Comparison of a Modal Method and a Proper Orthogonal Decomposition approach for multi-group time-dependent reactor spatial kinetics

Abstract In this paper, two modelling approaches based on a Modal Method (MM) and on the Proper Orthogonal Decomposition (POD) technique, for developing a control-oriented model of nuclear reactor spatial kinetics, are presented and compared. Both these methods allow developing neutronics description by means of a set of ordinary differential equations. The comparison of the outcomes provided by the two approaches focuses on the capability of evaluating the reactivity and the neutron flux shape in different reactor configurations, with reference to a TRIGA Mark II reactor. The results given by the POD-based approach are higher-fidelity with respect to the reference solution than those computed according to the MM-based approach, in particular when the perturbation concerns a reduced region of the core. If the perturbation is homogeneous throughout the core, the two approaches allow obtaining comparable accuracy results on the quantities of interest. As far as the computational burden is concerned, the POD approach ensures a better efficiency rather than direct Modal Method, thanks to the ability of performing a longer computation in the preprocessing that leads to a faster evaluation during the on-line phase.

[1]  Belinda B. King,et al.  Reduced Order Controllers for Spatially Distributed Systems via Proper Orthogonal Decomposition , 2004, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[2]  Marco Enrico Ricotti,et al.  A multi-physics modelling approach to the dynamics of Molten Salt Reactors , 2011 .

[3]  Weston M. Stacey,et al.  Space-time nuclear reactor kinetics , 1969 .

[4]  A. Chatterjee An introduction to the proper orthogonal decomposition , 2000 .

[5]  Gianluigi Rozza,et al.  Computational Reduction for Parametrized PDEs: Strategies and Applications , 2012 .

[6]  Timothy Abram,et al.  A Technology Roadmap for Generation-IV Nuclear Energy Systems, USDOE/GIF-002-00 , 2002 .

[7]  Gianluigi Rozza,et al.  Certified reduced basis approximation for parametrized partial differential equations and applications , 2011 .

[8]  Christopher C. Pain,et al.  A POD reduced‐order model for eigenvalue problems with application to reactor physics , 2013 .

[9]  E. Merzari,et al.  Proper orthogonal decomposition of the flow in a tight lattice rod-bundle , 2011 .

[10]  Patrick R. Amestoy,et al.  Multifrontal parallel distributed symmetric and unsymmetric solvers , 2000 .

[11]  J. Lewins Nuclear reactor kinetics and control , 1978 .

[12]  Uri M. Ascher,et al.  Computer methods for ordinary differential equations and differential-algebraic equations , 1998 .

[13]  L. Sirovich Turbulence and the dynamics of coherent structures. I. Coherent structures , 1987 .

[14]  A. Patera,et al.  Reduced basis approximation and a posteriori error estimation for affinely parametrized elliptic coercive partial differential equations , 2007 .

[15]  Andreas G. Class,et al.  Semi-automated proper orthogonal decomposition reduced order model non-linear analysis for future BWR stability , 2014 .

[16]  H. P. Lee,et al.  PROPER ORTHOGONAL DECOMPOSITION AND ITS APPLICATIONS—PART I: THEORY , 2002 .

[17]  Chao Yang,et al.  ARPACK users' guide - solution of large-scale eigenvalue problems with implicitly restarted Arnoldi methods , 1998, Software, environments, tools.

[18]  Lingzhi Xia,et al.  Performance evaluation of a 3-D kinetic model for CANDU reactors in a closed-loop environment , 2012 .

[19]  Karl Pearson F.R.S. LIII. On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space , 1901 .

[20]  A. Cammi,et al.  A multi-physics time-dependent model for the Lead Fast Reactor single-channel analysis , 2013 .

[21]  Maria Pusa,et al.  BURNUP CALCULATION CAPABILITY IN THE PSG2 / SERPENT MONTE CARLO REACTOR PHYSICS CODE , 2009 .

[22]  J. Duderstadt,et al.  Nuclear reactor analysis , 1976 .

[23]  P. Holmes,et al.  Turbulence, Coherent Structures, Dynamical Systems and Symmetry , 1996 .