Static, Ontogenetic, and Evolutionary Allometry: A Multivariate Comparison in Nine Species of Water Striders

Static, ontogenetic, and evolutionary allometry in all five larval instars of nine species of the water strider genera Gerris and Aquarius were compared using a multivariate approach. Common principal component analysis (CPCA), a generalization extending principal component analysis (PCA) to multigroup situations, was carried out on covariance matrices of log-transformed measurements of eight characters of antennae and legs. For all three types of allometry, a good fit of the model of simple multivariate allometry was found, and PCA results were similar in all instars and species, which justifies the use of CPCA to estimate a common pattern of allometric variation for each of the three types of allometry. We found a fairly close association between static and ontogenetic allometry, which indicates at least in part a developmental origin of individual variation. Evolutionary allometry differed markedly from static and ontogenetic allometry, with leg segments displaying strongly positive allometry. We discuss the possible importance of differences in habitat use for the evolution of the characters considered. Static, ontogenetic, and evolutionary variation are reciprocally interrelated phenomena that need to be considered in studies of the evolution of morphological traits.

[1]  C. Klingenberg Multivariate morphometrics of geographic variation of Gerris costae (Heteroptera : gerridae) in Europe , 1992 .

[2]  A Multivariate Comparison of Allometric Growth Patterns , 1991 .

[3]  L. F. Marcus,et al.  MORPHOLOGICAL EVOLUTION IN MUROID RODENTS I. CONSERVATIVE PATTERNS OF CRANIOMETRIC COVARIANCE AND THEIR ONTOGENETIC BASIS IN THE NEOTROPICAL GENUS ZYGODONTOMYS , 1990, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[4]  A. Meyer Morphometrics and allometry in the trophically polymorphic cichlid fish, Cichlasoma citrinellum: Alternative adaptations and ontogenetic changes in shape , 1990 .

[5]  O. Rieppel Ontogeny—a way forward for systematics, a way backward for phylogeny , 1990 .

[6]  R. Strauss PATTERNS OF QUANTITATIVE VARIATION IN LEPIDOPTERAN WING MORPHOLOGY: THE CONVERGENT GROUPS HELICONIINAE AND ITHOMIINAE (PAPILIONOIDEA: NYMPHALIDAE) , 1990, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[7]  F. Bookstein “Size and Shape”: A Comment on Semantics , 1989 .

[8]  B. Flury Common Principal Components and Related Multivariate Models , 1988 .

[9]  B. Flury,et al.  An application of common principal component analysis to cranial morphometry of Microtus californicus and M. ochrogaster(Mammalia, Rodentia) , 1988 .

[10]  W. Atchley,et al.  HOW SIMILAR ARE GENETIC CORRELATION STRUCTURES? DATA FROM MICE AND RATS , 1988, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[11]  M. Zelditch ONTOGENETIC VARIATION IN PATTERNS OF PHENOTYPIC INTEGRATION IN THE LABORATORY RAT , 1988, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[12]  J. Daudin,et al.  Stability of principal component analysis studied by the bootstrap method , 1988 .

[13]  T. M. Cole,et al.  Multivariate analysis of relative growth in the limb bones of Arikara Indians. , 1988, Growth, development, and aging : GDA.

[14]  M. Slatkin QUANTITATIVE GENETICS OF HETEROCHRONY , 1987, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[15]  W. Atchley DEVELOPMENTAL QUANTITATIVE GENETICS AND THE EVOLUTION OF ONTOGENIES , 1987, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[16]  M. Zimmermann Die Larven der schweizerischen Gerris-Arten (Hemiptera, Gerridae) , 1987 .

[17]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  Bootstrap Methods for Standard Errors, Confidence Intervals, and Other Measures of Statistical Accuracy , 1986 .

[18]  R. Kirk Steinhorst,et al.  A COMPARISON OF PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS FROM REAL AND RANDOM DATA , 1985 .

[19]  R. Strauss Evolutionary allometry and variation in body form in the south american catfish genus corydoras callichthyidae , 1985 .

[20]  J. Felsenstein Phylogenies and the Comparative Method , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[21]  L. Fuiman,et al.  Quantitative comparisons of body form and allometry in larval and adult Pacific sculpins (Teleostei: Cottidae) , 1985 .

[22]  A. Baker,et al.  Morphometric Variation in Introduced Populations of the Common Myna (Acridotheres tristis): An Application of the Jackknife to Principal Component Analysis , 1984 .

[23]  P. Boag Growth and allometry of external morphology in Darwin's finches (Geospiza) on Isla Daphne Major, Galapagos , 1984 .

[24]  William R. Atchley,et al.  Ontogeny, Timing of Development, and Genetic Variance-Covariances Structure , 1984, The American Naturalist.

[25]  J. Spence,et al.  Habitat partitioning among developmental stages of waterstriders (Heteroptera: Gerridae) , 1984 .

[26]  W. Atchley,et al.  STATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY ALLOMETRY OF OSTEOMETRIC TRAITS IN SELECTED LINES OF RATS , 1984, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[27]  W. Atchley,et al.  QUANTITATIVE GENETICS OF DEVELOPMENT: GENETIC CORRELATIONS AMONG AGE‐SPECIFIC TRAIT VALUES AND THE EVOLUTION OF ONTOGENY , 1983, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[28]  L. Leamy,et al.  STATIC AND GROWTH ALLOMETRY OF MORPHOMETRIC TRAITS IN RANDOMBRED HOUSE MICE , 1982, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[29]  J. Cheverud Relationships among ontogenetic, static, and evolutionary allometry. , 1982, American journal of physical anthropology.

[30]  J. Spence Experimental Analysis of Microhabitat Selection in Water-Striders (Heteroptera: Gerridae) , 1981 .

[31]  H. Nijhout Physiological Control of Molting in Insects , 1981 .

[32]  B. Riska MORPHOLOGICAL VARIATION IN THE HORSESHOE CRAB LIMULUS POLYPHEMUS , 1981, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[33]  D. Wake,et al.  Size and shape in ontogeny and phylogeny , 1979, Paleobiology.

[34]  R. Lande QUANTITATIVE GENETIC ANALYSIS OF MULTIVARIATE EVOLUTION, APPLIED TO BRAIN:BODY SIZE ALLOMETRY , 1979, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[35]  H. Nijhout Stretch-induced moulting in Oncopeltus fasciatus , 1979 .

[36]  Leslie F. Marcus,et al.  Morphometrics: Multivariate Analysis of Biological Data. , 1978 .

[37]  S. Takai Principal component analysis of the elongation of metacarpal and phalangeal bones. , 1977, American journal of physical anthropology.

[38]  J. Cuzin-Roudy,et al.  A canonical discriminant analysis of post-embryonic development in Notonecta Maculata fabricius (Insecta:Heteroptera). , 1975, Growth.

[39]  J. W. Hopkins,et al.  Some Considerations in Multivariate Allometry , 1966 .

[40]  S. Gould ALLOMETRY AND SIZE IN ONTOGENY AND PHYLOGENY , 1966, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[41]  A G Cock,et al.  Genetical Aspects of Metrical Growth and Form in Animals , 1966, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[42]  Blackith Re,et al.  A BIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF DEVELOPMENT IN DYSDERCUS FASCIATUS SIGN (HEMIPTERA: PYRRHOCORIDAE). , 1963 .

[43]  Pierre Jolicoeur,et al.  The multivariate generalization of the allometry equation , 1963 .

[44]  R. Matsuda Studies of Relative Growth in Gerridae (Hemiptera-Heteroptera). I-III. , 1961 .

[45]  C. I. Bliss,et al.  The Growth of the Head Capsule in Individual Milkweed Bugs , 1954 .