Improving CRISPR–Cas specificity with chemical modifications in single-guide RNAs

Abstract CRISPR systems have emerged as transformative tools for altering genomes in living cells with unprecedented ease, inspiring keen interest in increasing their specificity for perfectly matched targets. We have developed a novel approach for improving specificity by incorporating chemical modifications in guide RNAs (gRNAs) at specific sites in their DNA recognition sequence (‘guide sequence’) and systematically evaluating their on-target and off-target activities in biochemical DNA cleavage assays and cell-based assays. Our results show that a chemical modification (2′-O-methyl-3′-phosphonoacetate, or ‘MP’) incorporated at select sites in the ribose-phosphate backbone of gRNAs can dramatically reduce off-target cleavage activities while maintaining high on-target performance, as demonstrated in clinically relevant genes. These findings reveal a unique method for enhancing specificity by chemically modifying the guide sequence in gRNAs. Our approach introduces a versatile tool for augmenting the performance of CRISPR systems for research, industrial and therapeutic applications.

[1]  J. Wells,et al.  Additivity of mutational effects in proteins. , 1990, Biochemistry.

[2]  D. Heckl,et al.  CRISPR-Cas9-induced t(11;19)/MLL-ENL translocations initiate leukemia in human hematopoietic progenitor cells in vivo , 2017, Haematologica.

[3]  Jong-il Kim,et al.  Digenome-seq: genome-wide profiling of CRISPR-Cas9 off-target effects in human cells , 2015, Nature Methods.

[4]  Jennifer A. Doudna,et al.  Disabling Cas9 by an anti-CRISPR DNA mimic , 2017, Science Advances.

[5]  A. Miccio,et al.  Gene Therapy for β-Hemoglobinopathies. , 2017, Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy.

[6]  Konstantin Severinov,et al.  Interference by clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) RNA is governed by a seed sequence , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  J. Keith Joung,et al.  Efficient Delivery of Genome-Editing Proteins In Vitro and In Vivo , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[8]  Jacob E Corn,et al.  Synthetically modified guide RNA and donor DNA are a versatile platform for CRISPR-Cas9 engineering , 2017, eLife.

[9]  J. Keith Joung,et al.  Improving CRISPR-Cas nuclease specificity using truncated guide RNAs , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[10]  Sruthi Mantri,et al.  CRISPR/Cas9 β-globin gene targeting in human haematopoietic stem cells , 2016, Nature.

[11]  Jennifer A. Doudna,et al.  A conformational checkpoint between DNA binding and cleavage by CRISPR-Cas9 , 2017 .

[12]  Daniel Herschlag,et al.  Challenges in enzyme mechanism and energetics. , 2003, Annual review of biochemistry.

[13]  Jennifer A. Doudna,et al.  A Cas9–guide RNA complex preorganized for target DNA recognition , 2015, Science.

[14]  P. Marszalek,et al.  Structure and specificity of the RNA-guided endonuclease Cas9 during DNA interrogation, target binding and cleavage , 2015, Nucleic acids research.

[15]  Jennifer A. Doudna,et al.  Conformational control of DNA target cleavage by CRISPR–Cas9 , 2015, Nature.

[16]  David A. Scott,et al.  Rationally engineered Cas9 nucleases with improved specificity , 2015, Science.

[17]  Channabasavaiah B. Gurumurthy,et al.  Simplified CRISPR tools for efficient genome editing and streamlined protocols for their delivery into mammalian cells and mouse zygotes , 2017, Methods.

[18]  Daesik Kim,et al.  Highly efficient RNA-guided genome editing in human cells via delivery of purified Cas9 ribonucleoproteins , 2014, Genome research.

[19]  M. Caruthers,et al.  Synthesis and biological activity of phosphonoacetate- and thiophosphonoacetate-modified 2'-O-methyl oligoribonucleotides. , 2012, Organic & biomolecular chemistry.

[20]  Eli J. Fine,et al.  DNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.

[21]  J. Keith Joung,et al.  731. High-Fidelity CRISPR-Cas9 Nucleases with No Detectable Genome-Wide Off-Target Effects , 2016 .

[22]  Rainer Fischer,et al.  Detection of on-target and off-target mutations generated by CRISPR/Cas9 and other sequence-specific nucleases. , 2017, Biotechnology advances.

[23]  F. Demichelis,et al.  Hit and go CAS9 delivered through a lentiviral based self-limiting circuit , 2017, Nature Communications.

[24]  J. Doudna,et al.  CRISPR-Cas9 Structures and Mechanisms. , 2017, Annual review of biophysics.

[25]  Gang Bao,et al.  CRISPR/Cas9 systems targeting β-globin and CCR5 genes have substantial off-target activity , 2013, Nucleic acids research.

[26]  David R. Liu,et al.  Fusion of catalytically inactive Cas9 to FokI nuclease improves the specificity of genome modification , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[27]  Dana Carroll,et al.  Selection-free genome editing of the sickle mutation in human adult hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells , 2016, Science Translational Medicine.

[28]  Jennifer A. Doudna,et al.  Enhanced proofreading governs CRISPR-Cas9 targeting accuracy , 2017, Nature.

[29]  James A. Powell,et al.  Streamlined process for the chemical synthesis of RNA using 2'-O-thionocarbamate-protected nucleoside phosphoramidites in the solid phase. , 2011, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[30]  A. Regev,et al.  Cpf1 Is a Single RNA-Guided Endonuclease of a Class 2 CRISPR-Cas System , 2015, Cell.

[31]  David R. Liu,et al.  High-throughput profiling of off-target DNA cleavage reveals RNA-programmed Cas9 nuclease specificity , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.

[32]  Annaleen Vermeulen,et al.  Versatility of chemically synthesized guide RNAs for CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing. , 2016, Journal of biotechnology.

[33]  D. Herschlag,et al.  Lessons from Enzyme Kinetics Reveal Specificity Principles for RNA-Guided Nucleases in RNA Interference and CRISPR-Based Genome Editing. , 2017, Cell systems.

[34]  Jennifer A. Doudna,et al.  1 1 2 Enhanced proofreading governs CRISPR-Cas 9 targeting accuracy 3 4 , 2017 .

[35]  C. Bennett,et al.  Synthetic CRISPR RNA-Cas9–guided genome editing in human cells , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  P. Hsu,et al.  Methods for Optimizing CRISPR-Cas9 Genome Editing Specificity. , 2016, Molecular cell.

[37]  J. Keith Joung,et al.  High frequency off-target mutagenesis induced by CRISPR-Cas nucleases in human cells , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.

[38]  Martin J. Aryee,et al.  Dimeric CRISPR RNA-guided FokI nucleases for highly specific genome editing , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[39]  J. Joung,et al.  Defining and improving the genome-wide specificities of CRISPR–Cas9 nucleases , 2016, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[40]  Israel Steinfeld,et al.  Chemically modified guide RNAs enhance CRISPR-Cas genome editing in human primary cells , 2015, Nature Biotechnology.

[41]  Feng Zhang,et al.  A split-Cas9 architecture for inducible genome editing and transcription modulation , 2015, Nature Biotechnology.