descending coronary artery occlusion, and reperfusion. Regional pixel intensity was calculated for each consecutive end-systolic frame after a high-energy ultrasound impulse, and fitted with an exponential function. Perfusion defects caused by occlusion of left anterior descending coronary artery were confirmed by a significant decrease in both postimpulse steady-state intensity and the initial rate of contrast replenishment (P <.05), which were reversed with reperfusion. Automated measurements of myocardial intensity correlated highly with conventional manual tracing (r = 0.90 to 0.97), and resulted in improved signal-to-noise ratios. This technique allows translation-free quantification of regional myocardial perfusion, without the need for manual tracing.

[1]  S Akselrod,et al.  Contrast echocardiographic quantification of regional myocardial perfusion: validation with an isolated rabbit heart model. , 1996, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[2]  A R Jayaweera,et al.  Quantification of myocardial blood flow with ultrasound-induced destruction of microbubbles administered as a constant venous infusion. , 1998, Circulation.

[3]  S. Kaul,et al.  Detection of coronary stenoses and quantification of the degree and spatial extent of blood flow mismatch during coronary hyperemia with myocardial contrast echocardiography. , 1995, Circulation.

[4]  Rolf Adams,et al.  Seeded Region Growing , 1994, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[5]  S. Feinstein Myocardial perfusion: contrast echocardiography perspectives. , 1992, The American journal of cardiology.

[6]  S. Kaul Contrast echocardiography and myocardial perfusion , 1991, Clinical cardiology.

[7]  J. V. Nixon,et al.  Myocardial contrast echocardiography for the assessment of coronary blood flow reserve: validation in humans. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  S. Feinstein,et al.  Pitfalls in quantitative contrast echocardiography: the steps to quantitation of perfusion. , 1993, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[9]  E. Caiani,et al.  Objective assessment of left ventricular wall motion from contrast-enhanced power modulation images. , 2002, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[10]  R. Levine,et al.  Myocardial perfusion and wall motion in infarction border zone: assessment by myocardial contrast echocardiography. , 2000, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[11]  J. Murgo,et al.  Myocardial contrast echocardiography in human beings: correlation of resting perfusion defects to sestamibi single photon emission computed tomography. , 1996, American heart journal.

[12]  A. DeMaria,et al.  Quantitative assessment of myocardial perfusion during graded coronary stenosis by real-time myocardial contrast echo refilling curves. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  A R Jayaweera,et al.  Assessment of transmural distribution of myocardial perfusion with contrast echocardiography. , 1998, Circulation.

[14]  R M Lang,et al.  Combined Assessment of Myocardial Perfusion and Regional Left Ventricular Function by Analysis of Contrast-Enhanced Power Modulation Images , 2001, Circulation.

[15]  O. Kamp,et al.  Accuracy and feasibility of contrast echocardiography for detection of perfusion defects in routine practice: comparison with wall motion and technetium-99m sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography. The Nycomed NC100100 Investigators. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  P. Nihoyannopoulos,et al.  Comparison of myocardial contrast echocardiography with NC100100 and 99mTc sestamibi SPECT for detection of resting myocardial perfusion abnormalities in patients with previous myocardial infarction , 2000, Heart.

[17]  Sanjiv Kaul,et al.  Quantification of Myocardial Perfusion With Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography During Left Atrial Injection of Contrast: Implications for Venous Injection , 1994, Circulation.

[18]  M. Quiñones,et al.  Myocardial contrast echocardiography: relation of collateral perfusion to extent of injury and severity of contractile dysfunction in a canine model of coronary thrombosis and reperfusion. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  R. Kerber,et al.  Quantitation of myocardial perfusion by contrast echocardiography: analysis of contrast gray level appearance variables and intracyclic variability. , 1989, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[20]  B. Vandenberg,et al.  Myocardial Perfusion and Contrast Echocardiography: Review and New Perspectives , 1991, Echocardiography.